How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A distribution with a vanishing derivative is a polynomial
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let and let be a distribution on the connected open set . Test functions are complex-valued and distributions are complex-linear; here, real distribution means that for every real-valued test function . If is a real distribution and its st distributional derivative is zero, then there is a real algebraic polynomial of degree at most whose regular distribution equals .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , and a real distribution with .
A distribution on a connected open set whose first derivative vanishes is a constant regular distribution, under Countable Choice (A distribution with zero derivatives on a connected open set is constant).
The distributional derivative acts by signed differentiation of test functions; derivatives preserve realness because derivatives of real-valued tests are real-valued (Distributional derivative).
A smooth regular distribution differentiates to the regular distribution of its classical derivative, under Countable Choice (Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes).
The formal derivative of is for , and its th derivative is (The formal derivative of a polynomial).
Countable Choice means every sequence of nonempty sets has a function choosing one element from each (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()); it is assumed by the supplied regular-distribution derivative theorem.
A compact subset of an open set admits a nonnegative smooth cutoff equal to one near it; for this gives a real test function with positive finite integral (positivity follows from the positive measure of an interval), which can be normalized to have integral one (Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
Proof
Base case : the hypothesis is , so [F1] gives a constant regular distribution with some value . Choose a real test function with integral one by [F5]. Since and is real, . Thus is represented by a real polynomial of degree at most zero.
Inductive step: let and assume the result for . The distribution satisfies and is real by [F2]. By [F1], is the constant distribution with some value . Choose a real test function with integral one by [F5]. Since and is real, .
The smooth polynomial has as a regular distribution by [F3] and [F4]. Thus satisfies . The induction hypothesis applied with index gives a polynomial of degree at most whose regular distribution is .
The polynomial has degree at most and its regular distribution is , since regular distributions and distributional derivatives are linear. This completes the induction.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Distributional derivative
- The formal derivative of a polynomial
- A distribution with zero derivatives on a connected open set is constant
- Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes
- Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Semyon Dyatlov, Lecture Notes for 18.155, distributions and derivatives (standard reference, not scraped)