Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The good part has controlled L2 image

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let T be a Calderón–Zygmund operator with kernel constants A1,A2 and L2 norm B, and let f=g+∑jbj be the Calderón–Zygmund decomposition of f∈L1(Rn) at height λ>0 (Calderón–Zygmund decomposition at height λ). Then ∣{∣Tg∣>λ/2}∣≤4B22nλ−1∥f∥1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f∈L1, λ>0, its Calderón–Zygmund decomposition with good part g at height λ; a Calderón–Zygmund operator T with L2 norm bound B.

[F1]

The good part satisfies g∈L2(Rn) with ∥g∥22≤2nλ∥f∥1 (Calderón–Zygmund decomposition at height λ).

[F2]

T:L2→L2 is linear with ∥Th∥2≤B∥h∥2 for every h∈L2 (Calderón–Zygmund kernels and their associated operators).

[F3]

For a measurable u and μ>0, μ({∣u∣≥μ})≤μ−2∫∣u∣2 dμ; more precisely λ({∣u∣>μ})≤μ−2∫∣u∣2dλ by Chebyshev's inequality applied to ∣u∣2 at level μ2 (Chebyshev-Markov inequality for the integral).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

Since g∈L2 by [F1], linearity of T gives Tg∈L2 with ∥Tg∥2≤B∥g∥2.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra∎

Chebyshev's inequality at level (λ/2)2 applied to ∣Tg∣2, followed by step 1.1 and the bound of [F1], gives ∣{∣Tg∣>λ/2}∣≤4λ2∥Tg∥22≤4B2λ2∥g∥22≤4B2λ2 2nλ∥f∥1=4B22nλ−1∥f∥1, which is the asserted estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources