How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite étale covers of a projective flat family over a complete DVR lift uniquely
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a complete Noetherian DVR with uniformizer , and let be projective and flat over . Write for . Restriction is an equivalence between finite étale covers of and of . No smoothness or normality of is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , , and a finite étale cover on .
Projective coherent Čech groups are finite, high twists have vanishing positive cohomology and are globally generated (Projective Čech finiteness and Serre vanishing for the étale lifting construction).
Finite étale algebras are finite locally free and lift with their maps uniquely through nilpotent ideals (Finite étale algebras have finite locally free underlying modules, Finite étale algebras lift uniquely through nilpotent thickenings). Applying this on affine charts and using uniqueness glues the lifts on nilpotent scheme thickenings.
Finite modules over complete are complete, and finite modules at local rings are separated for an ideal in the maximal ideal. Nakayama lifts finite generating sets (Completion of a finite module is extension of scalars, The Krull intersection is the -torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators). Relative spectra of affine-local algebras glue; flatness, finite presentation and vanishing differentials give étaleness, and differentials commute with base change (Glue relative spectra of affine-local algebras, Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change). AC is inherited through [F1]–[F3] (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
For any finite locally free sheaf on , multiplication by is injective because is flat over . Its exact quotient sequence gives Here the groups are the Čech groups in [F1], and the sequence follows from its exact-sequence calculation. The transition map on the last group is multiplication by , as follows by comparing the two quotient exact sequences for and . The torsion subgroup of the finite -module is killed by one power of , so a compatible system in these last groups is zero. Thus every compatible system of sections comes uniquely from the limit of ; by [F3] this is . Applying the result to proves full faithfulness of completion for finite locally free sheaves.
By [F2] lift the cover on successively to compatible finite étale algebras on . Each is locally free. Flatness of gives as a sheaf on , by multiplication by . Choose so that is globally generated and using [F1]. Its finite generating list of global sections lifts compatibly to every because the obstruction group at every successive stage is that same zero group. Nakayama makes these lifts generate each . Thus there is a compatible system of surjections , with locally free kernels compatible under reduction: each sequence splits locally because is locally free. The same argument for , with another twist , gives a system of presentations By step 1.1 the compatible first maps algebraize to a map on . Let be its coherent cokernel; right exactness gives for all .
The sheaf is locally free near the closed fibre. At such a local ring , let be its finite module. If , the fact that is free over and that is a nonzerodivisor in implies for every . Krull intersection in [F3] gives , so acts injectively on . Lift a basis of to a map ; Nakayama makes it surjective. For its finite kernel , reduction modulo remains left exact because has no -torsion (apply the two-term resolution of ). Hence , and Nakayama gives . The chosen basis spreads to an open neighbourhood by finite presentations. The failure-of-local-freeness locus of a coherent module is closed, as seen from minors in finite presentations. If nonempty it would have a nonempty closed image in , hence meet the closed fibre by properness, contradicting what was just proved. Thus is locally free everywhere.
The products and units algebraize by step 1.1 because and its tensor powers are locally free. Associativity, commutativity and unit identities hold by the injectivity in that step, since they hold on every . The resulting algebra is finite locally free. Its differentials vanish on the closed fibre by [F2]–[F3] and then near that fibre by Nakayama; the support of this coherent differential module is closed and proper over , so it is empty by the same argument as step 3.1. Thus is finite étale by [F3], and its relative spectrum is the required lift. Maps between two lifted covers lift uniquely through all by [F2] and algebraize by step 1.1; multiplication identities are again detected by that injectivity. This proves the equivalence.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Projective Čech finiteness and Serre vanishing for the étale lifting construction
- Finite étale algebras lift uniquely through nilpotent thickenings
- Finite étale algebras have finite locally free underlying modules
- Completion of a finite module is extension of scalars
- The Krull intersection is the $(1-a)$-torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators
- Glue relative spectra of affine-local algebras
- Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation
- Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- EGA III, §5.2 (projective existence) and §5.3 (proper extension) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes §§8, 14, 18, 24; flat-DVR specialization of the proofs (standard reference, not scraped)