Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every divisor is a finite signed sum of points

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic suppliers below. Let k be a field, let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over k (Curves over a field) and let D=∑xnx[x] be a divisor on C (Divisors on a smooth proper curve). Write D+ and D− for the positive and negative parts of D (Divisor support positive negative parts).

  1. (Decomposition.) D is a finite Z-linear combination of closed points, and D=D+−D− with D+ and D− effective divisors of disjoint support; consequently deg⁡k(D)=deg⁡k(D+)−deg⁡k(D−) (Degree divisor proper curve, Effective divisors have nonnegative degree).
  2. (Chain.) Let p1,…,pm be a listing of the points of Supp⁡(D+) in which each point x occurs exactly nx times, and let q1,…,qn be a listing of the points of Supp⁡(D−) in which each point y occurs exactly −ny times. For every ordering of the m+n signed symbols +[p1],…,+[pm],−[q1],…,−[qn], the chain of divisors M0=0, Mk=Mk−1±[rk], where the k-th symbol is ±[rk], has successive differences ±[rk] at closed points and ends at Mm+n=∑i[pi]−∑j[qj]=D.
  3. (Order-independent iterated computation.) Computing χ along this chain by the one-point shift of Euler characteristic changes by the residue degree, every step changes the value by +[κ(rk):k] for an addition and by −[κ(rk):k] for a removal, so the telescoping total is χ(C,OC(D))=χ(C,OC(0))+∑i[κ(pi):k]−∑j[κ(qj):k]=χ(C,OC(0))+deg⁡k(D+)−deg⁡k(D−)=χ(C,OC(0))+deg⁡k(D), a value that depends only on the multiset of listed points and not on the chosen ordering; identifying OC(0)≅OC with the structure sheaf, this reads χ(C,OC(D))=χ(C,OC)+deg⁡k(D). Here χ is the Euler characteristic of coherent sheaves on the proper k-scheme C (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf), and every sheaf appearing is coherent (Finite-dimensionality of the Riemann-Roch space).

The attachment of the invertible sheaf OC(D) to the divisor D and the identification OC(0)≅OC use the current interfaces of Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor and Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve. The latter has an explicit Dependent Choice premise, supplied by the stated Axiom of Choice through AC implies DC implies countable choice; these premises are recorded in [F6] and [F7]. (Scaffold repair: the scaffold's phrase "enumeration of the support" is read as a listing with repetitions, each point occurring exactly as often as its coefficient, which is what makes the chain end at D; the statement above says this explicitly.)

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the Euler-characteristic and Cartier-divisor suppliers; a field k, a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over k, a divisor D=∑xnx[x] on C, and listings p1,…,pm, q1,…,qn as in part 2.

[F1]

Divisors, parts and degree. The divisors on C are the finite formal integral combinations of closed points and form the free abelian group Div⁡(C); the support Supp⁡(D)={x:nx≠0} is finite, D+=∑xmax⁡(nx,0)[x], D−=∑xmax⁡(−nx,0)[x] are effective with disjoint supports, and D=D+−D−; the k-degree is deg⁡k(D)=∑xnx[κ(x):k] and deg⁡k:Div⁡(C)→Z is a group homomorphism, while deg⁡k(E)≥0 for every effective E≥0 (Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Divisor support positive negative parts, Degree divisor proper curve, Effective divisors have nonnegative degree).

[F2]

The one-point shift. For every divisor M on C and every closed point r∈C, χ(C,OC(M+[r]))=χ(C,OC(M))+[κ(r):k], and more generally χ(C,OC(M+E))=χ(C,OC(M))+deg⁡k(E) for every effective divisor E≥0; both identities hold in Z (Euler characteristic changes by the residue degree).

[F3]

Coherence and finiteness. For every divisor M on C the invertible sheaf OC(M) is a coherent OC-module, and Hq(C,OC(M)) is a finite-dimensional k-vector space for every q≥0 that vanishes for q≥2 (Finite-dimensionality of the Riemann-Roch space).

[F4]

The Euler characteristic of a coherent module F on the proper k-scheme C is χ(C,F)=∑q≥0(−1)qdim⁡kHq(C,F), a finite alternating sum of finite dimensions and hence an element of Z (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).

[F5]

Functoriality in the sheaf. For each q≥0 the assignment F↦Hq(C,F) is a covariant additive functor on abelian sheaves on C, so a morphism φ:F→G induces Hq(C,φ):Hq(C,F)→Hq(C,G) compatibly with identities and composites (Variance of sheaf cohomology); a functor sends isomorphisms to isomorphisms (Every functor preserves isomorphisms), so isomorphic sheaves have isomorphic cohomology groups in every degree and equal Euler characteristics.

[F6]

The current Cartier-to-Weil interface identifies the Weil divisors of this smooth proper curve with Cartier divisors and preserves their principal divisors (Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve). The associated sheaf is constructed with OC(D)⊆KC and OC(0)≅OC by Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor. These are the interfaces for every sheaf OC(M) in the chain.

[F7]

The Axiom of Choice is used through the Euler-characteristic supplier [F2], the finiteness and coherence supplier [F3], the Euler-characteristic definition [F4] and the Cartier-to-Weil interface [F6]. In ZF, AC implies DC by AC implies DC implies countable choice, so the DC premise of Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve is available from the stated assumption; no further selection is made below (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

Proof

technique · direct; split the divisor into positive and negative parts, expand each coefficient into that many single-point operations, walk the resulting finite chain through the divisor group while telescoping the one-point shifts of $\chi$, and observe that the total is a signed sum of residue degrees over a multiset that does not depend on the ordering
1.1F1

Decomposition. By [F1] the support of D=∑xnx[x] is a finite set of closed points, so D is a finite Z-linear combination of closed points. By [F1] the parts D+=∑xmax⁡(nx,0)[x] and D−=∑xmax⁡(−nx,0)[x] are effective divisors with disjoint supports and D=D+−D−. Since deg⁡k is a group homomorphism [F1], deg⁡k(D)=deg⁡k(D+)−deg⁡k(D−), and both terms are nonnegative integers because D+ and D− are effective [F1].

2.1F1step 1.1

The chain. In the free abelian group Div⁡(C) of [F1] one has ∑i[pi]=∑x∈Supp⁡(D+)nx[x]=D+ and ∑j[qj]=∑y∈Supp⁡(D−)(−ny)[y]=D−, because the listings repeat each point with its coefficient; hence ∑i[pi]−∑j[qj]=D+−D−=D by step 1.1. Define M0=0 and, for k=1,…,m+n, Mk=Mk−1+[rk] if the k-th symbol is +[rk] and Mk=Mk−1−[rk] if it is −[rk]; each Mk is an element of Div⁡(C), each successive difference Mk−Mk−1 is ±[rk] at the closed point rk, and the final term is Mm+n=∑i[pi]−∑j[qj]=D for every ordering, because addition in the abelian group Div⁡(C) is commutative and associative.

3.1F2F3F4step 2.1

The shift at each step. Let M∈Div⁡(C) and let r∈C be a closed point. Applying the one-point identity of [F2] to M gives χ(C,OC(M+[r]))=χ(C,OC(M))+[κ(r):k], and applying it to M−[r] in place of M gives χ(C,OC(M))=χ(C,OC(M−[r]))+[κ(r):k], that is, χ(C,OC(M−[r]))=χ(C,OC(M))−[κ(r):k]. All these values are defined: for every divisor M′ the sheaf OC(M′) is coherent by [F3], so [F4] applies to the proper k-scheme C. Consequently each step of the chain of step 2.1 changes the Euler characteristic by +[κ(rk):k] for a symbol +[rk] and by −[κ(rk):k] for a symbol −[rk].

4.1F1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Telescoping. Induction on k using step 3.1 gives χ(C,OC(Mk))=χ(C,OC(0))+∑j=1kεj[κ(rj):k], where εj=1 if the j-th symbol is an addition and εj=−1 if it is a removal. At k=m+n this is χ(C,OC(D))=χ(C,OC(0))+∑i[κ(pi):k]−∑j[κ(qj):k] by step 2.1, and the two sums are ∑x∈Supp⁡(D+)nx[κ(x):k]=deg⁡k(D+) and ∑y∈Supp⁡(D−)(−ny)[κ(y):k]=deg⁡k(D−) by the definition of the listings, so χ(C,OC(D))=χ(C,OC(0))+deg⁡k(D+)−deg⁡k(D−)=χ(C,OC(0))+deg⁡k(D) by step 1.1. The multiset of signed residue degrees {εj[κ(rj):k]} is determined by the listings alone, so this total, and hence the iterated value, is independent of the chosen ordering.

5.1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1∎

The base term and conclusion. The chain of step 2.1 starts at the zero divisor 0, whose attached sheaf is OC(0); the current dictionary [F6] identifies OC(0)≅OC with the structure sheaf, and by [F5] isomorphic sheaves have isomorphic cohomology in every degree, hence equal Euler characteristics, so χ(C,OC(0))=χ(C,OC). With step 4.1 this gives the asserted identity χ(C,OC(D))=χ(C,OC)+deg⁡k(D). Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 4.1 prove the decomposition, chain and order-independence clauses, so all three parts of the Statement hold. The Axiom of Choice is used only through the suppliers recorded in [F7], namely the one-point shift [F2], the coherence and finiteness of [F3], the Euler-characteristic definition [F4] and the current dictionary [F6], with DC supplied by AC as recorded there; no further selection is made, the listings of part 2 being finite and fixed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

100 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources