How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Faithfully flat descent of modules and algebras is effective
Statement
Let be a faithfully flat homomorphism. A descent datum on a -module is a -linear isomorphism between its two pullbacks, written as transport from the first copy to the second, satisfying over . Such data form a category equivalent, by base change, to -modules. The same holds for commutative unital algebras. If is an algebra and the transport is an algebra isomorphism, its descended algebra is with the two tensor expressions interpreted in the respective pullbacks. The natural map is an isomorphism compatible with the datum. No finiteness or Noetherian hypothesis is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A faithfully flat ring map , a -module and the descent isomorphism in the Statement.
Tensoring with a faithfully flat algebra preserves exact sequences and reflects zero modules, hence reflects isomorphisms (Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms, A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).
The associativity isomorphism for tensor products identifies iterated pullbacks (Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules); affine schemes and rings are contravariantly equivalent (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings).
Proof
First consider a cover with a section and a module on with the given transport. Put . Pull back along , . This gives an isomorphism . Its compatibility with the original datum follows by pulling the cocycle identity back along on . Pulling the cocycle back to the diagonal shows that diagonal transport is an invertible idempotent and hence the identity. Pulling back along then shows that reverse transport is the inverse. These identities prove both effectiveness and that a map between descended objects is determined uniquely by its pullback: its descent-compatible upstairs map is recovered by pulling back along the section. This argument applies to affine modules, and to algebras when the transports preserve multiplication and unit.
Define to be the equalizer inside displayed in the Statement, considered as an -module. Flat tensor product preserves this equalizer. For any flat base extension , the invariant module for the base-changed datum is therefore , since it is the kernel of the base-changed difference of the two transport maps. Take . The new covering ring is and has a retraction given by multiplication; equivalently its affine covering has a section. By step 1.1 the base-changed datum is effective. For an effective datum coming from a module , the invariant equalizer is : for a split cover, apply the section to an invariant element to recover its unique downstairs element. Thus the base change of is an isomorphism. Faithful flatness in [F1] proves that the original map is an isomorphism.
For completeness, the invariant equalizer of the canonical datum on is also before this split base change. Indeed becomes a split exact equalizer after tensoring with : multiplication supplies the section and step 1.1 applies. Its kernel and cokernel are detected by [F1]. Consequently a descent-compatible map takes invariants to invariants, and the isomorphisms of step 2.1 identify it uniquely with the base change of that restricted -linear map. This proves full faithfulness as well as effectiveness.
If is an algebra, its invariant subset is closed under sums, products, scalar multiplication and the unit because is an algebra isomorphism. It is therefore an -algebra. The map of step 2.1 is an algebra homomorphism and an isomorphism of modules, hence an algebra isomorphism. Restriction to invariants preserves algebra maps and step 3.1 proves their full faithfulness. This proves both equivalences and the displayed construction.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- SGA 1, Exposé VIII §§1–2; Exposé V §§3–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Descent §§4–7 and Fundamental Groups §§3, 5–6 (standard reference, not scraped)