Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Method of steps gives a unique compatible neutral-delay solution

Statement

Let T=Kτ with integer K≥1, let a∈R, and assume the scalar neutral-delay data satisfy Scalar neutral delay equations and the derivative-segment shift: ϕ∈C1([−τ,0],R) is compatible at zero, and f is continuous and globally Lipschitz in its current and delayed state variables. Then there is exactly one C1 solution on [−τ,T]. On each interval [kτ,(k+1)τ], the delayed state and delayed derivative are known from the preceding interval, so the equation reduces to an ordinary differential equation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compatible scalar neutral-delay initial-value problem, its finite horizon, and the stated Lipschitz bound.

[F1]

The neutral equation is y′(t)=ay′(t−τ)+f(t,y(t),y(t−τ)) and compatibility at zero is ϕ′(0)=aϕ′(−τ)+f(0,ϕ(0),ϕ(−τ)) (Scalar neutral delay equations and the derivative-segment shift).

[F2]

A continuous state-Lipschitz ODE field has a unique local solution; the quantitative compact-cylinder criterion supplies a solution staying in a prescribed ball when hM≤r and Lh<1 (Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems).

[F3]

Gronwall bounds a nonnegative continuous function satisfying u(t)≤A+∫0tBu(s) ds by AeBt (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).

[F5]

A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).

[F6]

The real absolute value satisfies ∣x+y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣ (The triangle inequality).

[F7]

A differentiable vector path with integrable derivative has increments equal to integrals of that derivative (If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2construct

Suppose the solution is known through kτ. On Ik=[kτ,(k+1)τ], both zk(t)=y(t−τ) and gk(t)=y′(t−τ) are known continuous functions, including the first interval where they come from ϕ and ϕ′. Extend these known functions constantly just past the interval endpoints. The neutral equation on Ik becomes x′=agk(t)+f(t,x,zk(t)), a continuous ODE field that is globally L-Lipschitz in x; [F2] gives a unique local solution from the prescribed endpoint.

2.1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

On a partial segment, [F7] gives the integral equation; [F4], [F6], and the Lipschitz bound then give ∣x(t)∣≤∣x(kτ)∣+∫kτt(Bk+L∣x(s)∣) ds, where Bk=∣a∣∥gk∥∞+sup⁡Ik∣f(s,0,0)∣+L∥zk∥∞ is finite by [F5] and continuity of f. Since the interval length is at most τ, this implies ∣x(t)∣≤∣x(kτ)∣+Bkτ+L∫kτt∣x(s)∣ ds. By [F3], ∣x(t)∣≤Rk:=(∣x(kτ)∣+Bkτ)eLτ throughout that partial segment. On the ball ∣x∣≤Rk+1, the ODE field is bounded by Mk:=Bk+L(Rk+1). Choose δk>0 within the time-domain margin with δkMk≤1 and Lδk<1; [F2] continues the solution by at least δk whenever it has not reached the right endpoint. Finitely many such continuations cover Ik.

2.2F1step 1.1algebra

The history derivative and the solution derivative agree at zero by the compatibility equation in [F1]. At a later breakpoint (k+1)τ, the left and right limits of ay′(t−τ)+f(t,y(t),y(t−τ)) agree because y and y′ already agree continuously at kτ and f is continuous. Thus the stepwise solution is C1 across each breakpoint.

3.1F2step 2.1step 2.2induction∎

The first interval is uniquely determined by [F2]. If two solutions agree through kτ, they have the same known functions zk,gk on Ik, so ODE uniqueness in [F2] makes them agree throughout that interval. Induction over the finite K intervals proves existence and uniqueness on [−τ,T].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources