Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exponential Euler has a second-order local defect

Statement

In the finite-matrix setting of Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps, let 0≤t<t+h≤T and let y solve y′=Ay+g(r,y(r)) on [t,t+h], with admissible states and stages. Put q(r):=g(r,y(r)). Suppose q is continuously differentiable with sup⁡t≤r≤t+h∥q′(r)∥2≤Q1, and let K+:=sup⁡0≤s≤T∥esA∥2. Then the exact-start local defect of the exponential Euler map satisfies ∥ΨhE(t,y(t))−y(t+h)∥2≤K+Q12h2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact semilinear solution, its forcing curve q, the finite matrix, and the bounds in the Statement.

[F1]

Variation of constants for a finite-matrix semilinear system: y(t+h)=ehAy(t)+∫0he(h−s)Aq(t+s) ds.

[F2]

Exponential Euler and the two-stage ETD2 step maps: ΨhE(t,y(t))=ehAy(t)+hφ1(hA)q(t).

[F3]

Integral representations of the first two phi functions: hφ1(hA)q(t)=∫0he(h−s)Aq(t) ds.

[F4]

If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz: a continuously differentiable vector curve with derivative norm bounded by Q1 is Q1-Lipschitz on its closed interval, including its endpoints.

[A1]

The forcing derivative obeys the stated bound Q1, and ∥esA∥2≤K+ for 0≤s≤h.

[F6]

A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||, Every finite-dimensional normed space is Banach, and The exponential series of a bounded operator: for finite A on Cd, ∥esA∥2≤e∣s∣∥A∥2. For 0≤s≤T, nonnegativity of ∥A∥2 gives s∥A∥2≤T∥A∥2, so scalar exponential monotonicity (The exponential function is strictly increasing) gives es∥A∥2≤eT∥A∥2. The set defining K+ contains ∥Id∥2 at s=0 and is therefore bounded above by eT∥A∥2; completeness of R (Dedekind completeness: the least-upper-bound property) supplies its finite supremum.

[F7]

C is the real coordinate plane, with coordinate arithmetic, The standard formulas ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn and ∑k<nxkyk‾ on Cn are inner products, and The norm ∥v∥=⟨v,v⟩ induced by a real or complex inner product: for v=(v0,…,vd−1), Φd(v):=(Re⁡v0,Im⁡v0,…,Re⁡vd−1,Im⁡vd−1) is real-linear and satisfies ∥Φd(v)∥R2d2=∑j<d∣vj∣2=∥v∥22. It maps real-time difference quotients to realified difference quotients and preserves their limits, so q and its derivative are legitimate real vector data for [F4] with the same norm bound.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F6algebra

By [F6], K+ is finite. Subtract [F1] from [F2] and replace the constant forcing term by its integral form [F3]. The local defect is ∫0he(h−s)A(q(t)−q(t+s)) ds.

2.1F4F5F7A1step 1.1algebra∎

By [F4], [F7], and [A1], ∥q(t+s)−q(t)∥2≤Q1s. The semigroup factor has norm at most K+; [F5] bounds the norm of step 1.1 by K+Q1∫0hs ds=K+Q1h2/2.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources