How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite geometric error bound from a one-step recurrence
Statement
Let , with , , with , and . Real powers of the positive base are as in Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention. If nonnegative real numbers satisfy then, when , and, when ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The constants, step size, and nonnegative error sequence in the Statement.
, , , , , and the stated initial and recurrence inequalities hold.
The real exponential is , with and (The real exponential function and the number by a power series).
For every real , ( for every real , hence ).
If , then for every natural (Monotonicity of and of ); natural powers satisfy and (Integer powers ).
for real (The exponential addition formula ).
The real exponential is strictly increasing (The exponential function is strictly increasing).
Finite sums satisfy additivity and scaling (Laws of finite sums and finite products, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion).
Finite sums telescope as (Laws of finite sums and finite products).
Proof
Put and . By induction on , the recurrence gives for : the sum is empty at , where the bound is equality in the first term, and substituting the bound at into appends the term .
If , then and [F6, F7] give , so . By [F2], . If then ; if , [F3] gives . Induction using [F1] and [F4] gives for every natural . Since , , and [F5] gives . Substitution in step 1.1, using [F8] to simplify the real-power factor, yields . If , then and step 1.1 gives by [F8], because and . Taking the maximum proves both cases.
Depends on
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- Integer powers $a^m$
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention
- The real exponential function and the number $e$ by a power series
- $1+x\le\exp(x)$ for every real $x$, hence $(1-p)^m\le\exp(-mp)$
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- Monotonicity of $x \mapsto x^n$ and of $n \mapsto a^n$
- The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents
- The exponential addition formula $\exp(x+y)=\exp(x)\exp(y)$
- The exponential function is strictly increasing
Used by
- Second-order global bound under symmetric coupling and a cubic defect Corollary
- Local C1 step consistency gives tangent, adjoint and gradient order Lemma
- One-node Gauss collocation is implicit midpoint of order two Proposition
- A stage residual tolerance preserves collocation order Theorem
- Backward Euler, the selected SDIRK, and two-stage Radau IIA converge at their stated orders under controlled stage residuals Theorem
- Compatible-grid Euler has first-order solution and derivative error for a stable neutral delay Theorem
- Coupled backward Euler is first order for a regular index-one DAE Theorem
- Coupled constant-step BDF2 is second order for a regular index-one DAE Theorem
- Each SDC sweep raises the order up to the collocation order Theorem
- First-order finite-volume convergence for compatible smooth renewal data Theorem
- Fixed-time first-order error bound for frozen-slow Euler Theorem
- Fourth-order global error for RK4 on a regularized vortex particle tube Theorem
- Global error from uniform one-step defect and stability Theorem
- IMEX Euler preserves first-order convergence under per-step residuals of order h squared Theorem
- The ARS(2,2,2) pair is second order under distinct stage residual tolerances Theorem
- Weak consistency of age-cohort characteristic quadrature Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ernst Hairer and Gerhard Wanner, Introduction à l’Analyse Numérique, Chapter III: Équations Différentielles Ordinaires (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mark Embree, Lecture Notes on Numerical Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)