Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The energy identity on a truncated wave cone

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let n≥1, c>0, x0∈Rn, t0>0 and 0<t1<t2<t0; let K=K(t1,t2) be the space-time frustum of Truncated wave cones: convexity, piecewise C1 presentation and outward normals and let u∈C2 solve □cu=f on a neighbourhood of K‾ (Wave equation, Cauchy data and wave speed). With e,q as in Wave energy density, energy flux and total energy, Du the spatial gradient and

E(t):=∫Bc(t0−t)(x0)e(x,t) dx(t1≤t≤t2),

write ∂ru:=Du⋅x−x0∣x−x0∣ and Dtanu:=Du−(∂ru)x−x0∣x−x0∣ for the radial and tangential parts of Du on a sphere centred at x0. Then

∫Kf ut dx dt=E(t2)−E(t1)+∫t1t2 ⁣∫∂Bc(t0−t)(x0)ℓ dS dt,

where the lateral flux density ℓ:=c e−c2ut ∂ru=q⋅x−x0∣x−x0∣+c e satisfies

ℓ=c2((ut−c ∂ru)2+c2∣Dtanu∣2) ≥ 0.

Thus the lateral term is a sum of squares, vanishing identically exactly when ut=c ∂ru and Dtanu=0 on the lateral surface. In the homogeneous case f=0, the identity gives E(t2)≤E(t1) for t1<t2. Normalisation note. The density ℓ above is the one for which the sphere surface measure dS makes the displayed identity an identity: the lateral area element of K carries the graph factor 1+c2, which cancels the 1/1+c2 in V⋅ν, where V=(q,e), when dS is measured on the sphere ∂Bc(t0−t)(x0).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω; the frustum K=K(t1,t2) with its faces Db=B‾c(t0−t1)(x0)×{t1}, Dt=B‾c(t0−t2)(x0)×{t2} and lateral frustum L, edge set E the two rim spheres; a C2 function u solving □cu=f on a neighbourhood of K‾; the fields e=12(ut2+c2∣Du∣2), q=−c2utDu of Wave energy density, energy flux and total energy; the space-time field V:=(q,e) on Rn×R.

[F1]

Local conservation: ∂te+div⁡q=fut pointwise. (The local wave-energy conservation law)

[F2]

Piecewise divergence theorem: if Ω has a specified finite piecewise C1 presentation and F∈C1(Ω‾;Rn), then ∫Ωdiv⁡F=∑j∫SjF⋅νj dS, the faces counted once off the edge set E. (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations)

[F3]

The frustum K has the finite piecewise C1 presentation with faces Db,Dt,L and edge set the two rim spheres, with outward unit normals (0,−1) on Db, (0,1) on Dt, and ν=((x−x0)/∣x−x0∣,c)/1+c2 on L. (Truncated wave cones: convexity, piecewise C1 presentation and outward normals)

[F4]

On a compact embedded C1 hypersurface the chart integral is a finite Borel measure independent of charts; in graph coordinates X(y)=(y,h(y)) its density is 1+∣Dh(y)∣2, and on a one-sided boundary the outward unit normal agrees on chart overlaps. (Chart and partition independence of surface measure)

[F5]

The Euclidean inner product is symmetric and the orthogonal decomposition Du=(∂ru) x−x0^+Dtanu on a sphere centred at x0 gives ∣Du∣2=(∂ru)2+∣Dtanu∣2. (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn)

[F6]

Polar integration has radial density rn−1dr dσ; for n≥2 the polar measure equals chart surface measure and radius-r sphere integrals have factor rn−1. In n=1 each point of S0 has mass one and each lateral segment has length element 1+c2 dt. (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure)

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3

The divergence theorem applies to V=(q,e) on the frustum: u is C2 on a neighbourhood of K‾, so q and e are C1 there, and by [F1] the space-time divergence of V is div⁡(x,t)V=div⁡q+∂te=fut; since K has the finite piecewise C1 presentation [F3] with edge set of surface measure zero, [F2] gives ∫Kf ut dx dt=∫DbV⋅ν dS+∫DtV⋅ν dS+∫LV⋅ν dS.

2.1givenF3F4step 1.1algebra

The caps: with the outward normals (0,−1) on Db and (0,1) on Dt from [F3], the flux density on the bottom face is V⋅(0,−1)=−e and on the top face V⋅(0,1)=e, and the chart integral on a face contained in a coordinate hyperplane reduces to the n-dimensional Lebesgue integral of the trace by [F4]; hence ∫DbV⋅ν dS=−∫Bc(t0−t1)(x0)e(x,t1) dx=−E(t1) and ∫DtV⋅ν dS=E(t2), so the two caps contribute E(t2)−E(t1).

2.2givenF3F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

The lateral face: by [F3] the outward unit normal on L is ν=(x−x0^,c)/1+c2, so V⋅ν=(q⋅x−x0^+ce)/1+c2=ℓ/1+c2 with ℓ:=q⋅x−x0^+ce; parametrizing the lateral frustum by (ω,t)↦(x0+c(t0−t)ω,t) over Sn−1×[t1,t2], or equivalently using the graph density 1+1/c2 of [F4] for the graph t=t0−∣x−x0∣/c, the graph density and polar integration [F6], with r=c(t0−t) and ∣dr∣=c dt, give area element 1+c2 [c(t0−t)]n−1dω dt, so ∫LV⋅ν dS=∫t1t2∫Sn−1ℓ [c(t0−t)]n−1dω dt=∫t1t2∫∂Bc(t0−t)(x0)ℓ dS dt; and, since q⋅x−x0^=−c2ut∂ru, the density is ℓ=ce−c2ut∂ru=c2(ut2+c2∣Du∣2)−c2ut∂ru=c2((ut−c∂ru)2+c2(∣Du∣2−(∂ru)2))=c2((ut−c∂ru)2+c2∣Dtanu∣2)≥0 by [F5], with equality exactly when both squares vanish.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

Substituting steps 2.1 and 2.2 into the identity of step 1.1 gives ∫Kf ut dx dt=E(t2)−E(t1)+∫t1t2∫∂Bc(t0−t)(x0)ℓ dS dt with ℓ=c2((ut−c∂ru)2+c2∣Dtanu∣2)≥0, ℓ vanishing identically on L exactly when ut=c∂ru and Dtanu=0 there; this is the displayed identity and the sum-of-squares form.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources