How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Algebraically closed field extension preserves covers of a smooth proper scheme
Statement
Assume AC. Let be algebraically closed fields and a smooth proper -scheme, not necessarily projective or connected. Pullback is an equivalence If is connected and is a geometric basepoint of with image on , the equivalence preserves their fibre functors and induces an isomorphism .
For any field , any finite purely inseparable extension , and any -scheme , pullback is also an equivalence. Consequently a finite étale cover whose coefficients descend to a finite algebraic extension of a trait fraction field can discard its purely inseparable part: it descends to the maximal separable subextension.
This is a new local support item for A911. Smooth proper geometric fibres are its exact intended application. The proof below uses smoothness for essential surjectivity through complete DVR lifting; the full-faithfulness argument works for any finite type -scheme. The stronger arbitrary proper assertion in the sources is not needed or claimed here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, algebraically closed , and smooth proper .
A nonempty finite type scheme over an algebraically closed field has a rational closed point, including after localization in finitely many nonzero elements (Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal).
Finite étale covers and their arrows descend effectively along fpqc covers; finite étale covers can be trivialized by finite étale covers. Graphs and equalizers of their maps are open and closed, and finite étale rank-one maps are isomorphisms (Finite étale covers descend effectively along fpqc covers, Finite étale covers admit connected Galois trivializations and subgroup quotients).
Restriction from a smooth proper scheme over a complete Noetherian DVR to its closed fibre is an equivalence, without assuming projectivity (Finite étale covers of a smooth proper family over a complete DVR are determined by the closed fibre).
A finite type reduced scheme over a perfect field has a dense regular locus, regular is smooth over that field, and smooth schemes have local étale maps to affine space. Étale maps have unique infinitesimal lifting. Nonempty finite type schemes over an algebraically closed field have rational closed points (Dense regular loci on every component, Regular equals smooth over a perfect field, Smooth maps have étale local affine-space form, Etale morphisms are the formally etale morphisms locally of finite presentation, Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal).
The cover/fibre-functor classification and profinite topology are Finite étale covers are equivalent to finite continuous étale fundamental group sets. AC (The Axiom of Choice) is inherited from [F1]–[F5] and is used for common field extensions below. Algebraic closures exist under AC (Assuming Choice, every field has an algebraic closure).
Finite étale algebras and their maps lift uniquely across a nilpotent ideal (Finite étale algebras lift uniquely through nilpotent thickenings). Applied on affine opens, the unique maps agree on overlaps, so the same fully faithful equivalence holds for finite étale covers of schemes across nilpotent closed immersions; local algebra lifts glue uniquely. An algebraic extension is purely inseparable over its maximal separable subextension (An algebraic extension is purely inseparable over its separable closure).
Proof
Every integral finite type -scheme remains integral after any field extension . On an affine chart with domain , suppose in with nonzero. Express as finite linear combinations of elements of a -basis of . Their coefficients lie in a finitely generated -domain . Since vector spaces are flat, is injective, so the same equality holds over . Choose a nonzero coefficient of and a nonzero coefficient of . By [F1] there is a -point of avoiding their product. Specializing there gives two nonzero elements of whose product is zero, a contradiction. Thus is a domain. Affine charts of an integral scheme have nonempty overlaps, which stay nonempty after faithful field extension; the domain charts therefore glue to an integral scheme. For any finite type -scheme , apply this to the reduced structures of its finitely many irreducible components. Their base changes are irreducible and still give all the irreducible components: each has a nonempty open subset disjoint from the others, and nonemptiness persists after faithful extension. Intersections are nonempty before extension exactly when they are nonempty afterwards. The finite graph whose vertices are irreducible components and edges are nonempty intersections has connected components exactly the connected components of : a partition without edges gives disjoint closed unions, each also open, while a connected graph glues connected irreducible pieces into a connected union. Hence every connected component stays connected, and every open and closed subscheme of is the base change of a unique open and closed subscheme of .
Let be finite étale. It spreads to a finite étale cover for a finitely generated -subalgebra . Here is the finite-data argument: take a finite affine cover of proper separated ; its intersections are affine. On each chart a finite locally free algebra is specified by a finite idempotent matrix presenting its projective module, multiplication and unit matrices, and their finitely many identities. Étaleness is specified by a separability idempotent in its tensor square, with multiplication equal to one and annihilated by all differences for a finite set of algebra generators. This description follows after the trivializations in [F2] and descends there; conversely it makes the diagonal an open and closed immersion and gives the finite locally free étale condition. The finitely many gluing isomorphisms and their inverses on chart intersections also use only finitely many coefficients and identities. Collect those coefficients from ; enlarge to include coefficients witnessing every equality and inverse. Thus these algebra presentations and gluings give the asserted cover over . The same argument spreads any specified maps between such covers. The domain has a dense smooth open by [F4], since algebraically closed is perfect. Localize in a nonzero element so that a rational point lies in that smooth open, and further shrink around it to obtain an étale map to by [F4]. None of these localizations changes the given base change to .
For the purely inseparable assertion choose such that every element of has th power in ; characteristic zero gives the identity case. The multiplication map has kernel generated by finitely many , for field generators of . Each generator has th power zero, so this finitely generated ideal is nilpotent. Thus the diagonal of in its self-fibre-product over is a nilpotent closed immersion. For any cover , its two pullbacks to the self-fibre-product restrict to the same cover on that diagonal. By [F6] the identity there lifts uniquely to an isomorphism between those pullbacks. On the triple fibre product the diagonal is likewise nilpotent, and uniqueness forces the cocycle identity. Effective fpqc descent in [F2] gives a cover on . Maps descend as well: their two pullbacks agree because they agree on the diagonal and [F6] is faithful. This proves the asserted equivalence for arbitrary . For a finite algebraic extension , its maximal separable subextension has purely inseparable; apply the just-proved assertion to . No separability of the original coefficients is presumed.
Given finite étale , their internal Hom is represented by a finite étale . Indeed work on each of the finitely many connected components of and then take their disjoint union; after a common finite étale trivializing cover from [F2], replace by finite constant sets and take the constant cover with fibre the finite set of all functions . Changes of trivialization act by precomposition and postcomposition; those actions satisfy the cocycle law, so [F2] descends this cover. The evaluation morphism descends with it. Sections of are therefore exactly maps , and this construction commutes with base change. Since is of finite type over , step 1.1 applies. The image of a section over is open and closed in by [F2], hence is the pullback of a unique open and closed . The finite étale map has degree one after faithful field extension, thus degree one before extension, and is an isomorphism by [F2]. Its inverse gives the unique descended section. This proves full faithfulness of for every field extension when is algebraically closed, using only finite type. Apply this argument also with any algebraically closed extension as the initial ground field.
We construct a generically injective arc through , including in positive characteristic. Choose positive integers with , and for put . These series are algebraically independent over . To verify this, take a nonzero polynomial of total degree at most . Truncate each series after the same . For large , the degrees increase so rapidly that the degrees of the distinct monomials in evaluated on these truncated polynomials are distinct: comparing exponent vectors at their highest differing index, its contribution is larger than times the sum of all preceding degrees. Thus the largest-degree monomial has a unique nonzero leading term, and evaluated on the truncations is nonzero of degree at most . The first omitted term has degree , so substitution of the full series cannot change that nonzero polynomial's coefficients through its degree. Hence . Add the coordinates of to the and map the coordinate ring of affine space to . The étale chart at lifts this map uniquely from through for all by [F4]. Taking the compatible inverse limit of images of finitely many generators gives , reducing to . This map is injective: it is injective on the polynomial coordinate ring by the independence just proved, and the generic algebra of the étale integral chart over its polynomial coordinates is a finite field extension. Localizing the map at all nonzero coordinate polynomials therefore gives a unital map from that field to , which is injective. When , and the constant arc has the same required property.
Put and . Pull back along the arc to a cover of the smooth proper constant family . Its closed fibre is a finite étale cover . By [F3], and are isomorphic: full faithfulness lifts the closed-fibre identification and its inverse. Thus as covers of . Both and contain by step 2.2. Their tensor product over is nonzero (tensoring two nonzero vector spaces over a field is nonzero). Choose a prime of that tensor product, take its quotient fraction field and then an algebraic closure . Both fields embed in , since the kernel of a unital map from a field is zero, and their embeddings agree on . Consequently the two original covers and become isomorphic over . By step 2.1 applied over the algebraically closed ground field , that isomorphism and its inverse descend uniquely to . Therefore , proving essential surjectivity.
Full faithfulness and essential surjectivity prove the equivalence. For the stated basepoints, a finite étale cover over the algebraically closed field of a geometric point is a finite disjoint union of points; further algebraically closed field extension preserves that point set. Hence the equivalence identifies the geometric fibre functors naturally. Conjugating their automorphisms through the equivalence gives the asserted group isomorphism; the topology is preserved because kernels of actions on finite fibres are a neighbourhood basis by [F5]. The AC use is exactly that of [F5] and the selections in steps 1.2, 2.2 and 3.1.
Depends on
- Assuming Choice, every field has an algebraic closure
- An algebraic extension is purely inseparable over its separable closure
- The Axiom of Choice
- Finite étale algebras lift uniquely through nilpotent thickenings
- Finite étale covers descend effectively along fpqc covers
- Finite étale covers admit connected Galois trivializations and subgroup quotients
- Finite étale covers of a smooth proper family over a complete DVR are determined by the closed fibre
- Dense regular loci on every component
- Regular equals smooth over a perfect field
- Smooth maps have étale local affine-space form
- Etale morphisms are the formally etale morphisms locally of finite presentation
- Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal
- Finite étale covers are equivalent to finite continuous étale fundamental group sets
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- SGA 1, recomposed edition, Expose X Corollary 1.8, printed pages 204-205 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Fundamental Groups of Schemes, section 9 Lemmas 9.1 and 9.3, Tags 0A48 and 0A49 (standard reference, not scraped)