How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Existence and uniqueness of complete filtered Maurer–Cartan gauge flow
Statement
In the setting of Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements, for every and every there is a unique with and . It satisfies , so it is an elementary gauge path. Modulo every the construction stabilizes after finitely many polynomial Picard iterations; no globally bounded polynomial degree is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The filtered shifted L∞-algebra, , and of the statement.
Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements supplies complete polynomial coefficients, integration, and .
Filtered Taylor maps extend to the completed coaugmented symmetric coalgebra supplies the total-weight completed coaugmented symmetric coalgebra, the continuous unshuffle coderivation , and the convergent group-like exponential .
Proof
Apply [F2] to the identity Taylor morphism of . In its completed coalgebra, multiplication is a continuous coalgebra automorphism with inverse , because . Consequently is a coderivation and . It may have a constant term, since does not preserve coaugmentation. Expanding the unshuffle formula and choosing the inputs in the distinguished -block gives and for : the indistinguishable degree-zero inputs give exactly . Every expression is finite modulo a fixed total weight, and hence converges.
If and , then . The unary terms cancel; each term in the multilinear telescoping expansion of every remaining difference contains and , giving filtration at least . The other inputs have positive filtration. This calculation is finite modulo each .
In particular and . Applying to and projecting to length one gives : the length-two term contributes and the length-one term contributes ; other lengths do not survive projection. Applying the same operation to gives . These identities also hold over completed polynomial coefficients, quotient by quotient.
Set and . The first difference lies in ; step 1.2 and induction give . Thus the sequence stabilizes in each quotient, where all iterates are genuine polynomials. Completeness defines . Reduction, integration and differentiation commute, so and .
If two solutions have the same initial value, their difference obeys the difference of the integral equations. It first lies in , and step 1.2 forces it successively into every . Separation gives equality.
Termwise differentiation in each finite quotient gives . Hence satisfies by step 2.1, and . Its integral equation is . Initially ; if , the right side lies in because . Induction and separation give , completing both existence on the Maurer–Cartan locus and uniqueness.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dolgushev and Rogers, A Version of the Goldman–Millson Theorem for Filtered L-infinity-Algebras, section 2 and Appendix A (standard reference, not scraped)
- Manetti, Deformation theory via differential graded Lie algebras, section 5 (standard reference, not scraped)