Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cylinders give reflexivity of cobordism

Statement

For every closed smooth n-manifold M, the product M×[0,1] with its product smooth structure and the collars θ0:[0,1)×M→M×[0,1],θ0(s,x)=(x,s), θ1:(−1,0]×M→M×[0,1],θ1(s,x)=(x,1+s), is a bordism from M to M: take (∂(M×[0,1]))0=M×{0} and (∂(M×[0,1]))1=M×{1} (Unoriented smooth cobordism of closed manifolds).

If (M,o) is oriented and [0,1] carries its standard orientation, then with the product orientation o⊗dt of M×[0,1] the induced boundary orientation (Induced boundary orientation) on M×{0} is (−1)n+1o and that on M×{1} is (−1)no; consequently M×[0,1] oriented by (−1)n(o⊗dt) is an oriented bordism from (M,o) to (M,o) (Oriented smooth cobordism). Hence M is cobordant to itself in both theories.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed smooth n-manifold M, the product W=M×[0,1] with its product smooth structure, and the maps θ0(s,x)=(x,s), θ1(s,x)=(x,1+s). In the oriented case, orientations o of M and the standard orientation of [0,1].

[F1]

The boundaryless product atlas is given by Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure. For M×[0,1], use the same product charts with interval charts t in the interior, t near 0, and 1−t near 1; the last two take values in a half-space and their transitions extend smoothly, so Immersions and embeddings for manifolds with boundary supplies the usual product collars. The interval is compact by For n≥1, every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact after affine rescaling, and M×[0,1] is compact by A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology.

[F2]

If one factor of a product is closed, the boundary is the product of the other factor's boundary with the closed factor, and the orientation sign is (−1)dim⁡ of the closed factor: for oriented Mm with ∂N=∅ one has ∂(M×N)=∂M×N with the product boundary orientation, while if ∂M=∅ then M×∂N carries (−1)m times the product orientation (Boundary orientation of a product with at most one boundary factor). On the interval with its standard orientation, ∂[0,1]={1}−{0} (Boundary orientation is independent of the outward vector field).

[F3]

The product orientation is the tensor product of the selected rays under the ordered determinant isomorphism, and the induced boundary orientation is the outward-normal-first one (Product orientations, Induced boundary orientation).

[F4]

A bordism from M0 to M1 is data (W,θ0,θ1) with a decomposition of ∂W into open and closed parts and collar embeddings onto open collar neighbourhoods; an oriented bordism additionally carries an orientation of W whose induced boundary orientations are −o0 on the incoming and o1 on the outgoing face (Unoriented smooth cobordism of closed manifolds, Oriented smooth cobordism).

[F5]

The maps θ0,θ1 have injective differentials and are homeomorphisms onto their images, hence are smooth embeddings (Immersions and embeddings for manifolds with boundary, Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4F5

(W with the two collars is a bordism.) The product charts and compactness in [F1] make W a compact smooth manifold with boundary. The boundary of W=M×[0,1] is M×∂[0,1]=M×{0}⊔M×{1} by [F2] applied with the second factor [0,1]; the two parts are open and closed in the boundary. The maps θ0 and θ1 are smooth embeddings by [F5]; their images are M×[0,1) and M×(0,1], which are open neighbourhoods of M×{0} and M×{1} in W, and θ0({0}×M)=M×{0}, θ1({0}×M)=M×{1}. By [F4] the data (W,θ0,θ1) are a bordism from M to M; the construction uses no choice.

1.2F2F3

(Induced orientations of the two faces.) Suppose M is oriented by o. Apply the second clause of [F2] to Mm=M, m=n, and N=[0,1] with its standard orientation: the boundary M×∂[0,1] carries (−1)n times the product orientation o⊗o[0,1]. Since ∂[0,1]={1}−{0} by [F2], the face M×{1} carries (−1)n(o⊗(+1))=(−1)no and the face M×{0} carries (−1)n(o⊗(−1))=(−1)n+1o.

2.1F3F4step 1.2

(W oriented by (−1)n(o⊗dt) is an oriented bordism.) Reverse the orientation of W when n is odd; that is, orient W by ω:=(−1)n(o⊗dt). Reversing an orientation reverses every induced boundary orientation, so by step 1.2 the face M×{0} now carries −o and the face M×{1} carries o. With (∂W)0=M×{0} and (∂W)1=M×{1}, this is exactly the oriented bordism condition −o incoming, o outgoing of [F4]: (W,ω,θ0,θ1) is an oriented bordism from (M,o) to (M,o). For even n the orientation ω is the product orientation itself.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

(Reflexivity in both theories.) Step 1.1 exhibits the cylinder as a bordism from M to M, so M is cobordant to itself in the unoriented theory; step 2.1 exhibits, for every orientation o of a closed smooth M, an oriented bordism from (M,o) to (M,o), so (M,o) is oriented cobordant to itself. The empty manifold is covered (M=∅, W=∅×[0,1]=∅). No choice principle is used anywhere: the data are the explicit collars of the product.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources