How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Doob upcrossing inequality
Statement
Assume AC. If is an integrable submartingale and , then for every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses, objects, and conventions in the Statement.
Upcrossing number of an interval defines without choosing crossing times.
Convex functions of martingales are submartingales and conditional Jensen show that a convex function of a submartingale is a submartingale when the displayed variables are integrable.
Nonnegative predictable transforms preserve submartingale gains gives nonnegative expected gain for bounded nonnegative predictable holdings.
The Axiom of Choice states AC, assumed here because the submartingale and predictable-transform interfaces require it.
Proof
Put . The function is convex and -Lipschitz up to an additive constant, so is integrable and is a submartingale by F2. Moreover iff , and iff ; therefore .
Define before the increment : it switches from to after the first observation at level , remains until an observation at least , then repeats. This rule depends only on , so is predictable. Let , also nonnegative and predictable.
Each completed holding interval contributes at least to . Any final incomplete holding starts at and contributes . Hence, pathwise, No maximizing tuple from F1 was selected.
Since , F3 gives , so step 2.1 yields The last subtracted term is nonnegative, proving the second inequality. AC is used exactly as stated in F4.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 5th ed., Theorem 4.2.10 (upcrossing inequality) with proof (standard reference, not scraped)