Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Expander size adjustment and laziness

Statement

For every integer N1 there is a polynomial-time constructible reverse-paired 128-regular multigraph HN on exactly N vertices with α(HN)ρ0:=1491638400<1. For N2 every S satisfies cut(S)(7/10)min(S,NS). Every vertex has loops.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

For every m2 the normalized Margulis adjacency has absolute nontrivial norm α73/80, hence algebraic gap at least 7/80. For m=1 the mean-zero space is zero and α=0. (Margulis family has uniform spectral gap).

[F2]

For a finite d-regular adjacency-slot multigraph on n2 vertices, γ2h2γ,hhVdh. Here γ=1μ2 is the algebraic gap; it is not replaced by 1α. (Cheeger inequalities for finite regular graphs).

Proof

1.1

For N2 put m=N. The Margulis graph has algebraic gap at least 7/80, so Cheeger's lower bound gives unnormalized cut ratio at least 8(7/80)/2=7/20. Partition its m2 vertices, in fixed lexicographic order, into N nonempty consecutive fibers of size at most four. Such a partition exists since Nm24N, by allocating one vertex per fiber and distributing the remainder up to the capacity four.

F1F2
2.1

Sum adjacency entries across fibers to form the quotient, retaining internal slots on its diagonal. Every row has sum at most 32; pad its diagonal to row sum 32. For a quotient cut, the two lifts each have at least as many vertices as their respective sets of fibers. The old cut lower bound therefore yields at least (7/20)min(S,NS) crossing slots. Padding changes no cut, so the degree-32 graph has normalized h7/640.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Cheeger's other direction yields algebraic gap at least h2/249/819200. Add 32 diagonal slots at each vertex. The normalized matrix becomes (I+M)/2, all its eigenvalues lie in [0,1], and its nontrivial norm is at most 149/1638400. Double all slots, giving degree 128 with even diagonal and unchanged normalized matrix. Cuts double, giving the claimed 7/10 unnormalized ratio.

F2step 2.1
4.1

Symmetry and even diagonal allow explicit reverse pairing: match opposite off-diagonal slots, and pair diagonal slots in order. At least the added loops remain at every vertex. Integer square-root search, fiber allocation, summation, and padding operate on O(N) slots with polynomial-length labels, in polynomial bit time. For N=1 output 128 loop slots; its mean-zero norm is zero and all cut assertions are vacuous.

step 3.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources