Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite étale covers descend effectively along fpqc covers

Statement

Assume AC. Let p:S′→S be faithfully flat and quasi-compact. Pullback gives an equivalence between finite étale S-schemes and finite étale S′-schemes equipped with an isomorphism of their two pullbacks to S′×SS′ satisfying the cocycle identity over S′×SS′×SS′. Morphisms in the latter category must commute with these isomorphisms. This includes effectiveness, uniqueness up to unique compatible isomorphism, and descent of morphisms. The base schemes need not be Noetherian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the fpqc map p, and a finite étale cover upstairs with its cocycle datum.

[F1]

Effective descent for modules and algebras is the invariant/equalizer construction for a faithfully flat affine ring map (Faithfully flat descent of modules and algebras is effective).

[F2]

A module-finite algebra is finite étale exactly when its module is finitely presented and flat and its differentials vanish (Finite étale algebras have finite locally free underlying modules). Flatness descends faithfully flatly and differentials commute with base change (Flatness descends along faithfully flat base change, Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change).

[F3]

Affine spectra represent algebras and their maps; affine-local algebra sheaves glue their relative spectra (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings, Glue relative spectra of affine-local algebras). Flatness is affine local and a flat affine map surjective on spectra is faithfully flat (Affine-local flatness, A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).

[F4]

The meaning of fpqc is faithfully flat and quasi-compact (Fpqc covering morphisms). AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice) through the finite-étale suppliers of [F2] and the affine-chart suppliers; finite refinements below use only finite choices once an affine cover is fixed.

Proof

1.1F1construct

For an affine faithfully flat map A→B, let N be the upstairs finite étale B-algebra and let D be its invariant algebra. By [F1], D⊗AB≅N. To descend finite generation, express finitely many B-module generators of N as finite sums of tensors d⊗b. The finitely many occurring d generate a submodule D0 whose base change surjects onto N. Thus (D/D0)⊗AB=0, and faithful flatness gives D=D0.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Choose a finite free surjection Ar→D with kernel K. Flatness of B/A identifies K⊗AB with the kernel of Br→N. This kernel is finitely generated because N is finitely presented as a B-module by [F2]; the assertion for an arbitrary finite free surjection follows by comparing it with a fixed finite presentation and eliminating finitely many auxiliary generators. Applying the same finite-tensor-generator argument as step 1.1 to K proves that K is finitely generated. Hence D is finitely presented as an A-module. It is flat by [F2]. Since ΩD/A⊗AB≅ΩN/B=0, faithful flatness gives ΩD/A=0. Therefore D is finite étale by [F2]. Maps descend with their algebra structures by [F1], proving the entire assertion for affine faithfully flat maps.

3.1F3F4step 2.1construct

Now restrict the target to an affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆S. By [F4], SU′ is quasi-compact, so choose finitely many affine opens Vj=Spec⁡Bj covering it. Their disjoint union is affine, with ring B=∏jBj. The map A→B is flat and surjective on spectra, hence faithfully flat by [F3]. Pull the upstairs cover and cocycle back to this disjoint union, and use steps 1.1 and 2.1 to construct a finite étale cover of U. Its pullback is canonically the given cover on each Vj; the isomorphisms agree on intersections because their restrictions to Vj×UVk are precisely the original descent datum. Thus they glue to identify its pullback over all of SU′ with the original cover and datum.

4.1F1F3F4step 2.1step 3.1∎

On the intersections of two affine opens of S, cover the intersection by affine opens and repeat step 3.1. Full faithfulness in step 2.1 makes the resulting comparison isomorphisms unique after requiring compatibility upstairs; uniqueness makes them agree on further overlaps and satisfy the cocycle identity. The algebras and then their relative spectra glue by [F3]. Finiteness and étaleness are affine local, so the glued cover has both properties. A compatible upstairs morphism descends on these affine opens by [F1] and its unique local descents agree, hence glue. This proves the claimed equivalence, including effectiveness and uniqueness, over arbitrary base schemes. AC is used through the suppliers recorded in [F4].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources