Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite étale algebras lift uniquely through nilpotent thickenings

Statement

Assume AC. For a commutative ring A and a nilpotent ideal I⊆A, reduction gives an equivalence from finite étale A-algebras to finite étale A/I-algebras. Thus every such algebra lifts, and every map between reductions lifts uniquely. This is equivalence of algebras, or contravariantly of finite étale affine covers; it asserts no algebraization on a nonaffine proper scheme.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, A, nilpotent I, and a finite étale algebra D0 over A/I.

[F1]

Finite étale algebras are finite projective and are characterized by finite presentation, flatness and vanishing differentials (Finite étale algebras have finite locally free underlying modules). Their positive Hochschild cochains admit the explicit contraction h of The diagonal of a finite étale algebra contracts its positive Hochschild cochains.

[F2]

Étale algebras lift ring maps uniquely through square-zero ideals, hence through nilpotent ideals by successive lifting (Etale morphisms are the formally etale morphisms locally of finite presentation). Differentials commute with base change; Nakayama detects zero finite modules modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical (Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators).

[F3]

AC is assumed through the suppliers in [F1]–[F2] (The Axiom of Choice); the algebra lifting uses only finite projective splittings and finite sums after those suppliers are available.

Proof

1.1F1constructalgebra

First assume I2=0. Lift the finite projective module D0 to a finite projective A-module P. Explicitly, write D0 as the image of an idempotent matrix over A/I, lift that matrix to p, and put ϵ=p2−p. Then p commutes with ϵ, ϵ2=0, and p′=p+(1−2p)ϵ has (p′)2=p′ and the same reduction; take P=im⁡p′. The locus where D0 has rank zero is open and closed by [F1]; its idempotent lifts by the same scalar formula. On that factor lift by zero. On the complementary factor the unit of D0 is unimodular: at every prime it is a nonzero unit in a nonzero fibre algebra, so the ideal of its values under the dual module is the unit ideal. Hence it admits a functional λ0 with λ0(1)=1. Lift the unit to u∈P and the functional to λ:P→A by projectivity. Since λ(u) reduces to 1 and I is nilpotent it is invertible; rescale λ so that λ(u)=1. Thus P=Au⊕ker⁡λ.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Lift the multiplication on D0 to an A-bilinear multiplication μ on P with unit u. Set the products involving u as required by the unit, and lift the product on ker⁡λ⊗Aker⁡λ using its projectivity. Its associator a(v,w,z)=μ(μ(v,w),z)−μ(v,μ(w,z)) takes values in IP. It vanishes if any input is u and factors through D0 in each input, because I2=0. The left and right D0-actions on IP are well-defined from the reduced multiplication. Expanding the five terms of δa shows that they cancel: each nested triple product occurs twice with opposite signs, while changing brackets inside a term involving a is harmless modulo I2. Thus a is a normalized Hochschild 3-cocycle. By [F1], b=ha is a normalized 2-cochain with δb=a. Replace μ by μ+b, interpreting b as a map P⊗AP→IP. The new associator is a−δb=0; terms involving two values of b vanish because I2=0. The unit is preserved by normalization.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The associative lifted algebra is commutative. For each v∈P, the inner derivation w↦vw−wv has values in IP, vanishes on IP, and hence defines a derivation D0→IP. The bimodule IP is symmetric, since its actions come from the commutative reduced algebra. By [F1], every 1-cocycle is the coboundary of an element of this bimodule, and such a coboundary is w↦wm−mw=0. Thus the inner derivation vanishes. The lifted algebra is finite projective as a module and therefore finitely presented and flat. Its finite module of differentials reduces to ΩD0/(A/I)=0 by [F2]; nilpotence, or Nakayama, makes it zero. By [F1] the lifted algebra is finite étale.

4.1F1F2F3step 3.1∎

If IN=0, lift successively through A/Ij+1→A/Ij for 1≤j<N; each kernel is square-zero because 2j≥j+1. Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 give existence at each stage. Given two finite étale lifts and a map between their reductions, apply the unique infinitesimal lifting in [F2] to the source algebra and to the nilpotent quotient of the target algebra. This yields one and only one algebra map upstairs. Identities and compositions are preserved by uniqueness, proving full faithfulness. Together with existence this proves the equivalence. The AC use is exactly the inherited use in [F3].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources