Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The bad part is integrable away from expanded cubes

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Let T be a Calderón–Zygmund operator with kernel constants A1,A2 (Calderón–Zygmund kernels and their associated operators), let Q be a dyadic cube (Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n) with centre cQ, and let bQ∈L2(Rn) be supported in Q with ∫bQ=0. If Q∗ is the cube concentric with Q whose side length is 2n times the side length of Q, then ∫Rn∖Q∗∣TbQ(x)∣ dx≤A2∥bQ∥1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Calderón–Zygmund operator T with kernel k and constants A1,A2; a dyadic cube Q of side length ℓ=2−k with centre cQ; the concentric cube Q∗ of side length 2n ℓ; a function bQ∈L2 supported in Q with ∫bQ=0.

[F1]

T is linear and L2-bounded, and for every compactly supported f∈L2 one has Tf(x)=∫k(x−y)f(y) dy for almost every x∉supp⁡f, the integral converging absolutely there; the Hörmander condition reads sup⁡y≠0∫∣x∣≥2∣y∣∣k(x−y)−k(x)∣ dx≤A2 and is invariant under replacing the origin by any centre (Calderón–Zygmund kernels and their associated operators).

[F2]

Q⊆{x:∣xi−cQ,i∣≤ℓ/2 for every i} and Q∗={x:∣xi−cQ,i∣≤n ℓ for every i} in the notation of Dyadic cubes of all generations in R^n; the Euclidean and supremum norms on Rn satisfy ∥v∥∞≤∥v∥2≤n ∥v∥∞.

[F3]

On a product of σ-finite measure spaces a nonnegative product-measurable function may be integrated in either order, both integrals possibly +∞ (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2givenalgebra

If y∈Q and x∉Q∗, then ∥x−cQ∥∞>n ℓ and ∥y−cQ∥∞≤ℓ/2, so by [F2] ∥x−cQ∥2≥∥x−cQ∥∞>n ℓ≥2∥y−cQ∥2; hence ∣x−cQ∣≥2∣y−cQ∣, and in particular x≠cQ and x≠y.

2.1F1givenalgebra

For almost every x∉Q∗ one has, using [F1] and the mean-zero condition, TbQ(x)=∫k(x−y)bQ(y) dy=∫Rn[k(x−y)−k(x−cQ)]bQ(y) dy, because bQ vanishes off Q, the subtracted term is the constant k(x−cQ) times ∫bQ=0, and x−cQ≠0 by step 1.1.

3.1F3step 2.1algebra

By step 2.1 and nonnegativity, for almost every x∉Q∗, ∣TbQ(x)∣≤∫Q∣k(x−y)−k(x−cQ)∣ ∣bQ(y)∣ dy. Integrating this inequality over Rn∖Q∗, whose complement has finite measure at every scale and which is σ-finite, and applying Tonelli's theorem [F3] to the nonnegative product-measurable integrand gives ∫Rn∖Q∗∣TbQ∣≤∫Q∣bQ(y)∣(∫Rn∖Q∗∣k(x−y)−k(x−cQ)∣ dx)dy.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

For y=cQ the difference integrand is zero. For every other y∈Q the inner integral is at most A2: by step 1.1 the domain Rn∖Q∗ is contained in {x:∣x−cQ∣≥2∣y−cQ∣}, and the change of variables u=x−cQ, v=y−cQ turns the integral over that larger set into ∫∣u∣≥2∣v∣∣k(u−v)−k(u)∣ du≤A2 by the translation-invariant Hörmander condition of [F1]. Substituting into step 3.1 yields the asserted bound ∫Rn∖Q∗∣TbQ∣≤A2∫Q∣bQ∣=A2∥bQ∥1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources