How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The diagonal of a finite étale algebra contracts its positive Hochschild cochains
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a finite étale algebra over a commutative ring . There exists with For any -bimodule whose left and right -actions agree, define the Hochschild differential on -multilinear cochains by For , satisfies . In particular every positive-degree cocycle is a coboundary. If vanishes whenever an input is , so does in positive degree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the algebra and its bimodule , with agreeing left and right -actions.
A finite étale map has open diagonal and is separated, so its diagonal is open and closed (Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, An unramified morphism has an open diagonal, Finite morphisms are integral and universally closed). A finite étale algebra is finite projective (Finite étale algebras have finite locally free underlying modules). AC is inherited through these suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The open and closed diagonal in corresponds to an idempotent on whose summand the multiplication map is an isomorphism, while the complementary summand is its kernel. Hence . For , is in that kernel and therefore annihilates . Expressing the tensor as a finite sum gives the asserted identities.
Agreement of the two -actions makes preserve -multilinearity and makes the tensor formula for well-defined. Expand using the displayed differential. The initial term in is . Every term combining two adjacent inputs cancels with its counterpart of opposite sign in , and the last right-action terms cancel as well. The remaining pair is , which is zero by and multilinearity. Thus for . For a cocycle , this gives . An input equal to after the inserted first input still makes each summand zero, proving the normalization assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- SGA 1, Exposé I §8 and Exposé IX §1; étale lifting through nilpotent ideals (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Étale Morphisms §15, Theorems 15.1–15.2; alternate separability proof expanded here (standard reference, not scraped)