Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective modification of a proper integral DVR-scheme, unchanged in codimension one when regular

Statement

Assume AC. Let R be a Noetherian DVR and let X be an integral proper R-scheme. There is an integral projective R-scheme Z and a proper birational surjection π:Z→X, isomorphic over a dense open U. If X is regular, the maximal such open U contains every codimension-one point of X. If X dominates Spec⁡R, then Z is flat over R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, R, X, and the additional hypotheses for the corresponding clauses.

[F1]

Projective spaces are proper, properness survives base change and composition and is local on the target, and a map from a proper source to a separated target is proper (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Properness survives arbitrary base change, Properness survives composition, Properness is local on the target, Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper). Proper maps satisfy valuative existence and uniqueness (Valuative criterion for properness).

[F2]

A one-dimensional regular local ring is a DVR, and torsion-free modules over a PID are flat (one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs, Over a principal ideal domain flatness is equivalent to torsion-freeness). Projective-space charts are Relative projective space from standard charts. AC is inherited through these suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1F2construct

Choose a finite nonempty affine cover X=⋃iUi, and put U=⋂iUi. Since X is integral, every Ui contains its generic point and U is nonempty dense. Each Ui is finite type over R, so finite algebra generators give a closed immersion into an affine space and hence an immersion Ui→PRni. Let Zi be its integral closure as a subscheme of that projective space, where “closure” means the reduced scheme-theoretic closure of its image, not normalization. Concretely its ideal on any affine chart is the kernel of evaluation in the function field of Ui; these prime ideals localize compatibly and define an integral closed subscheme. It contains Ui as a dense open. Form the integral closure W of the diagonal map U→∏iPRni in the same sense. The map of U is an immersion, since its multi-diagonal into ∏iUi is closed by separatedness of X/R; therefore U is a dense open of W. Each projection factors through Zi. Write pi:W→Zi, Vi=pi−1(Ui), and Z=⋃iVi.

2.1F1step 1.1construct

The maps Vi→Ui→X agree on intersections, because they agree on the dense open U, their source is integral, and the target is separated. They glue to π:Z→X. Each Vi→Ui is proper by [F1]. The inclusion Vi⊆π−1(Ui) is proper over Ui by the proper-source/separated-target assertion, hence closed; it is also dense since it contains U, so it equals π−1(Ui). Thus π is proper by target locality. Its image contains the dense Ui-subset U and is closed in each Ui, so it is surjective. The same argument applied to U⊆π−1(U), whose map to U is the identity, gives π−1(U)=U. The product of projective spaces has its Segre closed embedding in one projective space: in each chart the product coordinates recover the original affine coordinates, and globally the image is cut out by the two-by-two minors of the rank-one coordinate tensor; iteration gives the finite-product embedding. Hence Z, open in closed W, has an immersion in projective space. Since Z is proper over R and the ambient projective space is separated, that immersion is proper by [F1] and hence closed. Thus Z is projective and integral, and π is birational.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra

If X is regular and x has codimension one, put A=OX,x, a DVR by [F2], with fraction field K(X). The base change ZA is integral and proper birational over A. Any affine chart meeting its closed fibre has a finite-type coordinate algebra B⊆K(X) containing A. An element of negative valuation in B would make the uniformizer invertible in B, so cannot occur on such a chart; consequently B=A. A chart meeting the closed fibre exists by valuative existence in [F1], and any two such charts give sections agreeing at the generic point and hence equal by separatedness. It follows that ZA→Spec⁡A is an isomorphism. This isomorphism spreads to a neighbourhood of x: use finitely many affine charts for the finite-type morphism, express the inverse ring maps by finitely many generators, relations and denominators outside the prime of x, and shrink to make their compositions equal to the identity. Charts absent after localization are removed by clearing their relation 1=0; the remaining finitely many charts glue the inverse. Thus the open isomorphism locus contains every codimension-one point.

4.1F1F2step 2.1step 3.1∎

If X dominates the trait, the same is true of integral Z. Its affine coordinate rings are torsion-free over R, hence flat by [F2]. Flatness is affine local, so Z/R is flat. This proves all clauses, retaining AC through [F1]–[F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources