Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite étale covers of a projective flat family over a complete DVR lift uniquely

Statement

Assume AC. Let R be a complete Noetherian DVR with uniformizer t, and let Z be projective and flat over R. Write Zn=Z×RSpec⁡(R/tn) for n≥1. Restriction is an equivalence between finite étale covers of Z and of Z1. No smoothness or normality of Z is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, R, t, Z and a finite étale cover on Z1.

[F1]

Projective coherent Čech groups are finite, high twists have vanishing positive cohomology and are globally generated (Projective Čech finiteness and Serre vanishing for the étale lifting construction).

[F2]

Finite étale algebras are finite locally free and lift with their maps uniquely through nilpotent ideals (Finite étale algebras have finite locally free underlying modules, Finite étale algebras lift uniquely through nilpotent thickenings). Applying this on affine charts and using uniqueness glues the lifts on nilpotent scheme thickenings.

[F3]

Finite modules over complete R are complete, and finite modules at local rings are separated for an ideal in the maximal ideal. Nakayama lifts finite generating sets (Completion of a finite module is extension of scalars, The Krull intersection is the (1−a)-torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators). Relative spectra of affine-local algebras glue; flatness, finite presentation and vanishing differentials give étaleness, and differentials commute with base change (Glue relative spectra of affine-local algebras, Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change). AC is inherited through [F1]–[F3] (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1F3algebra

For any finite locally free sheaf E on Z, multiplication by tn is injective because Z is flat over R. Its exact quotient sequence gives 0⟶H0(Z,E)/tn⟶H0(Zn,E/tnE)⟶H1(Z,E)[tn]⟶0. Here the groups are the Čech groups in [F1], and the sequence follows from its exact-sequence calculation. The transition map on the last group is multiplication by t, as follows by comparing the two quotient exact sequences for tn+1 and tn. The torsion subgroup of the finite R-module H1(Z,E) is killed by one power of t, so a compatible system in these last groups is zero. Thus every compatible system of sections comes uniquely from the limit of H0(Z,E)/tn; by [F3] this is H0(Z,E). Applying the result to Hom(E,G) proves full faithfulness of completion for finite locally free sheaves.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1construct

By [F2] lift the cover on Z1 successively to compatible finite étale algebras Dn on Zn. Each is locally free. Flatness of Z/R gives ker⁡(Dn+1→Dn)≅D1 as a sheaf on Z1, by multiplication by tn. Choose d so that D1(d) is globally generated and H1(Z1,D1(d))=0 using [F1]. Its finite generating list of global sections lifts compatibly to every Dn(d) because the obstruction group at every successive stage is that same zero group. Nakayama makes these lifts generate each Dn(d). Thus there is a compatible system of surjections OZn(−d)r→Dn, with locally free kernels Kn compatible under reduction: each sequence splits locally because Dn is locally free. The same argument for K1, with another twist e, gives a system of presentations OZn(−e)s⟶OZn(−d)r⟶Dn⟶0. By step 1.1 the compatible first maps algebraize to a map on Z. Let D be its coherent cokernel; right exactness gives D/tnD≅Dn for all n.

3.1F3step 2.1algebra

The sheaf D is locally free near the closed fibre. At such a local ring B, let M be its finite module. If tm=0, the fact that M/tnM is free over B/tnB and that t is a nonzerodivisor in B implies m∈tn−1M for every n. Krull intersection in [F3] gives m=0, so t acts injectively on M. Lift a basis of M/tM to a map Br→M; Nakayama makes it surjective. For its finite kernel K, reduction modulo t remains left exact because M has no t-torsion (apply the two-term resolution of B/tB). Hence K/tK=0, and Nakayama gives K=0. The chosen basis spreads to an open neighbourhood by finite presentations. The failure-of-local-freeness locus of a coherent module is closed, as seen from minors in finite presentations. If nonempty it would have a nonempty closed image in Spec⁡R, hence meet the closed fibre by properness, contradicting what was just proved. Thus D is locally free everywhere.

4.1F2F3step 1.1step 3.1construct∎

The products Dn⊗Dn→Dn and units algebraize by step 1.1 because D and its tensor powers are locally free. Associativity, commutativity and unit identities hold by the injectivity in that step, since they hold on every Zn. The resulting algebra is finite locally free. Its differentials vanish on the closed fibre by [F2]–[F3] and then near that fibre by Nakayama; the support of this coherent differential module is closed and proper over R, so it is empty by the same argument as step 3.1. Thus D is finite étale by [F3], and its relative spectrum is the required lift. Maps between two lifted covers lift uniquely through all Zn by [F2] and algebraize by step 1.1; multiplication identities are again detected by that injectivity. This proves the equivalence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources