How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The good part has controlled L2 image
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a Calderón–Zygmund operator with kernel constants and norm , and let be the Calderón–Zygmund decomposition of at height (Calderón–Zygmund decomposition at height λ). Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , its Calderón–Zygmund decomposition with good part at height ; a Calderón–Zygmund operator with norm bound .
The good part satisfies with (Calderón–Zygmund decomposition at height λ).
is linear with for every (Calderón–Zygmund kernels and their associated operators).
For a measurable and , ; more precisely by Chebyshev's inequality applied to at level (Chebyshev-Markov inequality for the integral).
Proof
Since by [F1], linearity of gives with .
Chebyshev's inequality at level applied to , followed by step 1.1 and the bound of [F1], gives which is the asserted estimate.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Terence Tao, Math 247A Lecture Notes 4 (standard reference, not scraped)