Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Face jumps are controlled by the broken gradient

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For every matching shape-regular simplicial mesh and vh∈VhCR,0, ∑F∈F∘∪F∂hF−1∥[vh]F∥L2(F)2≤C∥∇hvh∥L2(Ω)2. On an interior facet, [vh]F=vK+−vK−; on a boundary facet, [vh]F=vK. The constant depends only on d and the shape-regularity bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a finite matching shape-regular simplicial mesh, and vh in the global CR space of The global homogeneous Crouzeix–Raviart space.

[A1]

Countable Choice is required by the shape-regular affine simplex scaling interface used below. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The mean of every interior jump and every boundary trace jump is zero by the defining face-average constraints. (The global homogeneous Crouzeix–Raviart space)

[F2]

On a shape-regular simplex, ∣K∣≍hKd, ∣F∣≍hKd−1, and adjacent cell/facet diameters are comparable. (Shape regularity controls affine simplex geometry)

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Let F be a facet of K and let bF be its barycenter. For any affine jF on F, jF(x)=jF(bF)+∇FjF⋅(x−bF) and ∫F(x−bF) dS=0 by the definition bF=∣F∣−1∫Fx dS; hence its face average is exactly jF(bF). On an interior facet, the jump jF=[vh]F is affine with zero mean by [F1], hence jF(bF)=0. On a boundary facet, jF=vK has zero mean and likewise jF(bF)=0. Therefore for every x∈F, ∣jF(x)∣=∣∇FjF⋅(x−bF)∣≤hF(∣∇vK+∣+∣∇vK−∣), with the absent cell term omitted on the boundary.

2.1A1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Squaring step 1.1 and integrating on F gives hF−1∥jF∥L2(F)2≤ChFd(∣∇vK+∣2+∣∇vK−∣2), where the factor hFd is hF−1⋅hF2⋅∣F∣. By [F2], hFd∣∇vK∣2≤C∣K∣∣∇vK∣2=C∥∇vK∥L2(K)2 for each incident cell. Summing over facets counts each cell at most d+1 times, proving the estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources