Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-09 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every uniformity has a base of symmetric entourages

Statement

If U\mathcal U is a uniformity on XX, then its symmetric entourages form a filter base: for every EUE\in\mathcal U there is a symmetric DUD\in\mathcal U with DED\subseteq E. More generally, for every entourage EE and every integer n1n\ge 1, there is a symmetric entourage DD whose nn-fold composite satisfies DnED^{\circ n}\subseteq E.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A uniformity U\mathcal U on XX, an entourage EUE\in\mathcal U, and an integer n1n\ge 1.

[A1]

A uniformity is a filter whose members are closed under inverse and admit square roots (Uniform space in the entourage formulation).

[L1]

A nonempty, proper family that refines every pair of its members is a filter base (Filter base and the filter it generates).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose RUR\in\mathcal U with RRER\circ R\subseteq E, and put S:=RR1S:=R\cap R^{-1}.

A1choose
1.2

Put E0:=EE_0:=E. By finitely iterating the square-root axiom, choose entourages E1,,EnE_1,\ldots,E_n such that Ek+1Ek+1EkE_{k+1}\circ E_{k+1}\subseteq E_k for 0k<n0\le k<n, and put D:=EnEn1D:=E_n\cap E_n^{-1}.

A1choose
2.1

The set SS is an entourage, since R,R1UR,R^{-1}\in\mathcal U and a filter is closed under intersections; also S=S1S=S^{-1} and SRRES\subseteq R\circ R\subseteq E, because every entourage contains the diagonal.

step 1.1A1
2.2

The entourage DD is symmetric and DEnD\subseteq E_n. Induction on kk gives D2kEnkD^{\circ 2^k}\subseteq E_{n-k} for 0kn0\le k\le n, hence D2nED^{\circ 2^n}\subseteq E. Since every entourage contains the diagonal and n2nn\le 2^n, one may insert diagonal factors to obtain DnD2nED^{\circ n}\subseteq D^{\circ 2^n}\subseteq E.

step 1.2A1algebra
3.1

Thus symmetric entourages refine every entourage; their intersections are symmetric entourages and none is empty because each contains the diagonal, so they form a filter base by [L1].

step 2.1L1
4.1

Therefore symmetric entourages form a base and admit the asserted finite-composite control.

step 3.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources