How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Effective fppf descent for separated locally quasi-finite morphisms
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the Zariski Main and descent suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a scheme and let be an fppf covering of an -scheme (Fppf coverings and the fppf site). If is a descent datum for schemes (Descent data for schemes over an fppf covering) and each is separated (Separated morphism of schemes) and locally quasi-finite (Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes), then the descent datum is effective: there is a scheme , separated and locally quasi-finite over , with compatible isomorphisms .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , an fppf covering of an -scheme , a descent datum with every separated and locally quasi-finite, and AC.
Fppf coverings are stable under base change and composition; effectivity of descent is preserved under refinement and is local on the base (Fppf coverings and the fppf site, Descent data for schemes over an fppf covering; Stacks Descent Lemma 35.36.2, tag 02W3, in the recorded source).
Flat locally finite-presentation morphisms are universally open, so their base changes are open maps (Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open).
A separated quasi-finite morphism to an affine scheme factors as an open immersion followed by a finite morphism; a finite morphism to an affine scheme has affine source (Scheme Zariski Main factorization for separated quasi-finite morphisms, Finite is affine and local on its target).
Under AC, morphisms descend uniquely along faithfully flat, quasi-compact, locally finitely presented covers when their two pullbacks agree (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent, The Axiom of Choice).
Separatedness and local quasi-finiteness are preserved under base change and composition with open immersions; a quasi-compact locally quasi-finite morphism is quasi-finite (Separated morphism of schemes, Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes, Fibre product of schemes).
Faithfully flat affine algebra descent is effective, with its invariant equalizer and compatible maps (Faithfully flat descent of modules and affine algebras is effective). Schemes glue along compatible open isomorphisms, by applying affine-chart gluing (Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms).
Proof
Given: The fppf descent datum of the Statement.
Affine refinement and reduction. Work on an affine open of the original target. Flat locally finitely presented maps are open by [F2], so finitely many affine source opens of the given covering have images covering this affine target. Their disjoint union gives a single affine faithfully flat finitely presented cover . Pull the datum back to it. Effectivity on such a refinement implies effectivity for the original datum: over each original member the two pulled-back schemes become compatibly isomorphic on its base change by , so [F4] descends the isomorphism and its inverse; uniqueness makes all cocycles agree. Local solutions on target affine opens likewise glue uniquely by [F4] and [F6]. It therefore suffices to treat this single affine cover. Write for the scheme with its datum. If the target is empty, the unique solution is the empty scheme.
Saturated quasi-compact opens. Let be an affine open and let be the descent transport. Set . It is open by [F2] and quasi-compact, since is affine and its continuous image is quasi-compact. The diagonal identity gives . The cocycle makes invariant under transport: applying two transports to a point has the same result as their composite. Points over a common base point may first be lifted to a common residue-field extension, since their residue-field tensor product is nonzero. This gives and restricts the datum to .
Quasi-affineness. The map is separated and locally quasi-finite by [F5]. It is quasi-compact: a distinguished open in the affine pulls back to the nonvanishing locus of a global function on the quasi-compact ; choose a finite affine cover of , where each such locus is principal affine. Thus is quasi-finite. By [F3] it is an open subscheme of a finite -scheme, which is affine, hence is quasi-affine. It is also separated over , since is affine.
Canonical affinization and flat base change. Put . The canonical map is an open immersion. To verify this, embed into an affine and cover this quasi-compact open by finitely many principal opens . For any quasi-compact separated scheme, sections are the equalizer of the finite products of the coordinate rings of a finite affine cover and its affine pair intersections; intersections are affine because the separated diagonal is closed in the product of the affine charts. Localizing this equalizer is exact and commutes with its finite products, so . Thus is an isomorphism on each onto and is an open immersion globally. The same equalizer shows that, for any flat ring extension , : tensor preserves this finite equalizer and the affine intersection rings base change. These identifications respect restriction and composition.
Effective descent of the quasi-affine piece. The two projections are flat. Therefore step 3.1 turns the datum on into an algebra descent datum on , satisfying its cocycle by functoriality. By [F6] it descends to an -algebra with . The canonical open immersion is compatible with that datum. Let be the faithfully flat finitely presented base change of . Its invariant open descends to the open : openness follows from [F2], and invariance says that any two points in one fibre either both lie in or both do not. The residue-field tensor argument of step 1.2 proves . Hence , with its original datum. This proves quasi-affine effectivity here without an external descent lemma.
Gluing the descended pieces. The saturated opens of step 1.2 cover . For two such opens, their intersection is an invariant open in each. Under the affine faithfully flat cover , invariance descends this intersection to an open of by the image argument of step 4.1, and likewise for the other piece. Their canonical upstairs identification descends with its inverse by [F4]. These identifications satisfy the cocycle by uniqueness of morphism descent. Glue the descended pieces by [F6], using their affine covers, to a scheme . Its pullback is the given , compatibly with the datum.
Descent of separatedness. The diagonal of becomes a closed immersion after the affine faithfully flat cover , because is separated. Closed immersions descend here: on an affine open of the diagonal target, its pullback is affine and the upstairs closed subscheme is specified by an ideal with the canonical descent datum. Module descent [F6] descends the inclusion to an ideal ; the ideal property is preserved by transport. The quotient base changes to the upstairs quotient. By [F4] the resulting closed subscheme and the original diagonal fibre product are isomorphic: descend their compatible upstairs isomorphism and its inverse. Thus the diagonal is a closed immersion, and is separated.
Descent of local quasi-finiteness. Restrict to an affine open over the affine . Its base change is affine and locally quasi-finite over , hence quasi-finite because it is quasi-compact. In particular is finitely generated as a -algebra. Finitely many tensor coefficients of such generators generate an -subalgebra whose tensor with surjects onto ; faithful flatness applied to the module gives . Thus is of finite type. For a point , choose a point of above it with residue field . The fibre algebra is finite-dimensional over : apply [F3] to the separated quasi-finite , whose fibre is an open subscheme of a finite fibre. A finite-dimensional algebra is Artinian; its prime spectrum is finite and discrete, and every open subscheme is a product of some of its local factors, hence again finite-dimensional. Linear independence is preserved by field extension, so is already finite-dimensional over . Its localizations at primes are finite-dimensional, which is the pointwise quasi-finite condition of [F5]. Each is therefore quasi-finite, and is locally quasi-finite. Undoing step 1.1 gives the entire original claim. AC is inherited from [F3], [F4], [F6] and the affine-cover choices.
Depends on
- Fppf coverings and the fppf site
- Descent data for schemes over an fppf covering
- Separated morphism of schemes
- Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes
- Flat morphism of schemes
- Locally finite presentation morphisms
- Fibre product of schemes
- Scheme Zariski Main factorization for separated quasi-finite morphisms
- Finite is affine and local on its target
- Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent
- Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open
- The Axiom of Choice
- Faithfully flat descent of modules and affine algebras is effective
- Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Chapter 37 (More on Morphisms), Section 37.57, Lemma 37.57.1 (standard reference, not scraped)