Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite étale algebras have finite locally free underlying modules

Statement

Assume AC. For a commutative ring A and a module-finite commutative A-algebra D, finite presentation as an A-module is equivalent to finite presentation as an A-algebra. Consequently Spec⁡D→Spec⁡A is finite étale if and only if D is finitely presented and flat as an A-module and ΩD/A=0. Its underlying module is finite projective and locally free of finite rank; that rank is locally constant and is the number of geometric points in a fibre. No Noetherian hypothesis on A is required.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a ring A, and a module-finite commutative A-algebra D.

[F1]

A module-finite algebra is integral: if D≠0, apply Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element to the image of A in D, using D as a faithful finite module over each subalgebra generated by one element. For D=0, the monic polynomial T suffices. Étale means flat, unramified and locally finitely presented; a quasi-compact separated locally finitely presented morphism is finitely presented, so this applies to a finite affine map. For finite-type algebras unramifiedness is equivalent to Ω=0 (Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, Formal unramifiedness iff Omega vanishes).

[F2]

Nakayama's lemma lifts a finite residue-field generating set and detects a zero finite module; a short exact sequence with flat quotient remains exact after tensoring (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators, A short exact sequence with flat quotient remains short exact after tensoring).

[F3]

AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice); it is inherited through the étale criterion and the stated Nakayama supplier. The choices below are finite choices at each local ring.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

Suppose D is finitely presented as an A-algebra. Choose finite algebra generators d1,…,dr and monic equations Pi(di)=0 by [F1]. The kernel of A[T1,…,Tr]→D is a finitely generated ideal: a finite presentation with a different generating list converts to this one by adding both finite lists, imposing the finitely many equations expressing each list in the other, and eliminating the extra variables. Put C=A[T1,…,Tr]/(P1,…,Pr). Reduction by the monic polynomials gives a finite free A-basis of C consisting of the monomials ∏Tiei with 0≤ei<deg⁡Pi. The kernel J of C→D is a finitely generated C-ideal, so multiplication of its finitely many ideal generators by this finite A-basis generates J as an A-module. Thus D has a finite A-module presentation.

1.2F2F3construct

Let M be any finitely presented flat A-module. At a prime p, choose lifts of a basis of Mp/pMp. By [F2] they give a surjection Apn→Mp. Its kernel K is finitely generated because Mp is finitely presented: this follows for any finite free surjection by adjoining a fixed finite presentation and eliminating its finitely many auxiliary generators. Tensoring with the residue field is exact by flatness and [F2], and the last map is the chosen basis isomorphism. Thus K/pK=0, so K=0 by Nakayama. The local module is free.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Conversely, choose module generators 1=d0,d1,…,dr and finitely many generators of their A-linear relations. Present an algebra with variables T0,…,Tr, relation T0=1, those finitely many linear relations, and the finitely many multiplication relations TiTj=∑kaijkTk expressing products in D. Every polynomial in this presented algebra reduces to an A-linear combination of the Ti, by induction on its degree. The map to D is surjective; a linear combination mapping to zero is a combination of the imposed module relations, so the map is injective. This is a finite algebra presentation. Applying [F1] proves the asserted étale criterion.

3.1F1step 2.1step 1.2algebra

The local basis established in step 1.2 spreads to a principal neighbourhood of p. Represent the basis and its inverse over the local ring using finitely many denominators. The inverse is a map from a finitely presented module, so its values on the finite generators and the finitely many relations are defined after inverting one element outside p. The two composition identities are identities on finitely many generators and therefore also hold after one further localization. Hence M is free on a neighbourhood of every prime. The resulting rank function is locally constant. Applied to D, its geometric fibre is a finite-dimensional algebra with zero differentials over an algebraically closed field; étaleness, or equivalently the zero-dimensional geometrically regular fibre in its definition, makes it a product of copies of that field. The product description is Finite and finite type etale schemes over an algebraically closed field. Its vector-space dimension is the local rank of D, proving the fibre-count assertion.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

A finite locally free, finitely presented module is projective. To see this explicitly, take finitely many principal opens D(ai) on which it is free. Local basis vectors and dual coordinate maps have finitely many denominators, since the module is finitely presented. Clearing these denominators expresses aiNiid⁡M as a finite sum of maps m↦λ(m)v, with v∈M and λ∈Hom⁡A(M,A). The powers aiNi generate the unit ideal because the principal opens cover the spectrum. A linear combination equal to 1 therefore expresses id⁡M as a finite dual-basis sum. The associated maps M→Ar→M compose to the identity, so M is a summand of a finite free module and hence projective. This completes the strengthened assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources