How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective modification of a proper integral DVR-scheme, unchanged in codimension one when regular
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a Noetherian DVR and let be an integral proper -scheme. There is an integral projective -scheme and a proper birational surjection , isomorphic over a dense open . If is regular, the maximal such open contains every codimension-one point of . If dominates , then is flat over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , , and the additional hypotheses for the corresponding clauses.
Projective spaces are proper, properness survives base change and composition and is local on the target, and a map from a proper source to a separated target is proper (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Properness survives arbitrary base change, Properness survives composition, Properness is local on the target, Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper). Proper maps satisfy valuative existence and uniqueness (Valuative criterion for properness).
A one-dimensional regular local ring is a DVR, and torsion-free modules over a PID are flat (one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs, Over a principal ideal domain flatness is equivalent to torsion-freeness). Projective-space charts are Relative projective space from standard charts. AC is inherited through these suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Choose a finite nonempty affine cover , and put . Since is integral, every contains its generic point and is nonempty dense. Each is finite type over , so finite algebra generators give a closed immersion into an affine space and hence an immersion . Let be its integral closure as a subscheme of that projective space, where “closure” means the reduced scheme-theoretic closure of its image, not normalization. Concretely its ideal on any affine chart is the kernel of evaluation in the function field of ; these prime ideals localize compatibly and define an integral closed subscheme. It contains as a dense open. Form the integral closure of the diagonal map in the same sense. The map of is an immersion, since its multi-diagonal into is closed by separatedness of ; therefore is a dense open of . Each projection factors through . Write , , and .
The maps agree on intersections, because they agree on the dense open , their source is integral, and the target is separated. They glue to . Each is proper by [F1]. The inclusion is proper over by the proper-source/separated-target assertion, hence closed; it is also dense since it contains , so it equals . Thus is proper by target locality. Its image contains the dense -subset and is closed in each , so it is surjective. The same argument applied to , whose map to is the identity, gives . The product of projective spaces has its Segre closed embedding in one projective space: in each chart the product coordinates recover the original affine coordinates, and globally the image is cut out by the two-by-two minors of the rank-one coordinate tensor; iteration gives the finite-product embedding. Hence , open in closed , has an immersion in projective space. Since is proper over and the ambient projective space is separated, that immersion is proper by [F1] and hence closed. Thus is projective and integral, and is birational.
If is regular and has codimension one, put , a DVR by [F2], with fraction field . The base change is integral and proper birational over . Any affine chart meeting its closed fibre has a finite-type coordinate algebra containing . An element of negative valuation in would make the uniformizer invertible in , so cannot occur on such a chart; consequently . A chart meeting the closed fibre exists by valuative existence in [F1], and any two such charts give sections agreeing at the generic point and hence equal by separatedness. It follows that is an isomorphism. This isomorphism spreads to a neighbourhood of : use finitely many affine charts for the finite-type morphism, express the inverse ring maps by finitely many generators, relations and denominators outside the prime of , and shrink to make their compositions equal to the identity. Charts absent after localization are removed by clearing their relation ; the remaining finitely many charts glue the inverse. Thus the open isomorphism locus contains every codimension-one point.
If dominates the trait, the same is true of integral . Its affine coordinate rings are torsion-free over , hence flat by [F2]. Flatness is affine local, so is flat. This proves all clauses, retaining AC through [F1]–[F2].
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base
- Properness survives arbitrary base change
- Properness survives composition
- Properness is local on the target
- Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper
- Valuative criterion for properness
- one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs
- Over a principal ideal domain flatness is equivalent to torsion-freeness
- Relative projective space from standard charts
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- EGA III, §5.2 (projective existence) and §5.3 (proper extension) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes §§8, 14, 18, 24; flat-DVR specialization of the proofs (standard reference, not scraped)