Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Consistency bounds for the Crouzeix–Raviart Poisson method

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let 1/2<r≤1, let u∈H01(Ω)∩H1+r(Ω) solve −Δu=f∈L2(Ω) distributionally, and let h be the maximum cell diameter of a finite matching shape-regular mesh. With the method of The Crouzeix–Raviart method for the homogeneous Poisson problem, define Rh(u;vh):=a~h(u,vh)−Fh(vh),vh∈VhCR,0, where a~h is the cellwise extension in The Crouzeix–Raviart method for the homogeneous Poisson problem. Then ∣Rh(u;vh)∣≤Chr∣u∣H1+r(Ω)∥∇hvh∥L2(Ω). If also 1/2<s≤1 and ζ∈H01(Ω)∩H1+s(Ω), then ∣Rh(u;IhCRζ)∣≤Chr+s∣u∣H1+r(Ω)∣ζ∣H1+s(Ω). The constants depend only on d, the shape-regularity bound, r, and s.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded connected Lipschitz polyhedral domain, a finite matching shape-regular simplicial mesh, u,f,r,s,ζ as in the Statement, and the definitions of The Crouzeix–Raviart method for the homogeneous Poisson problem and The face-average Crouzeix–Raviart interpolant.

[F1]

Cellwise Green's identity holds for u and every H1(K) test, and traces of global H01 functions vanish on boundary facets. (Fractional face traces and cellwise Green identity on a simplex)

[F2]

The normal traces of ∇u∈Hr(Ω) agree across shared facets; all CR interior jumps and boundary traces have zero face mean. (Fractional face traces and cellwise Green identity on a simplex, The global homogeneous Crouzeix–Raviart space)

[F3]

The mean fluctuation of a normal trace of ∇u on a facet is bounded by ChKr−1/2∣∇u∣Hr(K). (Fractional face traces and cellwise Green identity on a simplex)

[F4]

The scaled face-jump norm of vh∈VhCR,0 is bounded by C∥∇hvh∥2. (Face jumps are controlled by the broken gradient)

[F5]

The face-average interpolant has matching interior face means, zero boundary face means, and hF−1/2∥γF(ζ−IKCRζ)∥2≤ChKs∣ζ∣H1+s(K). (Local approximation by the face-average Crouzeix–Raviart interpolant)

[F6]

Holder's inequality with exponents 2,2 makes the volume and facet products below integrable and bounds their integrals by the product of the L2 norms. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F6givenalgebra

Apply [F1] on each cell and sum. The volume products are integrable by [F6] because ∇u,∇hvh,f,vh∈L2 on each cell. For an interior facet F=K+∩K−, [F2] identifies both traces of ∇u, and the two outward normals are opposite. Their normal traces and the jumps are in L2(F), so [F6] also makes each boundary product integrable. The boundary terms therefore combine to Rh(u;vh)=∑F∈F∘∫F(γF∇u⋅nK+,F)[vh]F dS+∑F∈F∂∫F(γF∇u⋅nK,F)vh dS. The sign follows from −Δu=f in the Green identity.

1.2A1F1F2F5givenalgebra

Write eK=ζ−IKCRζ. On an interior facet the common trace of ζ gives [IhCRζ]F=−γF,K+eK++γF,K−eK−. On a boundary facet, γF,KIKCRζ=−γF,KeK because ζ has zero trace. Applying [F5], summing over the at most d+1 facets of each cell, and using nonnegativity of the local fractional seminorm integrals gives ∑FhF−1∥[IhCRζ]F∥L2(F)2≤Ch2s∣ζ∣H1+s(Ω)2. The face mean of each such jump is zero by [F5].

2.1A1F2F3F4F6step 1.1givenalgebra

Each jump in step 1.1 has zero face mean by [F2], so subtract the mean of its normal-gradient factor. Regard the finitely many facets as a disjoint union with surface measure on each component; Holder [F6] with the component functions hF1/2(qF−avg⁡FqF) and hF−1/2[vh]F gives ∣Rh(u;vh)∣≤(∑FhF∥qF−avg⁡FqF∥L2(F)2)1/2(∑FhF−1∥[vh]F∥L2(F)2)1/2, where qF denotes the corresponding outward normal trace (and the boundary jump is vh). By [F3], the first factor is at most Chr∣u∣H1+r(Ω): each cell contributes at most d+1 facet terms, and the sum of the cell Gagliardo seminorms is bounded by the global seminorm because the integrands are nonnegative and K×K⊂Ω×Ω. The second factor is at most C∥∇hvh∥2 by [F4]. This proves the general bound.

3.1A1F3F6step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

Use the same face representation as step 1.1 with vh=IhCRζ. Subtract the normal-trace means as in step 2.1. Holder [F6] on the disjoint union of facets bounds the product of the first weighted factor, at most Chr∣u∣H1+r(Ω) by [F3], and the second, at most Chs∣ζ∣H1+s(Ω) by step 1.2. Their product is the sharper asserted bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources