Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Poincare bound on a slab-bounded domain

Statement

Let Ω⊂Rd be open and satisfy a<x⋅e<b for a unit vector e and all x∈Ω, with a<b. Then every v∈H01(Ω) satisfies ∥v∥L2(Ω)≤(b−a)∥∇v∥L2(Ω). The argument assumes Countable Choice through the stated Sobolev, product-measure, and affine change-of-variables interfaces; it does not use the Axiom of Choice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, an open domain contained in the slab a<x⋅e<b, and v∈H01(Ω), where H01 is the W1,2-closure of Cc∞(Ω).

[F2]

Countable Choice gives Tonelli/Fubini for nonnegative integrands on the Euclidean product spaces used below. (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F3]

For an orthogonal matrix Q, QTQ=I and ∣det⁡Q∣=1; the linear affine map y↦Qy is a C1 diffeomorphism, so change of variables preserves integrals of nonnegative measurable functions. (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions)

[F4]

Holder's inequality with exponents 2,2 gives ∣∫Ifg∣≤∥f∥L2(I)∥g∥L2(I) and, in particular, ∣∫atg∣2≤(t−a)∫at∣g∣2. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)

Proof

1.1F1F4givenalgebra

First let φ∈Cc∞(Ω) and extend it by zero to Rd. Write x=x⊥+te with x⊥⊥e. For fixed x⊥ and a<t<b, the fundamental theorem [F1] gives φ(x⊥+te)=∫at∂eφ(x⊥+se) ds, since the zero extension vanishes at t=a. Holder's inequality [F4], applied on (a,t) and then enlarged to (a,b), yields ∣φ(x⊥+te)∣2≤(b−a)∫ab∣∂eφ(x⊥+se)∣2 ds.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Integrate step 1.1 over t∈(a,b) and x⊥∈e⊥. Choose an orthonormal basis of e⊥ and let Q have those basis vectors followed by e as its columns. Then T(y)=Qy sends (y⊥,t) to x⊥+te; Tonelli [F2] and QTQ=I, ∣det⁡Q∣=1 in [F3] give the coordinate integral over the slab. The zero extension of φ and its derivative vanish off Ω, so those slab integrals equal their integrals over Ω. Thus ∥φ∥L2(Ω)2≤(b−a)2∥∂eφ∥L2(Ω)2≤(b−a)2∥∇φ∥L2(Ω)2.

3.1F4givenstep 2.1algebra∎

Let δ>0. By the closure definition of H01(Ω), choose a single φ∈Cc∞(Ω) with ∥v−φ∥H1<δ. The L2 triangle inequality follows by expanding ∥f+g∥22 and applying [F4] to the cross term; hence [F4] and step 2.1 give ∥v∥2≤∥φ∥2+δ≤(b−a)∥∇φ∥2+δ≤(b−a)∥∇v∥2+(b−a+1)δ. This holds for every δ>0, so letting δ↓0 proves the statement without selecting a sequence of approximants.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources