Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The precise shifted L-infinity structure of a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra

Statement

Let g be a cohomologically graded Lie algebra over a characteristic-zero field: its degree-zero bracket is graded skew, satisfies graded Jacobi, and a degree-one map d satisfies d2=0 and d[x,y]=[dx,y]+(−1)∣x∣[x,dy]. Suppose its degreewise separated complete positive filtration is preserved by d and satisfies [Frg,Fsg]⊆Fr+sg. With s:g→g[1] of degree −1, set

q1(sx)=−s(dx),q2(sx,sy)=(−1)∣x∣s[x,y],qn=0 (n≥3).

These operations define a complete filtered shifted L∞-algebra. Its degree-zero Maurer–Cartan elements are exactly sR, where R∈F1g1 satisfies dR+[R,R]/2=0. Its elementary gauge paths are exactly R′=−dξ+[ξ,R] with ξ∈F1g0[t]∧, under w=sR, a=sξ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The differential graded Lie identities and filtration hypotheses in the statement.

[F1]

Square-zero coderivations are equivalent to the shifted higher Jacobi identities gives the shifted unshuffle identities equivalent to a square-zero coderivation.

[F2]

Complete filtered L∞-algebra specifies the complete additive filtration conditions.

[F3]

Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements specifies curvature and polynomial gauge paths in the shifted convention.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

The degree of each displayed operation is one. If a=∣x∣, b=∣y∣, skewsymmetry gives q2(sy,sx)=(−1)b+1+abs[x,y], so q2(sx,sy)=(−1)(a−1)(b−1)q2(sy,sx). Hence q2 descends to S2(g[1]). The unary shifted identity is q12(sx)=s(d2x)=0.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

On (sx,sy) the three arity-two terms are q1q2(sx,sy)=(−1)a+1s[dx,y]−s[x,dy], q2(q1sx,sy)=(−1)as[dx,y], and (−1)a−1q2(sx,q1sy)=s[x,dy]. They sum to zero by the differential derivation identity.

2.2givenF1step 1.1algebra

Put c=∣z∣. The three arity-three unshuffle terms, with their Koszul signs, sum to (−1)bs([[x,y],z]−(−1)bc[[x,z],y]+(−1)a(b+c)[[y,z],x]). Skewsymmetry rewrites the parenthesis as [[x,y],z]+(−1)ab[y,[x,z]]−[x,[y,z]], which is zero by graded Jacobi. In arities at least four every composition contains an operation of arity at least three and vanishes. Thus [F1] gives square zero.

3.1givenF2F3step 2.2algebra

The shifted filtration is complete and separated in each degree because the original one is; q1 preserves it and q2 adds filtration indices. All higher operations vanish. These are exactly [F2]. For R∈F1g1, the curvature is C(sR)=−s(dR+[R,R]/2) by substituting ∣R∣=1. Thus the asserted Maurer–Cartan equation is equivalent to C(sR)=0.

4.1givenF3step 3.1algebra∎

For ξ∈F1g0, q1sR(sξ)=−s(dξ)−s[R,ξ]=s(−dξ+[ξ,R]) by skewsymmetry. Applying this quotientwise to polynomial coefficients translates [F3] exactly to R′=−dξ+[ξ,R]. The degree of sξ is −1, as required for the path parameter.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources