Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compatible-grid Euler has first-order solution and derivative error for a stable neutral delay

Statement

Let T=Kτ with integers K,m≥1, set h=τ/m and N=Km, and let ∣a∣<1. Assume the compatible scalar neutral-delay problem of Scalar neutral delay equations and the derivative-segment shift has the unique solution y supplied by Method of steps gives a unique compatible neutral-delay solution. Suppose y is C1 on [0,T], each grid-cell restriction is C2 with one-sided endpoint derivatives, and ∣y′′(t)∣≤M on each cell interior for a constant M≥0. Apply Explicit Euler for a scalar neutral delay on a compatible grid with exact history values and complete all N updates (no budget or an integer budget B≥N). Put Λ=2L/(1−∣a∣). If Λ>0, set CT=(M/2)(eΛT−1)/Λ; if Λ=0, set CT=MT/2. Then max⁡0≤n≤N∣Yn−y(tn)∣≤CTh,max⁡0≤n<N∣Vn−y′(tn)∣≤ΛCTh.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The scalar neutral-delay equation, compatible history, stable coefficient ∣a∣<1, a completed grid-aligned Euler run (no budget or B≥N), and the piecewise C2 exact solution in the Statement.

[F1]

At each time tn, y′(tn)=ay′(tn−τ)+f(tn,y(tn),y(tn−τ)), with negative-time values and derivatives given by ϕ and ϕ′ (Scalar neutral delay equations and the derivative-segment shift).

[F2]

Euler initializes the history exactly and uses Vn=aϕ′(tn−τ)+f(tn,Yn,Yn−m) for n<m, and Vn=aVn−m+f(tn,Yn,Yn−m) for n≥m (Explicit Euler for a scalar neutral delay on a compatible grid).

[F3]

On any finite derivative-array prefix of length M, the delayed mesh shift has inverse (I−aS)−1 with operator norm at most (1−∣a∣)−1 (The neutral derivative shift has a bounded Neumann inverse when ∣a∣<1).

[F4]

A bounded derivative makes a differentiable vector path Lipschitz, and the vector-valued fundamental theorem gives increments as integrals (If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz).

[L1]

If e0≤C0hp and en+1≤(1+ℓh)en+Chp+1 on a uniform grid of length T, then the finite recurrence has the explicit exponential bound, including the ℓ=0 branch (Finite geometric error bound from a one-step recurrence).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Define ej=∣Yj−y(tj)∣ for j≥0, ej=0 for −m≤j<0, En=max⁡−m≤j≤nej, and wj=Vj−y′(tj). For j<m, [F1]--[F2] give wj=f(tj,Yj,Yj−m)−f(tj,y(tj),y(tj−τ)); for j≥m they give wj=awj−m plus this same f difference. In both cases the residual vector g0:n:=w0:n−aSm(n+1)w0:n has supremum norm at most 2LEn.

1.2F4F5givenalgebra

By [F4], y(tn+1)−y(tn)=∫tntn+1y′(s) ds. On this cell, [F4] applied to y′ gives ∣y′(s)−y′(tn)∣≤M(s−tn); [F5] then bounds the difference between this integral and hy′(tn) by ∫tntn+1M(s−tn) ds=Mh2/2.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

The shift inverse [F3], applied to the prefix of length n+1, yields max⁡0≤j≤n∣wj∣≤2LEn/(1−∣a∣)=ΛEn.

3.1F2F6step 2.1step 1.2L1algebra∎

Subtract the exact increment of step 1.2 from the Euler update in [F2] and use the triangle inequality [F6] and step 2.1 to obtain en+1≤en+hΛEn+(M/2)h2. Hence En+1≤(1+Λh)En+(M/2)h2, with E0=0. Applying [L1] with p=1, C0=0, C=M/2, and ℓ=Λ gives EN≤CTh in both branches of the Statement. Step 2.1 then gives the stated derivative bound.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources