Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A∞, L∞, and Deformation Complexes

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page fixes one cohomological, unsuspended convention for uncurved A∞-algebras and one shifted-coalgebra convention for L∞-algebras. It proves the low-arity Stasheff relations, the DGA special case, the symmetric-coalgebra coderivation identities, and complete filtered Maurer–Cartan convergence, Taylor functoriality, gauge paths, and the fixed-carrier codifferential deformation correspondence. The companion supplies checked finite examples and boundary cases.

A∞ convention

An A∞-algebra here has operations mn of degree 2−n and the signed Stasheff sum given on the page's definition item. Its arity-two operation is not assumed associative; the arity-three identity states exactly how m3 measures its associator. A differential graded algebra is the case m1=d, m2=μ, and mn=0 for n≥3. No strict-unit condition is built into the definition.

The A∞ morphism formula is stated separately in the same convention. The finite Massey example constructs its own morphism and verifies every arity; no general homotopy-transfer theorem is used as a supplier.

Shifted L∞ convention

For a cohomologically graded V, set W=V[1] by Wj=Vj+1. The operations qn:Sn(W)→W have degree +1 and are encoded by the unique coderivation Q on the reduced cofree conilpotent cocommutative coalgebra Sc(W); the structure equation is Q2=0. The local proof derives all higher Jacobi identities from this equation in the same Koszul convention. No unsuspended ln sign translation is asserted.

Maurer–Cartan boundary

All graded filtration completions are taken degreewise. Maurer–Cartan inputs have degree zero and their curvature series have degree one; gauge paths and endomorphism series likewise converge within their specified homogeneous degree. No completeness of an ungraded direct sum across unbounded degrees is asserted.

For w∈F1W0 in a complete separated filtration satisfying qn(Fr1,…,Frn)⊆Fr1+⋯+rn, each term of ∑n≥1qn(wn)/n! lies in FnW1. Every quotient W/FrW therefore sees only finitely many terms, and completeness gives a unique limit. This is an algebraic convergence statement; no analytic convergence is involved.

A filtered L∞ morphism is a filtration-preserving Taylor family whose coalgebra extension commutes with the shifted coderivations. The local ordered-partition formulas prove its pushforward on Maurer–Cartan elements, composition, and compatibility with completed polynomial gauge paths. Paths are polynomial in every nilpotent quotient; no common polynomial-degree bound or analytic integration is assumed. The Picard proof supplies every gauge flow and proves that curvature remains zero.

Specified deformation problem

The deformation objects are square-zero codifferentials on a fixed coaugmented tensor or symmetric coalgebra, completed in a separated complete coefficient ideal and reducing to a specified codifferential. Their equivalences are independently defined continuous coalgebra automorphisms congruent to the identity modulo that ideal, acting by conjugation. Continuous coefficient-raising coderivations form the controlling complete differential graded Lie algebra. Local noncommutative exponential/logarithm and time-ordered flow proofs identify its Maurer–Cartan gauge classes with exactly these deformation classes, for both fixed-carrier A∞ and L∞ structures.

For an ordinary unital associative algebra, the normalized tensor-coderivation specialization gives all formal products with the fixed unit and all unit-preserving changes of variables. This is a concrete correspondence, including its equivalences; its completion hypotheses are explicit in the helper statements. The general boundary is explained in The general Maurer–Cartan deformation correspondence needs a proved gauge construction.

Reading route

Read dg-and-homological-algebra-foundations first for the cohomological DGA interface. Its page prerequisite is a reading route; the DGA example and Massey argument name the exact item-level supplier they use. Existing Hochschild results provide homology context. The strict associative specialization constructs and proves its own normalized coderivation complex; no formality theorem is asserted.

Companion: a-infinity-l-infinity-and-deformation-complexes-examples.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations

Definition

Let k be a field (Field), and let V1,…,Vn be graded k-vector spaces. A k-vector space is a unital left k-module as in Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module. Tensor powers are formed using the tensor products of Tensor algebra of a vector space. If fi:Vi→Wi are homogeneous linear maps of degrees di, and xi∈Vi are homogeneous of degrees pi, the graded tensor map is defined on pure tensors by

(f1⊗⋯⊗fn)(x1⊗⋯⊗xn)=(−1)∑i>jdipjf1(x1)⊗⋯⊗fn(xn).

It is extended linearly. In particular, for two maps, (f⊗g)(x⊗y)=(−1)∣g∣∣x∣f(x)⊗g(y).

For homogeneous x1,…,xn and a permutation σ∈Sn, the Koszul sign of reordering them to xσ(1)⊗⋯⊗xσ(n) is

ϵ(σ;x1,…,xn)=(−1)∑i<jσ(i)>σ(j)∣xσ(i)∣∣xσ(j)∣.

Thus swapping two adjacent homogeneous factors x,y contributes (−1)∣x∣∣y∣. Every tensor of maps, permutation, unshuffle, and symmetric power below uses this same convention. A sign is a scalar in k determined only by the parity of the displayed integer exponent.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Triple Massey data in a cohomological differential graded algebra

Definition

Let (A,d,μ) be a cohomological differential graded algebra over a commutative ring, with the degree-one differential and signed Leibniz rule of Cohomological differential graded algebra. For j∈Z, define

Hj(A)=ker⁡(d:Aj→Aj+1)/im⁡(d:Aj−1→Aj).

A triple Massey datum consists of homogeneous closed elements a∈Ap, b∈Aq, and c∈Ar such that ab and bc are boundaries, together with elements

u∈Ap+q−1,v∈Aq+r−1,du=ab,dv=bc.

The associated triple Massey expression is

ω(a,b,c;u,v)=(−1)p+1av+uc∈Ap+q+r−1.

This item defines the data and expression only. The next lemma proves that the expression is closed, so its cohomology class is defined.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention

Definition

Let k be a field (Field) and let A=⨁j∈ZAj be a Z-graded k-vector space; its tensor maps use the convention in Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations. An uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention is a sequence of homogeneous k-linear maps

mn:A⊗kn⟶A,∣mn∣=2−n,n≥1,

such that for every n≥1 the following equality of maps A⊗kn→A holds:

∑r,t≥0, s≥1r+s+t=n(−1)r+stmr+1+t(1⊗r⊗ms⊗1⊗t)=0.

Here 1 denotes the identity map of A, the tensor maps use the Koszul rule, and the displayed sign (−1)r+st is part of the fixed convention. The degree condition means that for homogeneous inputs of degrees j1,…,jn, mn has output degree j1+⋯+jn+2−n.

“Uncurved” means no arity-zero operation m0 is included. “Nonunital” means that no unit is part of this definition. A unit or a strict-unit condition on higher operations is additional data and must be stated separately. No graded commutativity is assumed for m2.

Remarks

The arity-two identity is the chain-map condition for m2. Its commutative square is shown below; the downward map on A⊗2 is the tensor differential with the Koszul sign rule. This diagram records the equation only; it is not a proof of any Stasheff identity.

A¬2AA¬2Am2m1¬1+1¬m1m1m2
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The triple Massey expression is a cocycle

Statement

For every triple Massey datum in Triple Massey data in a cohomological differential graded algebra, the expression ω=(−1)p+1av+uc is closed. Thus it determines a class in Hp+q+r−1(A).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A cohomological differential graded algebra A and homogeneous closed a,b,c of degrees p,q,r, with du=ab and dv=bc.

[F1]

Triple Massey data in a cohomological differential graded algebra: the expression is ω=(−1)p+1av+uc, with ∣u∣=p+q−1 and ∣v∣=q+r−1.

[F2]

Cohomological differential graded algebra: for homogeneous x,y, d(xy)=d(x)y+(−1)∣x∣xd(y), and multiplication is associative.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

By [F2], closedness of a,c and the defining equations in [F1], dω=(−1)p+1(−1)pa dv+(du)c=−a(bc)+(ab)c.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

Associativity gives a(bc)=(ab)c, so the right side of step 1.1 is zero. Therefore ω is a cycle of degree p+q+r−1 and has a class in the displayed cohomology group.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Reduced graded symmetric coalgebra with its shuffle coproduct

Definition

Let k be a characteristic-zero field (Field), meaning char⁡(k)=0 under The characteristic of a ring: the least n≥1 with n⋅1R=0 when one exists, and 0 otherwise. By Every field is a commutative ring with 1≠0; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring, k is a commutative ring. Let W=⨁j∈ZWj be a graded k-vector space. For n≥1, define the graded symmetric power

Sn(W)=W⊗kn/Jn,

where Jn is spanned by the differences obtained by replacing any adjacent homogeneous factors x⊗y by (−1)∣x∣∣y∣y⊗x inside a pure tensor. Write w1⊙⋯⊙wn for the image of a tensor and set

Sc(W)=⨁n≥1Sn(W).

The reduced shuffle coproduct is the degree-zero linear map Δˉ:Sc(W)→Sc(W)⊗kSc(W) given on a homogeneous pure symmetric tensor by

Δˉ(w1⊙⋯⊙wn)=∑p=1n−1 ∑σ∈Sh⁡(p,n−p)ϵ(σ;w1,…,wn)(wσ(1)⊙⋯⊙wσ(p))⊗(wσ(p+1)⊙⋯⊙wσ(n)),

where Sh⁡(p,n−p)={σ∈Sn:σ(1)<⋯<σ(p), σ(p+1)<⋯<σ(n)}, and ϵ is the Koszul sign of Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations. For n=1 the sum is empty and Δˉ(w)=0. This is a reduced, hence noncounital coalgebra convention; no arity-zero summand is included. The next lemmas verify its coproduct laws, conilpotence, and cofree universal property.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation

Definition

Let k be a characteristic-zero field, let B be a commutative unital k-algebra concentrated in degree zero, and let I be an ideal such that B≅lim←⁡n≥1B/In. Nilpotent ideals are included. Let V be any graded k-vector space; no finite-dimensionality assumption is made. Use the graded tensor convention of Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations.

The carrier C is either the coaugmented tensor coalgebra Tc(V)=⨁r≥0V⊗r with deconcatenation, or the coaugmented graded symmetric coalgebra Sc(V)=⨁r≥0Sr(V) with unshuffle coproduct. For the latter, Sr means graded symmetric coinvariants, and the coproduct sums over all divisions of the inputs into two ordered sublists, with the Koszul sign. The empty word is 1C, the counit ϵ is projection to length zero, and the coaugmentation is inclusion of scalars. These formulas specify the carrier without requiring a cofree universal property.

Define its coefficient completion, filtration, and tensor target by

CB=lim←⁡n(C⊗kB/In),FnCB=ker⁡(CB⟶C⊗kB/In),F0CB=CB.

CB⊗^BCB=lim←⁡n((C⊗kC)⊗kB/In).

All inverse limits in this definition are in graded modules: explicitly (CB)j=lim←⁡n(Cj⊗kB/In) and CB=⨁j(CB)j, and the tensor target is completed in each fixed total degree. All structure maps are extended degreewise through these inverse limits. This is coefficient completion of a direct sum: modulo each In every element has finite length support. No unrestricted product over arities is included. Completed tensor powers and polynomial coefficients mean the analogous explicit inverse limits. A homogeneous map is understood in the grading induced by C, and continuity always means the displayed coefficient topology.

Let Ed consist of continuous B-linear filtration-preserving homogeneous endomorphisms of degree d on CB, and set E=⨁dEd, with composition EdEe⊆Ed+e. Completeness of this graded composition algebra always means completeness of each Ed separately, not of its ungraded direct sum. All exponential and logarithm series below have inputs in E0 and remain in E0; their conjugation series on a homogeneous T∈Ed remain in that same fixed Ed. Its order filtration is

FpE={T:T(FqCB)⊆Fp+qCB for every q≥0}(p≥0).

Let l⊂E be the homogeneous coderivations satisfying T(1C)=0, ϵT=0, and

ΔT=(T⊗1+1⊗T)Δ.

The sign in 1⊗T is the graded tensor sign. In particular these coderivations have zero nullary component. Fix D∈l1 with D2=0. A coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation is D+R with R∈F1l1 and (D+R)2=0. Its allowed equivalences are degree-zero continuous B-linear counital coaugmented coalgebra automorphisms G such that G−id⁡∈F1E, acting by D+R↦G(D+R)G−1.

Here identity modulo I can equivalently be stated as (G−id⁡)(CB)⊆F1CB. To see the filtration implication without assuming that I is finitely generated, observe that FqCB is the closure of C⊗Iq: modulo Fn, n>q, every element lifts from C⊗Iq. By B-linearity a continuous map with image in F1 carries that dense submodule into Fq+1; closedness gives the same inclusion on all Fq.

This contract uses all continuous coefficient-complete Taylor operations. It does not identify them with a naive algebraic tensor Hom⁡k(W,U)⊗I when the coefficient algebra is infinite dimensional. Over a finite-dimensional coefficient algebra, expanding in a finite coefficient basis does give the usual tensor identification, without any finite-dimensionality assumption on W,U.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The first three Stasheff identities

Statement

Let (A,mn) be an uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra with the unsuspended convention of Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention. Its first three identities are

m1m1=0,

m1m2=m2(m1⊗1+1⊗m1),

and

m1m3+m3(m1⊗1⊗1+1⊗m1⊗1+1⊗1⊗m1)+m2(m2⊗1)−m2(1⊗m2)=0.

In particular, m1 is a cochain differential and a signed derivation of m2. The third identity explicitly gives the associator m2(m2⊗1)−m2(1⊗m2) as the negative of the displayed m1,m3 terms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra (A,mn) over a field, with the Koszul tensor convention specified in its definition.

[F1]

Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention: for each n≥1, ∑r+s+t=n, s≥1(−1)r+stmr+1+t(1⊗r⊗ms⊗1⊗t)=0.

[F2]

Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations: for homogeneous maps and inputs, (f⊗g)(x⊗y)=(−1)∣g∣∣x∣f(x)⊗g(y).

Proof

1.1givenF1

For n=1, the only triple (r,s,t) is (0,1,0), so [F1] is exactly m1m1=0.

1.2F1F2algebra

For n=2, the triples are (0,1,1), (1,1,0), and (0,2,0); their coefficients are −1,−1,+1. Hence [F1] gives m1m2−m2(m1⊗1)−m2(1⊗m1)=0. On homogeneous a,b, [F2] makes the last term (−1)∣a∣m2(a,m1b), which is the signed derivation rule.

2.1F1algebra∎

For n=3, the triples with s=1 contribute the three terms m3(m1⊗1⊗1), m3(1⊗m1⊗1), m3(1⊗1⊗m1), each with sign +1; s=2 contributes m2(m2⊗1)−m2(1⊗m2); and s=3 contributes m1m3. Their sum is the third displayed identity.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A∞-morphism and quasi-isomorphism

Definition

Let A and B be uncurved cohomological A∞-algebras in the convention of Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention. An A∞-morphism f:A→B is a family of homogeneous maps

fn:A⊗kn⟶B,∣fn∣=1−n,n≥1,

such that, for every n≥1, the following equality of maps A⊗kn→B holds:

∑r,s,t≥0, s≥1r+s+t=n(−1)r+stfr+1+t(1⊗r⊗msA⊗1⊗t)=∑q=1n ∑i1+⋯+iq=nij≥1(−1)η(i1,…,iq)mqB(fi1⊗⋯⊗fiq),

where η(i1,…,iq)=∑j=1q−1(q−j)(ij−1) and all tensor maps use Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations. The identity at n=1 says that f1 is a cochain map from (A,m1A) to (B,m1B).

An A∞-morphism is an A∞ quasi-isomorphism if f1 induces an isomorphism on cohomology, where Hj(A,m1A)=ker⁡(m1A:Aj→Aj+1)/im⁡(m1A:Aj−1→Aj) and likewise for B. This definition imposes no unit condition on f.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Triple Massey product with a fixed cohomological sign convention

Definition

Let A and its cohomology groups be as in Triple Massey data in a cohomological differential graded algebra, and let α∈Hp(A), β∈Hq(A) and γ∈Hr(A) be cohomology classes. Their triple Massey product in that item's sign convention is the subset

⟨α,β,γ⟩={[ω(a,b,c;u,v)]∈Hp+q+r−1(A):(a,b,c;u,v) is a triple Massey datum representing (α,β,γ)}.

The expression is a cohomology class because it is closed by The triple Massey expression is a cocycle. The set includes every choice of cocycle representatives and null-homotopies for which the adjacent products are boundaries; if there is no such datum, it is empty. No claim that the set is a singleton is part of the definition.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The graded shuffle coproduct is coassociative, cocommutative, and conilpotent

Statement

Let Sc(W) and Δˉ be as in Reduced graded symmetric coalgebra with its shuffle coproduct. The reduced coproduct is well-defined on the graded-symmetric quotient, is coassociative and graded-cocommutative, and is conilpotent: every element is killed by a sufficiently long iterated reduced coproduct. Its primitive subspace (ker⁡Δˉ) is exactly S1(W)=W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A graded vector space W over a characteristic-zero field and the shuffle coproduct formula.

[F1]

Reduced graded symmetric coalgebra with its shuffle coproduct: the coproduct sums over (p,n−p)-unshuffles with the displayed Koszul signs.

[F2]

Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations: a graded permutation has the sign obtained by multiplying (−1)∣x∣∣y∣ over its transpositions.

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

The quotient relations are generated by adjacent graded swaps. In each unshuffle summand of [F1], swapping adjacent inputs either changes their order inside one output block, where the same quotient relation applies, or moves them between blocks, where the graded flip in the target tensor product contributes exactly (−1)∣x∣∣y∣. The unshuffle terms are reindexed by this swap, so [F1] and [F2] give the same output class; hence Δˉ descends to Sn(W).

1.2F1F2algebra

Both iterated coproducts (Δˉ⊗1)Δˉ and (1⊗Δˉ)Δˉ on a length-n tensor sum over the same ordered decompositions of its labels into three nonempty, internally ordered blocks. In either parenthesization the sign is the Koszul sign of the single permutation that places those labels into the same three blocks. The terms therefore agree one by one, proving coassociativity.

1.3F1F2algebra

The graded flip interchanging the two tensor factors sends a (p,n−p)-unshuffle to the complementary (n−p,p)-unshuffle. Its block-swap sign is exactly the Koszul sign for moving every factor in the first block past every factor in the second. Thus the terms pair with identical coefficients after the graded flip, proving graded cocommutativity.

1.4F1algebra

Each application of Δˉ splits a length-n tensor into two positive lengths. An iterated coproduct into r factors is consequently a sum over ordered decompositions into r nonempty blocks; if r>n there are no such decompositions. Every element of Sc(W) is a finite sum of lengths, so a sufficiently long iterated reduced coproduct kills it.

1.5F1F2algebra

The length-one component of Δˉ on Sn(W) is Sn(W)→W⊗Sn−1(W). Compose it with concatenation W⊗Sn−1(W)→Sn(W). For a pure tensor, each of the n choices of the singleton factor returns the same graded-symmetric class: the Koszul sign used to move that factor to the front is canceled by the same sign in concatenating it back. The composite is therefore n idSn(W).

2.1F1F3step 1.5∎

If x∈Sn(W) with n≥2 is primitive, its reduced coproduct is zero, so the composite in step 1.5 gives nx=0. By [F3], multiplication by n is invertible, hence x=0. Lengths are a direct sum and every element has finite length support; the only primitives are therefore the length-one elements W. Conversely, [F1] gives Δˉ(w)=0 for each w∈W.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra

Statement

Use Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation. For every fixed degree d, the order filtration on Ed is separated and complete, with Ed≅lim←⁡nEd/(FnE)d; thus E is complete as a graded algebra in the degreewise sense, with FpE FqE⊆Fp+qE. The coderivations form a closed graded Lie subalgebra for

[P,Q]=PQ−(−1)∣P∣∣Q∣QP.

With dT=[D,T], the positive-order space g=F1l is a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra in this degreewise sense, with Fpg=Fpl for p≥1, d(Fpg)⊆Fpg, and [Fpg,Fqg]⊆Fp+qg.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The coefficient-complete carrier, endomorphism filtration, coderivations, and square-zero degree-one D in the stated definition.

[F1]

Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation specifies the completed carrier, order filtration, closed coderivation equations, and square-zero degree-one operator D.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstruct

Fix a degree d. For a uniformly Cauchy sequence Tm in Ed, each Tm(c) is Cauchy in CB, because Tm−Tj∈FpE eventually for every p. For homogeneous c of degree j, define T(c)=lim⁡mTm(c) in (CB)j+d; extend over the finite homogeneous decomposition of each c. Limits in the fixed output degree preserve addition, B-linearity, and each closed FqCB. In particular T has degree d. Thus T preserves the filtration and is continuous. If Tm−Tj∈FpE for all sufficiently large j, passing to the limit on every FqCB gives Tm−T∈FpE. More directly, a compatible family of cosets in Ed/(FpE)d determines compatible evaluation cosets on each c in every CB/FnCB, without choosing simultaneous representatives. Their unique limit defines T; evaluating on FqCB modulo Fp+q proves that its class is the prescribed one in Ed/(FpE)d. This proves degreewise inverse-limit completeness as well; if T∈⋂pFpE, every T(c) belongs to ⋂pFpCB=0, proving separation.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

If P∈FpE and Q∈FqE, then PQ(FrCB)⊆P(Fq+rCB)⊆Fp+q+rCB, proving multiplicativity. The coderivation equation, the counit equation, and evaluation at 1C are closed conditions: reduce each equation modulo Fn in its explicitly completed target, where sufficiently close maps agree. Consequently l and every Fpl are closed and complete in each fixed degree for their induced filtration.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

Put p=∣P∣, q=∣Q∣. For coderivations, the graded tensor composition rule gives ΔPQ=(PQ⊗1+P⊗Q+(−1)pqQ⊗P+1⊗PQ)Δ. Subtracting (−1)pqΔQP cancels the two mixed terms and gives Δ[P,Q]=([P,Q]⊗1+1⊗[P,Q])Δ. Also [P,Q](1C)=0 and ϵ[P,Q]=0. Thus coderivations are closed under the commutator, and multiplicativity proves the additive filtration bound.

4.1step 3.1algebra

The commutator is graded skew because [P,Q]=−(−1)pq[Q,P]. For ∣R∣=r, direct expansion of [P,[Q,R]] is PQR−(−1)qrPRQ−(−1)p(q+r)QRP+(−1)p(q+r)+qrRQP. The expansion of [[P,Q],R] is PQR−(−1)pqQPR−(−1)(p+q)rRPQ+(−1)(p+q)r+pqRQP. The expansion of (−1)pq[Q,[P,R]] is (−1)pqQPR−(−1)pq+prQRP−(−1)qrPRQ+(−1)qr+prRPQ. The QPR and RPQ terms cancel in the last two expressions; the other four agree with the first expression. This proves the graded Jacobi identity in derivation form, with all signs explicit.

5.1F1givenstep 4.1algebra

For homogeneous T of degree t, expanding [D,[D,T]] gives D2T−TD2, since the two DTD terms have coefficients −(−1)t and +(−1)t. Hence d2T=0. Substituting P=D into the Jacobi identity proved in step 4.1 gives d[P,Q]=[dP,Q]+(−1)∣P∣[P,dQ]. Because D preserves each coefficient filtration, composition with D and hence d preserve every FpE and every Fpl.

6.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

The preceding steps prove all graded Lie, differential, degreewise completeness, and filtration axioms on F1l. In each quotient by Fn, any bracket with at least n positive-order entries vanishes by the additive bound. Thus the positive filtration is pronilpotent as well as complete, as claimed.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra

Statement

Let E be any unital associative k-algebra over a characteristic-zero field, with descending two-sided filtration F0E=E, FpE FqE⊆Fp+qE, and E≅lim←⁡E/FnE. Commutativity is not assumed. The formulas

exp⁡X=∑j≥0Xjj!,log⁡(1+N)=∑j≥1(−1)j−1Njj

give mutually inverse bijections F1E↔1+F1E, and exp⁡(−X) is the inverse of exp⁡X. For X∈F1E and T∈E,

exp⁡(X)Texp⁡(−X)=∑r≥0(ad⁡X)r(T)r!,ad⁡X(T)=XT−TX.

There is also a degreewise-complete graded variant: assume E=⨁dEd is a multiplicatively filtered graded algebra with each Ed≅lim←⁡nEd/(FnE)d. Then exp and log give inverse bijections (F1E)0↔1+(F1E)0, and the displayed conjugation identity holds for X∈(F1E)0 and any fixed homogeneous T∈Ed. The first two series converge in E0 and the conjugation series in Ed; no completeness of the ungraded direct sum is required. In particular this variant applies to the degreewise complete endomorphism algebra in Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation once its completeness is established.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complete multiplicatively filtered unital associative algebra E, X,N∈F1E, and T∈E.

[F1]

Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation specifies the concrete endomorphism algebra and its order filtration for the stated application; the abstract lemma separately assumes completeness.

Proof

1.1givenconstruct

The terms Xj and Nj belong to FjE. Therefore all displayed series have finite reductions modulo every FnE and define unique limits. Multiplication respects these limits because the filtration is multiplicative. In particular any one-variable formal series with rational coefficients and zero-order constant defined in k can be evaluated at a positive-order element: each coefficient calculation becomes finite in every quotient.

1.2algebra

In Q[ ⁣[t] ⁣], define ℓ(t)=∑j≥1(−1)j−1tj/j. Termwise differentiation gives ℓ′(t)=(1+t)−1. The formal chain rule, obtained by expanding products coefficient by coefficient, gives h′=h/(1+t) for h=exp⁡ℓ(t) and h(0)=1. From (1+t)h′=h the coefficient recursion gives h=1+t: its coefficient of t is 1 and every higher coefficient is zero. Also the formal derivative of ℓ(exp⁡(t)−1) is 1 and its constant coefficient is zero, so ℓ(exp⁡(t)−1)=t. Each assertion is an identity of scalar coefficient series.

1.3givenalgebra

Induction on r proves (ad⁡X)r(T)=∑j=0r(−1)j(rj)Xr−jTXj: the induction step multiplies once on the left and subtracts once on the right, and Pascal's identity collects the overlapping terms. Every summand has filtration order at least r, even if T has order zero, so the resulting exponential series converges.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Substitute N and X into the two scalar identities modulo FnE and pass to the inverse limit, using step 1.1. This proves exp⁡(log⁡(1+N))=1+N and log⁡(exp⁡X)=X. The substitution is sound in the noncommutative algebra because every identity involves powers of one fixed element only. The coefficient of total degree r>0 in exp⁡(X)exp⁡(−X) is Xr∑j=0r(−1)j/(j!(r−j)!)=0; the degree-zero coefficient is 1. Thus the exponential inverse is exp⁡(−X) and both inverse bijections have the stated domains.

3.1F1step 1.1step 1.3algebra∎

Expanding exp⁡(X)Texp⁡(−X) modulo FnE and collecting the terms containing a total of r copies of X gives ∑j=0r(−1)jXr−jTXj/((r−j)!j!)=(ad⁡X)r(T)/r!. Passing to limits gives the conjugation identity. If E is graded and ∣X∣=0, its graded commutator with T is exactly the ordinary commutator used here, so the same proof applies in every fixed homogeneous degree. In the degreewise-complete variant, perform the scalar substitutions and exponential inverses entirely in the complete unital algebra E0. Every term Xr−jTXj has degree d, so the conjugation coefficient sums and their limit lie in the complete component Ed. Multiplicativity gives continuity of the left and right E0 actions on Ed, justifying those limits. This proves the graded variant without allowing a sum of endomorphisms in varying degrees.

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A differential graded algebra is an A∞-algebra with no higher products

Statement

Let k be a field and let (A,d,μ) be a cohomological differential graded algebra over k in the convention of Cohomological differential graded algebra. Put m1=d, m2=μ, and mn=0 for all n≥3. Then these maps make A an uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention of Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and a cohomological differential graded algebra (A,d,μ) over k.

[F1]

Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention: the maps mn must have degree 2−n and satisfy the all-arity Stasheff identity.

[F2]

Cohomological differential graded algebra: the DGA multiplication is associative of degree zero, d has degree +1 and d2=0, and for homogeneous a,b, d(ab)=d(a)b+(−1)∣a∣ad(b).

[F4]

The first three Stasheff identities: the first three A∞ equations are the square-zero, derivation, and associator-homotopy identities displayed there.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3

The maps have the required degrees: m1=d has degree +1=2−1, m2=μ has degree 0=2−2, and each zero map mn for n≥3 is a homogeneous map of degree 2−n. The ring and field hypotheses agree by [F3].

1.2F2F4

By [F2], d2=0 and d satisfies the signed Leibniz rule, so the first two identities of [F4] hold for m1=d and m2=μ.

1.3F2F4algebra

Since m3=0, the third identity of [F4] reduces to μ(μ⊗1)−μ(1⊗μ)=0, which is associativity from [F2].

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

For n≥4, any nonzero summand in the Stasheff sum would require both the inner arity s and the outer arity r+1+t to lie in {1,2}. But n=r+s+t=s+(r+1+t)−1≤3, contradicting n≥4. Thus every term in each such sum is zero.

3.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1∎

Steps 1.2, 1.3, and 2.1 verify the Stasheff identity in every arity, so the specified maps define the claimed A∞-structure.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Minimal A∞-model

Definition

Let A be an uncurved A∞-algebra (Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention). A minimal A∞-model for A is an uncurved A∞-algebra H with m1H=0, together with an A∞ quasi-isomorphism f:H→A. Here an A∞ quasi-isomorphism is as defined in A∞-morphism and quasi-isomorphism. In an explicit model whose underlying graded space is identified with H∗(A,m1A), the binary product is ordinarily checked against the product induced by m2A; this definition does not assert an existence or transfer theorem.

This is a definition of the data required for a minimal model. It does not assert that every A∞-algebra has one or that a transfer theorem has been proved.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The reduced graded symmetric coalgebra is cofree conilpotent cocommutative

Statement

Let W be a graded vector space over a characteristic-zero field and let Sc(W) be the reduced graded symmetric coalgebra of Reduced graded symmetric coalgebra with its shuffle coproduct. Let C be any graded k-vector space with a degree-zero reduced coproduct ΔˉC:C→C⊗kC that is coassociative and graded-cocommutative (invariant under the graded flip), with no counit. Assume that for every c∈C some iterated reduced coproduct of c is zero; such a coalgebra is called conilpotent here. A coalgebra morphism is a degree-zero linear map commuting with the reduced coproduct. For any degree-zero linear map ϕ:C→W, there is a unique degree-zero coalgebra morphism G:C→Sc(W) whose length-one projection is ϕ. Explicitly, let ρn:W⊗n→Sn(W) be the quotient map, put ΔˉC(0)=id⁡C, and define iterates recursively by ΔˉC(n)=(ΔˉC(n−1)⊗1)ΔˉC; coassociativity makes the parenthesization immaterial. Then

G(c)=∑n≥11n!ρn ⁣(ϕ⊗nΔˉC(n−1)(c)).

The sum is finite for each c by conilpotence. In particular, the graded symmetric coalgebra is the reduced cofree conilpotent cocommutative coalgebra on W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A conilpotent graded cocommutative noncounital coalgebra C, a graded vector space W over a characteristic-zero field, and a degree-zero linear map ϕ:C→W.

[F1]

Reduced graded symmetric coalgebra with its shuffle coproduct: Sc(W) is the direct sum of the positive graded symmetric powers with the reduced shuffle coproduct.

[F2]

The graded shuffle coproduct is coassociative, cocommutative, and conilpotent: Sc(W) is coassociative and cocommutative, and its primitive subspace is W.

[F4]

Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations: graded permutations and tensor maps use the displayed Koszul signs.

Proof

1.1givenF1construct

For fixed c∈C, conilpotence makes ΔˉC(n−1)(c)=0 for all sufficiently large n, so the displayed sum defines an element of the direct sum Sc(W). Its length-one projection is the n=1 term ϕ(c); every n>1 term has length n and projects to zero.

1.2F1F2F4algebra

To check the coalgebra-map identity, fix n=p+q in the formula for G(c) and put Dn=ΔˉC(n−1)(c). Coassociativity and cocommutativity imply that Dn is invariant under graded permutations of its n outputs: adjacent swaps follow by applying coassociativity to isolate two adjacent outputs and then using cocommutativity on that pair. Applying the shuffle coproduct to the length-n symmetric class sums over the (np) choices of the p labels in the first block. Since Dn is graded-symmetric, these choices give the same projected class, with the Koszul signs prescribed by [F4]. Their total coefficient is (np)/n!=1/(p!q!). On the other side, (G⊗G)ΔˉC(c) has the same grouped iterated coproduct by coassociativity, and its length-(p,q) coefficient is also 1/(p!q!). Thus the two sides agree in every length and ΔˉG=(G⊗G)ΔˉC.

1.3F1F2algebra

Suppose G′ is another coalgebra morphism with π1G′=ϕ. Applying the iterated coproduct into n factors and then π1⊗n gives π1⊗nΔˉSc(W)(n−1)G′(c)=ϕ⊗nΔˉC(n−1)(c). Only the length-n component of G′(c) can survive on the left: a shorter length cannot split into n positive factors, while a longer length leaves some factor of length greater than one, killed by π1. This length behavior follows directly from the coproduct in [F1].

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.3∎

For a length-n element, the left side of step 1.3 is the sum over all n! permutations in the iterated unshuffle coproduct. Applying ρn to that tensor sum yields n! times the length-n component, because all permuted factors represent the same graded-symmetric class with their Koszul signs canceled by the quotient relation. Hence that component is forced to be 1n!ρn ⁣(ϕ⊗nΔˉC(n−1)(c)), which is the length-n component in the displayed formula for G. Since this holds for every n, G′=G.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Coderivations of the reduced graded symmetric coalgebra are determined by corestrictions

Statement

Let W and Sc(W) be as in Reduced graded symmetric coalgebra with its shuffle coproduct. For any family of degree +1 graded-symmetric maps qn:Sn(W)→W, n≥1, the formula

Q(w1⊙⋯⊙wN)=∑n=1N ∑σ∈Sh⁡(n,N−n)ϵ(σ;w1,…,wN)qn(wσ(1)⊙⋯⊙wσ(n))⊙wσ(n+1)⊙⋯⊙wσ(N)

defines a degree +1 coderivation of Sc(W). It is the unique such coderivation whose projection to S1(W)=W on Sn(W) is qn. For n=N, the final tail is empty and the term means just qN(wσ(1)⊙⋯⊙wσ(N)); in this case Sh⁡(N,0) contains only the identity permutation.

Here a degree-one coderivation is a linear map Q:Sc(W)→Sc(W) that satisfies

ΔˉQ=(Q⊗1+1⊗Q)Δˉ,

where the tensor map 1⊗Q uses the Koszul sign rule. The sum defining Q is finite on each input because n≤N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A characteristic-zero graded vector space W, its reduced shuffle coalgebra, and graded-symmetric degree-one maps qn:Sn(W)→W.

[F1]

Reduced graded symmetric coalgebra with its shuffle coproduct: the coproduct is a sum over unshuffles with Koszul signs, and its primitive subspace is W by The graded shuffle coproduct is coassociative, cocommutative, and conilpotent.

[F2]

Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations: composing graded tensor maps and reordering homogeneous factors multiplies their Koszul signs.

Proof

1.1F1F2construct

The formula is well-defined on the graded-symmetric quotient: replacing a representative by an adjacent graded swap bijects the unshuffle summands, and the Koszul sign in [F2] gives the same graded-symmetric output. Each term is finite because its consumed arity is at most the input length.

1.2F1F2algebra

In ΔˉQ(x), choose the n input labels consumed by one qn, then split the qn output and the unused labels into two nonempty ordered blocks. The same terms occur in (Q⊗1+1⊗Q)Δˉ(x) by first splitting the original labels into those two blocks and applying Q to the block containing the chosen qn inputs. These are the same ordered three-block decompositions; their signs agree by [F2], including the crossing sign from 1⊗Q. Thus the formula satisfies the coderivation identity.

1.3F1induction

Let Q′ be another coderivation with the same corestrictions and put D=Q−Q′. We prove by induction on input length that D=0. On length one, D is its zero corestriction. Assume D=0 on all lengths below N. For x∈SN(W), every tensor factor in Δˉ(x) has length below N; the coderivation identity therefore gives ΔˉD(x)=0. Hence D(x) is primitive.

2.1F1step 1.3discharge-induction∎

By [F1], primitive elements are exactly W, and the length-one projection of D(x) is zero because Q and Q′ have the same corestrictions. Thus D(x)=0. This completes the induction for every finite length, so Q=Q′.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Unsuspended A∞ identities are tensor codifferentials with explicit suspension signs

Statement

Let A be a graded vector space over a field and let mn:A⊗n→A have degree 2−n, n≥1. Use the Koszul tensor-map convention of Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations. Write X=A[1], Xj=Aj+1, and let sA:A→X have degree −1 with inverse uA of degree +1. Put cn=n(n−1)/2 and define

bn=(−1)cnsAmnuA⊗n:X⊗n⟶X.

Equivalently bnsA⊗n=sAmn and mn=uAbnsA⊗n. Each bn has degree one. On homogeneous elements this formula reads

bn(sAa1,…,sAan)=(−1)∑j=1n(n−j)∣aj∣sAmn(a1,…,an).

Define the reduced tensor coalgebra Tc(X)=⨁n≥1X⊗n with reduced deconcatenation, and its coaugmented version T+c(X)=k⋅1⊕Tc(X) with

Δ(x1⋯xN)=∑i=0N(x1⋯xi)⊗(xi+1⋯xN).

Empty words mean 1. The bn extend uniquely to a degree-one coderivation B:T+c(X)→T+c(X) with B(1)=0, zero counit and corestrictions bn. Explicitly

B∣X⊗N=∑r+s+t=Nr,t≥0, s≥11⊗r⊗bs⊗1⊗t.

Then B2=0 if and only if the mn satisfy precisely the unsuspended A∞ identities of Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention, with sign (−1)r+st in every arity. This gives a bijection between those uncurved structures and such square-zero coderivations. The same correspondence holds after removing the coaugmentation summand. No arity-zero operation or tensor completion is included.

Moreover, for structures on A,D and homogeneous maps fn:A⊗n→D of degree 1−n, define degree-zero maps

Fn=(−1)cnsDfnuA⊗n.

They extend uniquely to a coaugmentation- and counit-preserving coalgebra map F:T+c(A[1])→T+c(D[1]), and FBA=BDF if and only if f satisfies exactly A∞-morphism and quasi-isomorphism, including its right-hand sign

η(i1,…,iq)=∑j=1q−1(q−j)(ij−1).

Composition of these coalgebra maps corresponds to the unsuspended Taylor composition hN=∑q, i1+⋯+iq=N(−1)ηgq(fi1⊗⋯⊗fiq). In particular the correspondence respects identities.

The fixed signs give b1=sAm1uA and b2=−sAm2(uA⊗uA). The latter is an equality of graded maps: evaluated on sAa⊗sAb it is (−1)∣a∣sAm2(a,b). Replacing every bn simultaneously by −bn preserves both the square-zero condition and the morphism equation when done on both algebras; changing just one arity is not part of this correspondence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The graded spaces, positive-arity operation and morphism families, suspension maps and tensor convention in the statement.

[F1]

Uncurved cohomological A∞-algebra in the unsuspended convention fixes ∣mn∣=2−n and the identities ∑r+s+t=N(−1)r+stmr+1+t(1⊗r⊗ms⊗1⊗t)=0.

[F2]

A∞-morphism and quasi-isomorphism fixes ∣fn∣=1−n and the morphism identities with signs r+st on the left and η on the right.

[F3]

Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations gives (p⊗q)(x⊗y)=(−1)∣q∣∣x∣p(x)⊗q(y) and its iterated form.

Proof

1.1F3algebra

Applying [F3] to the composite tensor maps gives uA⊗nsA⊗n=(−1)cnid⁡ and sA⊗nuA⊗n=(−1)cnid⁡. Thus the displayed formulas for mn and bn are mutually inverse. The degree of bn is −1+(2−n)+n=1. On inputs sAaj the tensor map uA⊗n contributes exponent ∑j(n−j)(∣aj∣−1); adding cn=∑j(n−j) gives the stated evaluation formula. For Fn exactly the same computation gives degree zero, inverse fn=uDFnsA⊗n, and evaluation Fn(sAa1,…,sAan)=(−1)∑j(n−j)∣aj∣sDfn(a1,…,an).

1.2F3constructalgebra

More generally any degree-d maps vn:X⊗n→X extend by the consecutive insertion formula V(1)=0, V(x1⋯xN)=∑r+s+t=N(−1)d∑j≤r∣xj∣x1⋯xrvs(xr+1,…,xr+s)xr+s+1⋯xN. It is finite on every word, has zero counit, and satisfies ΔV=(V⊗1+1⊗V)Δ. Indeed a cut of the output word is either before or after the single replaced block. These choices correspond respectively to acting on the suffix or prefix at the corresponding cut of the input word; the Koszul sign on 1⊗V accounts for moving V across the prefix. Coaugmentation terms satisfy the same equation because V(1)=0.

2.1step 1.2algebra

These extensions are unique. For a coderivation with zero counit and zero corestrictions, assume inductively it vanishes on shorter nonempty words. Its coderivation identity on a word of length N then says that its value has zero reduced coproduct, so is primitive. In a tensor coalgebra with zero scalar part, a primitive lies in X: for each component of length j>1, the reduced coproduct component X⊗X⊗(j−1) is the canonical injective splitting of that component, hence cannot vanish unless it does. The primitive value has zero length-one projection by the corestriction hypothesis, hence is zero. This proves the induction, starting at length one. In particular the insertion extension defines the asserted unique B without any cofree assertion left unproved.

2.2F3step 1.1algebra

Fix r+s+t=N, put k=r+1+t, and compare one projected term with sAmk(1⊗r⊗ms⊗1⊗t)uA⊗N. Evaluating on sAa1,…,sAaN by [F3] cancels all input-dependent sign differences: the inner insertion on suspended inputs contributes ∑j≤r(∣aj∣−1), the inner tensor of uA contributes ∑j=1s(s−j)(∣ar+j∣−1), and the outer tensor of uA uses the middle unsuspended output degree ∑j=1s∣ar+j∣+2−s with coefficient t. On the comparison map the corresponding input insertion sign is (2−s)∑j≤r∣aj∣ after applying uA⊗N. Subtracting these exponents leaves the input-independent difference D=−r−cs−ck+t(2−s)+cN, in addition to the prefactor cs+ck from the two b maps. Hence the total difference is cN−r+t(2−s), congruent to cN+r+st modulo two. We have proved in every arity the exact map identity bk(1⊗r⊗bs⊗1⊗t)=(−1)cN+r+stsAmk(1⊗r⊗ms⊗1⊗t)uA⊗N.

2.3F3step 1.1algebra

On the right write pj=i1+⋯+ij−1, and evaluate a fixed block term on sAa1,…,sAaN. The suspended coefficient has exponent E=∑j∑ℓ=1ij(ij−ℓ)∣apj+ℓ∣+∑j(q−j)(∑ℓ=1ij∣apj+ℓ∣+1−ij), by step 1.1 applied first to the F blocks and then to bqD. The comparison map sDmqD(fi1⊗⋯⊗fiq)uA⊗N has exponent E′=∑h=1N(N−h)∣ah∣−cN+∑j(1−ij)∑h≤pj∣ah∣. For the input in position pj+ℓ, both exponents have coefficient ij−ℓ+q−j; this follows in E′ by replacing the remaining tail length with ∑v>jiv. Their difference is thus E−E′=cN+∑j(q−j)(1−ij), congruent to cN+η(i1,…,iq). This proves bqD(Fi1⊗⋯⊗Fiq)=(−1)cN+ηsDmqD(fi1⊗⋯⊗fiq)uA⊗N.

3.1F3step 1.2step 2.1algebra

The square of a degree-one coderivation is again a coderivation: expand (B⊗1+1⊗B)2 and use [F3]; the mixed terms are B⊗B and −B⊗B and cancel over any field. It has zero counit and vanishes on 1. Its length-one projection on X⊗N is therefore ∑r+s+t=Nbr+1+t(1⊗r⊗bs⊗1⊗t). By uniqueness from step 2.1, B2=0 is equivalent to the vanishing of all these projections.

3.2F3step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

For degree-zero corestrictions Fn define F(1)=1 and F(x1⋯xN)=∑q=1N∑i1+⋯+iq=N, ij≥1Fi1(x1,…,xi1)⊗⋯⊗Fiq(xN−iq+1,…,xN). There is no factorial because blocks are consecutive and ordered. A deconcatenation cut of this output is between two output blocks, and corresponds to a cut of the input together with consecutive partitions of its two pieces. Therefore ΔF=(F⊗F)Δ; no additional map-interchange sign occurs because the Fn have degree zero. This defines a counit- and coaugmentation-preserving coalgebra map. Uniqueness follows by induction on input length: two maps agreeing on shorter words and on their corestrictions have primitive difference on the next word, and step 2.1 makes that difference zero.

3.3F3step 1.1step 2.2algebra

On the left, the sign calculation of step 2.2 is unchanged when the outer mk is replaced by fk: that calculation uses the degree 2−s of the inner operation, and its outer input degrees, not the degree of the outer operation. It gives Fk(1⊗r⊗bsA⊗1⊗t)=(−1)cN+r+stsDfk(1⊗r⊗msA⊗1⊗t)uA⊗N.

4.1F1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 2.2algebra

Summing the identity of step 2.2 factors out the invertible outer maps sA,uA⊗N and the common sign (−1)cN. The resulting equation is exactly [F1]. Steps 1.1 and 3.1 thus prove both implications and the structure bijection, with no characteristic restriction or division. All the insertion and uniqueness arguments restrict to the reduced coalgebra, and extending a reduced coderivation by zero on 1 recovers its unique counital coaugmented version. This proves the structure assertion, including the absence of nullary terms.

4.2F3step 1.2step 2.1step 3.2algebra

The map DF=FBA−BDF vanishes on 1, has zero counit, and obeys ΔDF=(DF⊗F+F⊗DF)Δ. This follows by expanding the coderivation and coalgebra-map identities, using degree zero for F. If all length-one corestrictions of DF vanish, induction on input length makes all its values primitive and then zero, exactly as in step 2.1. Consequently FBA=BDF is equivalent to equality of their length-one projections in every arity. The left projection is ∑r+s+t=NFk(1⊗r⊗bsA⊗1⊗t) and the right is ∑q, i1+⋯+iq=NbqD(Fi1⊗⋯⊗Fiq).

5.1F2step 1.1step 3.2step 4.2step 3.3step 2.3algebra

Equating the two projections from step 4.2 and substituting the two sign comparisons cancels their common invertible maps and sign (−1)cN. What remains is precisely [F2], including its actual right-hand exponent η. Conversely those identities give zero projections, hence the full coalgebra equation by step 4.2. The coefficient transformations in step 1.1 are invertible, and step 3.2 gives unique coalgebra extensions, so this is a bijection on the native morphisms as asserted.

6.1F3step 1.1step 3.2step 2.3algebra∎

For a second family g the length-one projection of GF is the sum of Gq(Fi1⊗⋯⊗Fiq). The sign calculation of step 2.3 only uses the degrees 1−ij of the inner f maps and the input evaluation formula for the outer suspended map. Replacing the outer mqD by gq therefore gives the same sign cN+η. Desuspending by the inverse transformation from step 1.1 yields the stated composition coefficients. The identity coalgebra map has only F1=id⁡, which desuspends to f1=id⁡ and fn=0 for n>1. Finally the explicit arity-one and arity-two formulas follow from c1=0,c2=1; the degree of sAa makes the binary evaluation sign (−1)∣a∣. Simultaneously negating all coderivation coefficients negates B, so leaves B2=0 and FBA=BDF unchanged when done on both sides. This establishes all sign and compatibility claims.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Coalgebra automorphisms congruent to the identity are exactly coderivation exponentials

Statement

For the coefficient-complete tensor or symmetric carrier in Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation, exponential and logarithm restrict to mutually inverse bijections

F1l0 ⟷ {G: G is an allowed identity-modulo-I coalgebra automorphism}.

In particular the logarithm of every such automorphism is a continuous counital coaugmentation-preserving coderivation; no finite-dimensionality or algebraic nilpotence of I is required.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The carrier and allowed automorphisms in the stated definition.

[F1]

Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra proves completeness and multiplicativity of the endomorphism filtration and closedness of the coderivation equations.

[F2]

Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra proves the convergent inverse exponential/logarithm bijections in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra.

[F3]

Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation specifies the carrier, explicitly completed tensor target, zero-nullary coderivation equation, and the full allowed automorphism group.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenconstruct

The complete degree-zero endomorphism algebra E0 and its closed degree-zero coderivation subspace are supplied by Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra. Thus Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra defines inverse exponential and logarithm series on positive-order degree-zero endomorphisms. All subsequent identities can be checked in Cn=C⊗kB/In and its tensor target and then passed to limits.

1.2F3givenconstructalgebra

Conversely, let G be allowed and N=G−id⁡. On Cn, Nn=0. Define the endomorphism-valued polynomial Pn(t)=∑j=0n−1(tj)Nj. For every nonnegative integer m, the finite binomial theorem gives Pn(m)=Gm. Since Gm is a counital coaugmented coalgebra map, ΔPn(m)=(Pn(m)⊗Pn(m))Δ, Pn(m)(1C)=1C, and ϵPn(m)=ϵ.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

For X∈F1l0, induction on j using its coderivation equation gives ΔXj=(X⊗1+1⊗X)jΔ. The operators X⊗1 and 1⊗X commute because X has degree zero. Each is of positive coefficient order, so the exponential and binomial calculations are finite in each quotient. Consequently Δexp⁡X=(exp⁡X⊗exp⁡X)Δ. Also exp⁡X(1C)=1C and ϵexp⁡X=ϵ, because every positive power of X kills 1C and is killed by ϵ. Its inverse exp⁡(−X) has the same properties. Hence exponential gives an allowed automorphism.

2.2step 1.2algebra

Each difference in these three identities is a polynomial in t with coefficients in a k-vector space of maps. A polynomial of degree at most a with such coefficients vanishing at a+1 distinct nonnegative integers has zero coefficients: apply the inverse of their scalar Vandermonde matrix over the characteristic-zero field k. This does not require finite-dimensional map spaces or any domain property of B/In. Therefore the identities of step 1.2 hold as polynomial identities for the indeterminate t.

3.1step 2.2algebra

Differentiate those polynomial identities at t=0. Since Pn(0)=id⁡, the result is ΔPn′(0)=(Pn′(0)⊗1+1⊗Pn′(0))Δ, Pn′(0)(1C)=0, and ϵPn′(0)=0. For j≥1, differentiation of t(t−1)⋯(t−j+1)/j! at zero gives (−1)j−1/j. Thus Pn′(0)=∑j=1n−1(−1)j−1Nj/j, exactly the reduction of log⁡G.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

These reductions are compatible for all n, and the coderivation, counit, and coaugmentation identities are closed in the completed targets. Therefore log⁡G∈F1l0. Step 1.1 gives inverse identities for the underlying endomorphisms, and step 2.1 shows that every positive-order degree-zero coderivation exponentiates into the allowed group. The restrictions are therefore mutually inverse bijections onto the entire stated group.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Shifted coalgebra definition of an L∞-algebra

Definition

Let k be a characteristic-zero field (Field, The characteristic of a ring: the least n≥1 with n⋅1R=0 when one exists, and 0 otherwise), and let V=⨁j∈ZVj be a graded k-vector space. Use the cohomological suspension

W=V[1],Wj=Vj+1.

The reduced cofree conilpotent cocommutative coalgebra on W is the Sc(W)=⨁n≥1Sn(W) of Reduced graded symmetric coalgebra with its shuffle coproduct, with its cofree property proved in The reduced graded symmetric coalgebra is cofree conilpotent cocommutative.

An L∞-algebra on V in the shifted coalgebra convention is a degree +1 coderivation Q:Sc(W)→Sc(W) with Q2=0 and no arity-zero component. A coderivation satisfies ΔˉQ=(Q⊗1+1⊗Q)Δˉ, with the Koszul sign on 1⊗Q, as defined in Coderivations of the reduced graded symmetric coalgebra are determined by corestrictions. Its corestrictions are

qn=π1Q∣Sn(W):Sn(W)⟶W,∣qn∣=+1(n≥1),

where π1:Sc(W)→S1(W)=W is the length-one projection. Conversely, each such family determines a unique coderivation by that lemma. The condition Q2=0 is equivalent to the higher Jacobi identities proved in Square-zero coderivations are equivalent to the shifted higher Jacobi identities ↗.

This is the shifted convention only: no unsuspended skew operations ln or translation formula for them is asserted. Curved L∞ structures with an arity-zero term are outside this definition.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Square-zero coderivations are equivalent to the shifted higher Jacobi identities

Statement

Let Q be the degree-one coderivation of Shifted coalgebra definition of an L∞-algebra, with corestrictions qi:Si(W)→W. For each n≥1, define

Jn(w1,…,wn)=∑i=1n ∑σ∈Sh⁡(i,n−i)ϵ(σ;w1,…,wn) qn−i+1 ⁣(qi(wσ(1)⊙⋯⊙wσ(i))⊙wσ(i+1)⊙⋯⊙wσ(n)),

where Sh⁡(n,0) contains only the identity and an empty tail after qi is omitted. Then Q2=0 if and only if Jn(w1,…,wn)=0 for every n and all homogeneous wj∈W. These are the shifted higher Jacobi identities; for n=1 the identity is q12=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A reduced graded symmetric coalgebra Sc(W), a degree-one coderivation Q, and its corestrictions qn.

[F1]

Shifted coalgebra definition of an L∞-algebra: Q has degree +1 and satisfies the coderivation equation with the graded tensor convention.

[F2]

Coderivations of the reduced graded symmetric coalgebra are determined by corestrictions: a coderivation is uniquely determined by its corestrictions.

[F3]

The graded shuffle coproduct is coassociative, cocommutative, and conilpotent: the only primitive elements of Sc(W) are the length-one elements W.

[F4]

Koszul sign rule for graded tensor products and permutations: moving homogeneous factors past one another contributes the displayed Koszul signs.

Proof

1.1F1F4algebra

The square Q2 is a coderivation of degree 2. Indeed, applying the coderivation equation twice gives ΔˉQ2=(Q⊗1+1⊗Q)2Δˉ=(Q2⊗1+1⊗Q2)Δˉ, because the two cross terms are Q⊗Q and −Q⊗Q by [F4].

1.2F1F2F4algebra

On an input of symmetric length n, the projection π1Q2 can be nonzero only when the first application of Q consumes i inputs by qi and the second consumes the resulting qi output together with all n−i unused inputs by qn−i+1. The first application ranges over exactly the (i,n−i)-unshuffles; its coefficient is ϵ(σ;w1,…,wn), and the second unshuffle has only one term because it must consume every remaining factor. Thus (π1Q2)∣Sn(W)=Jn.

2.1step 1.2algebra

If Q2=0, then every projection π1Q2∣Sn(W) is zero, so step 1.2 gives Jn=0 for all n.

2.2step 1.1step 1.2F3induction

Conversely, suppose Jn=0 for every n. By step 1.2, every corestriction of the coderivation Q2 is zero. We show by induction on input length that Q2=0. On length one it is zero by its corestriction. If it vanishes on all smaller lengths, its coderivation equation makes the reduced coproduct of Q2(x) zero for an input x of the next length. By [F3], Q2(x) is then in W, and its zero corestriction forces Q2(x)=0.

3.1step 2.2discharge-induction∎

The induction covers every finite symmetric length, which exhausts the direct sum Sc(W). Hence Q2=0, proving the converse.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Complete filtered L∞-algebra

Definition

Let (V,Q) be an L∞-algebra in the shifted convention of Shifted coalgebra definition of an L∞-algebra, with W=V[1] and corestrictions qn:Sn(W)→W. A complete filtered L∞-algebra is this data together with a descending filtration by graded subspaces

F1W⊇F2W⊇F3W⊇⋯

such that both of the following conditions hold:

  1. For every fixed degree j, the natural map from Wj to the compatible homogeneous cosets (wr+(FrW)j)r≥1,wr∈Wj,wr+1−wr∈(FrW)j, is a bijection. Thus the filtration is separated and complete in each degree: Wj≅lim←⁡rWj/(FrW)j. All graded inverse limits here and in the filtered Maurer–Cartan constructions are taken degreewise. The underlying graded space remains ⨁jWj; completeness does not assert convergence of sums of terms in unboundedly varying degrees.
  2. For every n≥1 and positive integers r1,…,rn, qn(Fr1W,…,FrnW)⊆Fr1+⋯+rnW.

This definition imposes an algebraic filtration topology only; it makes no analytic convergence assertion. The next theorem proves that the Maurer–Cartan series converges for each w∈F1W0.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The Maurer–Cartan series converges in a complete filtered L∞-algebra

Statement

Let W be the shifted graded space of a complete filtered L∞-algebra over a characteristic-zero field, and let w∈F1W0. Then the series

∑n≥11n!qn(w,…,w)

converges uniquely in the filtration topology to an element of W1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complete filtered L∞-algebra over a characteristic-zero field and an element w∈F1W0.

[F1]

Complete filtered L∞-algebra: the filtration is complete and qn(Fr1,…,Frn)⊆Fr1+⋯+rn.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

For every n≥1, [F1] with each ri=1 gives qn(w,…,w)∈FnW. Since qn has degree +1 and w has degree zero, each term lies in FnW1. By [F2], division by n! is defined and does not change the filtration level.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Fix r≥1. If n≥r, then FnW⊆FrW, so every term of index n≥r vanishes in W/FrW. Therefore the partial sums stabilize modulo FrW once the upper index is at least r−1.

3.1F1step 2.1construct∎

These stabilized residues are compatible under the quotient maps W/Fr+1W→W/FrW, because they come from the same nested partial sums. All residues have degree one, so degreewise completeness in [F1] gives a unique element of W1 having all these residues. The partial sums converge to it in the filtration topology.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Filtered L∞-morphism

Definition

Let W=V[1] and Z=U[1] be the shifted spaces of two complete filtered L∞-algebras over the same characteristic-zero field, in the convention of Complete filtered L∞-algebra. Write Q,R for their degree-one square-zero coderivations and qn,rn for their corestrictions. A filtered L∞-morphism from W to Z consists of degree-zero graded symmetric maps fn:SnW→Z, n≥1, with

fn(Fi1W,…,FinW)⊆Fi1+⋯+inZ(ij≥1),

whose associated coaugmented coalgebra map F:k⊕Sc(W)→k⊕Sc(Z) satisfies FQ=RF, after extending Q,R by Q(1)=R(1)=0. There is no constant Taylor coefficient: F(1)=1. Explicitly, for homogeneous inputs,

F(x1⋯xn)=∑s=1n1s!∑(B1,…,Bs)ϵ(B1,…,Bs;x) f∣B1∣(xB1)⋯f∣Bs∣(xBs).

The inner sum runs over ordered partitions of {1,…,n} into nonempty blocks. Inside each block retain the original input order; ϵ is the Koszul sign of the permutation which lists those blocks in the indicated order. The factor 1/s! removes ordering of the graded symmetric output blocks. The length-one projection of F on SnW is fn.

The composite of f:W→Z and g:Z→T has associated map GF; its Taylor coefficients are the length-one projections of GF. The identity has f1=id⁡ and fn=0 for n>1. These definitions do not require F1W=W. The complete positive-filtration subalgebra P=F1W is the space on which completed exponentials and Maurer–Cartan sums will be used; it need not be an ideal in W.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Maurer–Cartan element of a complete filtered L∞-algebra

Definition

For a complete filtered L∞-algebra in the convention of Complete filtered L∞-algebra, a Maurer–Cartan element is an element w∈F1W0 satisfying

∑n≥11n!qn(w,…,w)=0.

The series is the unique limit proved in The Maurer–Cartan series converges in a complete filtered L∞-algebra. This equation defines a set of solutions; it does not by itself specify a deformation problem or an equivalence relation on those solutions.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Filtered Taylor maps extend to the completed coaugmented symmetric coalgebra

Statement

Let f:W→Z be a filtered L∞-morphism as in Filtered L∞-morphism, and put P=F1W, P′=F1Z. On C(P)=⨁n≥0SnP, including S0P=k⋅1, use the symmetric multiplication and the counital coproduct

Δ(x1⋯xn)=∑I⊔J={1,…,n}ϵ(I,J;x)xI⊗xJ.

Empty subsets are allowed. Define FNC(P) as the span of products x1⋯xn with xj∈FijW, all ij≥1, and ∑jij≥N; scalars have weight zero. Define the completed coaugmented symmetric coalgebra

C^(P)=lim←⁡NC(P)/FNC(P).

All completions and limits are degreewise. Complete tensor products for coproducts with the sum of the two weight filtrations. Then multiplication, coproduct, counit and coaugmentation extend continuously, as do Q and the Taylor map F. Their continuous extensions satisfy Q2=0, ΔF=(F⊗^F)Δ, and FQ=RF. The length-one projection extends continuously to pP:C^(P)→P.

For w∈P0 and homogeneous v∈FpW, p≥1, define the convergent expressions

ew=∑n≥0wnn!,cq(w)=∑n≥1qn(wn)n!,u=f∗(w)=∑n≥1fn(wn)n!.

They satisfy

Δew=ew⊗ew,ewe−w=1,Q(ew)=cq(w)ew,F(ew)=eu,

and the marked-input identity

F(vew)=(∑n≥0fn+1(wn,v)n!)eu.

This is a total filtration weight completion on the positive-filtration subalgebra, not an unspecified product by symmetric arity on all of W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Complete filtered shifted L∞-algebras over a characteristic-zero field and a filtered Taylor morphism between them.

[F1]

Filtered L∞-morphism supplies the filtration bounds, the finite Taylor partition formula, FQ=RF, and the complete filtered algebra convention.

[F2]

The graded shuffle coproduct is coassociative, cocommutative, and conilpotent proves that primitives of the algebraic graded symmetric coalgebra are exactly its length-one part.

Proof

1.1F1constructalgebra

The subalgebra P=F1W is complete and separated in each fixed degree for its induced filtration: a compatible homogeneous family of one fixed degree in P/FNW defines a compatible family in W/FNW, whose unique lift lies in the kernel of W→W/F1W, namely P. The same argument applies degreewise and to P′. Products and coproducts preserve total weight: for a product weights add, and a split of a monomial preserves the sum of the two output weights. They therefore extend to the inverse limits and their completed tensor targets, retaining the algebra and coalgebra identities since these hold on the dense uncompleted subspaces. Scalars, the counit and the coaugmentation extend as well. The length-one projection takes FNC(P) into FNW, so it extends to P.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

On C(P) the coderivation formula is Q(1)=0 and Q(x1⋯xm)=∑∅≠I⊆{1,…,m}ϵ(I,Ic;x)q∣I∣(xI)xIc. Each term has at least the input's total weight by the bound on q∣I∣. Thus Q is continuous and extends. The coderivation identity can be checked by selecting the nonempty distinguished block acted on by q and distributing all remaining factors to the two coproduct outputs; both sides make precisely these selections. The Koszul signs agree, including the sign from moving the degree-one Q across the left output when it acts on the right output. The given Q2=0 continues to hold by density and continuity.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The partition formula for F is finite on each monomial and preserves its total weight. In ΔF, split the output blocks between the two tensor factors. In (F⊗F)Δ, first split the inputs into the unions of those two groups and then partition each union. These choices are in bijection; the binomial number of ways of splitting ordered output blocks changes 1/s! to the product of the two output factorial coefficients. Both signs implement the same permutation of input factors. This proves the coalgebra identity directly and shows that the length-one corestrictions are exactly fn. The finite coalgebra map is determined uniquely by these corestrictions: induct on input length, subtract two such maps and use the reduced coproduct; their difference on the next input has zero reduced coproduct and hence is primitive, so lies in the length-one summand, where its projection is zero. The primitive assertion is exactly [F2], whose proof composes the singleton coproduct component with multiplication to give s times the identity on length s>1; characteristic zero makes that coefficient invertible. The weight bound extends F continuously, and FQ=RF extends from the dense subspace. Uniqueness of each continuous extension follows from separatedness of the target.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra

The term wn/n! has total weight at least n, and each of qn(wn)/n! and fn(wn)/n! lies in filtration n. All three series therefore stabilize modulo every filtration quotient and converge uniquely. The series with marked input v has its nth coefficient in filtration p+n. In characteristic zero the factorials are invertible. Every reordering of these sums is finite modulo total weight N, so it is legitimate in the inverse limit. The binomial coproduct expansion gives Δew=ew⊗ew, and the binomial multiplication expansion gives ewe−w=1.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

In Q(wm) the choice of a distinguished block of size i has multiplicity m!/(i!(m−i)!). As w has degree zero all such signs are positive. Divide by m! and sum to obtain Q(ew)=(∑i≥1qi(wi)/i!)ew=cq(w)ew. For F(wm), an ordered partition of block sizes i1,…,is occurs m!/(i1!⋯is!) times. Summing its partition formula after division by m! gives F(ew)=∑s≥0(1/s!)(∑i≥1fi(wi)/i!)s=eu.

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

To evaluate F(vew) distinguish the unique output block containing v. Choose its n unmarked inputs and apply fn+1(wn,v); the sum over partitions of all remaining inputs is eu by step 5.1. The factorials reduce to 1/n! on the marked block and the usual output factorial on the other blocks. Moving v or the marked output past copies of the degree-zero w or u produces no signs. This gives the stated marked-input identity, with convergence from step 4.1, and completes all assertions.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Filtered L∞-morphisms preserve Maurer–Cartan elements and compose on solutions

Statement

Let f:W→Z be a filtered L∞-morphism between complete filtered algebras over a characteristic-zero field. For every w∈F1W0, the Taylor series f∗(w)=∑n≥1fn(wn)/n! converges in F1Z0, and its curvature satisfies

cr(f∗(w))=∑n≥01n!fn+1(wn,cq(w)),cq(w)=∑n≥1qn(wn)n!.

Consequently f∗ defines an actual continuous map MC⁡(W)→MC⁡(Z), with Maurer–Cartan elements as in Maurer–Cartan element of a complete filtered L∞-algebra. If g:Z→T is another filtered L∞-morphism, the composite h=g∘f has Taylor coefficients

hn(x1,…,xn)=∑s=1n1s!∑(B1,…,Bs)ϵ(B1,…,Bs;x) gs(f∣B1∣(xB1),…,f∣Bs∣(xBs)),

where blocks and signs are as in Filtered L∞-morphism. The composite is filtered, and

(g∘f)∗(w)=g∗(f∗(w)).

Identity morphisms act as identities. These are equalities of convergent elements, not merely formal Taylor expressions; no quasi-isomorphism hypothesis is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Complete filtered shifted L∞-algebras over one characteristic-zero field and the stated filtered morphisms.

[F1]

Filtered Taylor maps extend to the completed coaugmented symmetric coalgebra supplies the completed coaugmented coalgebras, exponentials, curvature and marked-input identities, and continuous Taylor extensions.

[F2]

Maurer–Cartan element of a complete filtered L∞-algebra defines MC⁡(W) by w∈F1W0 and cq(w)=0.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

The series defining u=f∗(w) converges in F1Z0 by [F1]. Since FQ=RF, its exponential satisfies cr(u)eu=R(eu)=RF(ew)=FQ(ew)=F(cq(w)ew). The marked-input identity of [F1] rewrites the last expression as (∑n≥0fn+1(wn,cq(w))/n!)eu. Multiply by e−u to obtain the curvature formula. This series converges since its nth term has filtration at least n+1.

1.2F1algebra

The continuous coalgebra map GF intertwines coderivations because GFQ=GRF=SGF, where S is the coderivation on T. Its length-one projection on SnW applies gs to the length-s part of the partition formula for F, giving exactly the stated formula for hn. Every term has degree zero and additive filtration, because first the f blocks and then gs add the input filtration indices. Thus h is a filtered morphism.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

If cq(w)=0, every term on the right vanishes, so cr(f∗(w))=0 and [F2] gives the asserted map on Maurer–Cartan elements. For w−v∈FpW with w,v∈F1W0, the multilinear telescoping expansion of fn(wn)−fn(vn) has in every term one input in FpW and all other inputs in F1W, so it lies in Fp+n−1Z. Hence f∗(w)−f∗(v)∈FpZ. This proves continuity in the filtration topology.

2.2F1step 1.2algebra

For repeated degree-zero w, the coefficient formula becomes hn(wn)=∑s=1n(1/s!)∑i1+⋯+is=n, ij≥1(n!/(i1!⋯is!))gs(fi1(wi1),…,fis(wis)). After dividing by n! and summing over n, the result is ∑s≥1(1/s!)gs((∑i≥1fi(wi)/i!)s)=g∗(f∗(w)). The regrouping is finite modulo FN, since each input has filtration at least one and all terms with input count at least N vanish there. Equivalently GF(ew)=G(ef∗(w))=eg∗(f∗(w)), and projection to T gives the same result.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2algebra∎

The identity Taylor family has only its linear term nonzero, so its Taylor pushforward is w itself. Composition is associative because composition of the continuous coalgebra maps is associative; it can also be read from refinement of the finite set partitions modulo each filtration quotient. Together with the preceding calculations this proves all the claims on actual solution sets.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements

Definition

Let W be a complete filtered shifted L∞-algebra over a characteristic-zero field k. Put P=F1W with its induced filtration. This is closed and complete in each degree: it is the kernel of W→W/F1W, and compatible cosets in P/FpW have their unique W-limit in that kernel. All qn preserve P.

The completed polynomial coefficients and completed polynomial differential forms mean

P[t]∧=lim←⁡p(P/FpW)⊗kk[t],P⊗^Ω=lim←⁡p(P/FpW)⊗kk[t,dt],∣t∣=0,∣dt∣=1.

These are compatible polynomials in each quotient; their degrees need not have a common bound. Evaluation at 0,1, differentiation, and integration from 0 to t are defined in every quotient by polynomial formulas and commute with reduction; integration uses ∫0tujdu=tj+1/(j+1). Operations on these spaces are extended continuously, with each coefficient of a fixed quotient a finite sum.

Write C(w)=∑n≥1qn(wn)/n! and q1w(a)=∑n≥0qn+1(wn,a)/n!. An elementary gauge path is a pair w∈P0[t]∧, a∈P−1[t]∧ such that C(w)=0 and w′=q1w(a). Its endpoints are w(0),w(1). Gauge equivalence is the equivalence relation generated by endpoints of these paths. A constant path has a=0; reversal is (w(1−t),−a(1−t)); finite chains give transitivity. Polynomial concatenation is not required.

For the polynomial-form interpretation, forms are placed on the right. For homogeneous xi∈P, αi∈Ω, the extension of qn has scalar sign (−1)∑i<j∣αi∣∣xj∣; its unary part also contains (−1)∣x∣x⊗dα. The degree-zero form z=w−a dt then satisfies CΩ(z)=C(w)+(w′−q1w(a))dt. Thus these paths are precisely Maurer–Cartan elements over the completed polynomial interval. This fixes a gauge construction using the full operations, rather than choosing an arbitrary equivalence relation on a solution set.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Existence and uniqueness of complete filtered Maurer–Cartan gauge flow

Statement

In the setting of Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements, for every w∗∈MC⁡(P) and every a∈P−1[t]∧ there is a unique w∈P0[t]∧ with w(0)=w∗ and w′=q1w(a). It satisfies C(w)=0, so it is an elementary gauge path. Modulo every FpW the construction stabilizes after finitely many polynomial Picard iterations; no globally bounded polynomial degree is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The filtered shifted L∞-algebra, P=F1W, w∗ and a of the statement.

[F1]

Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements supplies complete polynomial coefficients, integration, C and q1w.

[F2]

Filtered Taylor maps extend to the completed coaugmented symmetric coalgebra supplies the total-weight completed coaugmented symmetric coalgebra, the continuous unshuffle coderivation Q, and the convergent group-like exponential ew.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2construct

Apply [F2] to the identity Taylor morphism of W. In its completed coalgebra, multiplication Mw(x)=ewx is a continuous coalgebra automorphism with inverse M−w, because Δ(ewx)=(ew⊗ew)Δx. Consequently Qw=M−wQMw is a coderivation and (Qw)2=0. It may have a constant term, since Mw does not preserve coaugmentation. Expanding the unshuffle formula and choosing the inputs in the distinguished q-block gives q0w=C(w) and qnw(v1,…,vn)=∑j≥0qn+j(wj,v1,…,vn)/j! for n≥1: the indistinguishable degree-zero w inputs give exactly 1/j!. Every expression is finite modulo a fixed total weight, and hence converges.

1.2F1algebra

If x−y∈FrP[t]∧ and a∈F1P−1[t]∧, then q1x(a)−q1y(a)∈Fr+1P[t]∧. The unary terms cancel; each term in the multilinear telescoping expansion of every remaining difference contains x−y and a, giving filtration at least r+1. The other inputs have positive filtration. This calculation is finite modulo each Fp.

2.1step 1.1algebra

In particular Qw(1)=C(w) and Qw(a)=C(w)a+q1w(a). Applying (Qw)2 to a and projecting to length one gives (q1w)2(a)+q2w(C(w),a)=0: the length-two term C(w)a contributes q2w(C(w),a) and the length-one term contributes (q1w)2(a); other lengths do not survive projection. Applying the same operation to 1 gives q1w(C(w))=0. These identities also hold over completed polynomial coefficients, quotient by quotient.

2.2F1step 1.2construct

Set w0(t)=w∗ and wj+1(t)=w∗+∫0tq1wj(u)(a(u))du. The first difference lies in F1; step 1.2 and induction give wj+1−wj∈Fj+1. Thus the sequence stabilizes in each quotient, where all iterates are genuine polynomials. Completeness defines w∈P0[t]∧. Reduction, integration and differentiation commute, so w(0)=w∗ and w′=q1w(a).

3.1F1step 1.2step 2.2algebra

If two solutions have the same initial value, their difference obeys the difference of the integral equations. It first lies in F1, and step 1.2 forces it successively into every Fr. Separation gives equality.

4.1F1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra∎

Termwise differentiation in each finite quotient gives ddtC(w)=q1w(w′). Hence E=C(w) satisfies E′=−q2w(E,a) by step 2.1, and E(0)=0. Its integral equation is E(t)=−∫0tq2w(u)(E(u),a(u))du. Initially E∈F1; if E∈Fr, the right side lies in Fr+1 because a∈F1. Induction and separation give E=0, completing both existence on the Maurer–Cartan locus and uniqueness.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The precise shifted L-infinity structure of a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra

Statement

Let g be a cohomologically graded Lie algebra over a characteristic-zero field: its degree-zero bracket is graded skew, satisfies graded Jacobi, and a degree-one map d satisfies d2=0 and d[x,y]=[dx,y]+(−1)∣x∣[x,dy]. Suppose its degreewise separated complete positive filtration is preserved by d and satisfies [Frg,Fsg]⊆Fr+sg. With s:g→g[1] of degree −1, set

q1(sx)=−s(dx),q2(sx,sy)=(−1)∣x∣s[x,y],qn=0 (n≥3).

These operations define a complete filtered shifted L∞-algebra. Its degree-zero Maurer–Cartan elements are exactly sR, where R∈F1g1 satisfies dR+[R,R]/2=0. Its elementary gauge paths are exactly R′=−dξ+[ξ,R] with ξ∈F1g0[t]∧, under w=sR, a=sξ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The differential graded Lie identities and filtration hypotheses in the statement.

[F1]

Square-zero coderivations are equivalent to the shifted higher Jacobi identities gives the shifted unshuffle identities equivalent to a square-zero coderivation.

[F2]

Complete filtered L∞-algebra specifies the complete additive filtration conditions.

[F3]

Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements specifies curvature and polynomial gauge paths in the shifted convention.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

The degree of each displayed operation is one. If a=∣x∣, b=∣y∣, skewsymmetry gives q2(sy,sx)=(−1)b+1+abs[x,y], so q2(sx,sy)=(−1)(a−1)(b−1)q2(sy,sx). Hence q2 descends to S2(g[1]). The unary shifted identity is q12(sx)=s(d2x)=0.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

On (sx,sy) the three arity-two terms are q1q2(sx,sy)=(−1)a+1s[dx,y]−s[x,dy], q2(q1sx,sy)=(−1)as[dx,y], and (−1)a−1q2(sx,q1sy)=s[x,dy]. They sum to zero by the differential derivation identity.

2.2givenF1step 1.1algebra

Put c=∣z∣. The three arity-three unshuffle terms, with their Koszul signs, sum to (−1)bs([[x,y],z]−(−1)bc[[x,z],y]+(−1)a(b+c)[[y,z],x]). Skewsymmetry rewrites the parenthesis as [[x,y],z]+(−1)ab[y,[x,z]]−[x,[y,z]], which is zero by graded Jacobi. In arities at least four every composition contains an operation of arity at least three and vanishes. Thus [F1] gives square zero.

3.1givenF2F3step 2.2algebra

The shifted filtration is complete and separated in each degree because the original one is; q1 preserves it and q2 adds filtration indices. All higher operations vanish. These are exactly [F2]. For R∈F1g1, the curvature is C(sR)=−s(dR+[R,R]/2) by substituting ∣R∣=1. Thus the asserted Maurer–Cartan equation is equivalent to C(sR)=0.

4.1givenF3step 3.1algebra∎

For ξ∈F1g0, q1sR(sξ)=−s(dξ)−s[R,ξ]=s(−dξ+[ξ,R]) by skewsymmetry. Applying this quotientwise to polynomial coefficients translates [F3] exactly to R′=−dξ+[ξ,R]. The degree of sξ is −1, as required for the path parameter.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Filtered L∞-morphisms preserve completed polynomial gauge equivalence

Statement

Let f:W→Z be a filtered L∞-morphism between complete filtered shifted algebras over a characteristic-zero field. It induces a map on Maurer–Cartan elements by Filtered L∞-morphisms preserve Maurer–Cartan elements and compose on solutions. It carries every completed polynomial gauge path of Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements to such a path and preserves its endpoints. Consequently it induces a map on the equivalence classes generated by those paths. These induced maps preserve identities and composition.

Put P=F1W, with its complete induced filtration, and similarly P′=F1Z. Scalar extension below is on these positive ideals. More explicitly use right-placed forms, Ω=k[t,dt], ∣t∣=0, ∣dt∣=1, d(t)=dt, (dt)2=0, and the completion

P⊗^Ω=lim←⁡N((P/FNW)⊗Ω).

Let w(t)∈F1(P⊗^k[t])0 and a(t)∈F1(P⊗^k[t])−1 satisfy

cq(w(t))=0,w′(t)=q1w(t)(a(t)),q1w(a)=∑n≥0qn+1(wn,a)n!.

Then their image path and parameter are

u(t)=f∗(w(t)),b(t)=∑n≥0fn+1(w(t)n,a(t))n!,

and satisfy cr(u(t))=0, u′(t)=r1u(t)(b(t)), with endpoints u(0)=f∗(w(0)) and u(1)=f∗(w(1)). Each coefficient function is polynomial modulo every FN; no common bound on its polynomial degree is assumed. The assertion includes the unique flows of Existence and uniqueness of complete filtered Maurer–Cartan gauge flow.

For clarity, extension to an arbitrary commutative dg scalar algebra A is part of the assertion. With P factors placed before scalar factors and homogeneous xi∈P, ai∈A, the shifted operations and morphism coefficients on P⊗^A are

q1A(x⊗a)=q1(x)⊗a+(−1)∣x∣x⊗dAa,

qnA(x1⊗a1,…,xn⊗an)=(−1)∑i<j∣ai∣∣xj∣qn(x1,…,xn)⊗a1⋯an(n≥2),

fnA(x1⊗a1,…,xn⊗an)=(−1)∑i<j∣ai∣∣xj∣fn(x1,…,xn)⊗a1⋯an(n≥1).

These define complete filtered shifted L∞-algebras and a filtered morphism, natural in dg algebra maps A→B. Their Maurer–Cartan pushforwards satisfy the same curvature and composition formulas as over the original field. This restriction is essential when the original filtration bounds do not control inputs outside F1W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The filtered morphism and completed polynomial gauge path in the statement; the scalar extension uses the stated tensor order and Koszul signs.

[F1]

Filtered L∞-morphisms preserve Maurer–Cartan elements and compose on solutions proves the convergent curvature transformation and composition identities for filtered Taylor maps, using the total weight completed coaugmented coalgebra.

[F2]

Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements defines completed polynomial gauge paths and the equivalence relation generated by their endpoints.

[F3]

Existence and uniqueness of complete filtered Maurer–Cartan gauge flow supplies the unique completed polynomial flow for an admissible parameter and initial Maurer–Cartan element.

Proof

1.1givenF1constructalgebra

For any dg scalar algebra A put P⊗^A=lim←⁡N((P/FNW)⊗A), with filtration the kernels of the projections. Each projection is surjective: lift the finitely many coefficients of any algebraic tensor to P, giving a compatible element of the inverse limit. The quotient by its kernel is therefore exactly the displayed algebraic tensor product. The limit is complete and separated, degreewise. Tensoring over the field preserves exact sequences, so each graded filtration layer is its corresponding algebraic tensor product with A. Here every input lies in P, so the additive filtration bounds also show independence of the chosen representatives modulo FNW. The operations in the statement are well defined on every quotient, and the input filtration indices add under each operation; they thus extend continuously to the limit.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

To verify the signs and identities on algebraic tensors, move each scalar ai past every later W factor xj, then apply the W operation and multiply the scalars in their original order. This gives precisely the exponent ∑i<j∣ai∣∣xj∣. This movement respects substitution: the product of its signs in two substituted operations is the sign of the composite permutation, including the sign of moving a degree-one inner operation across earlier inputs. Consequently the part of each shifted Jacobi identity involving only the extended qn is the original W identity multiplied by the common ordered scalar product. Its sum is zero. Write D(x⊗a)=(−1)∣x∣x⊗dAa for the scalar differential. For an extended operation of degree d, let E=∑i<j∣ai∣∣xj∣. The coefficient of the scalar product with dAai in the output differential has sign exponent E+∑j∣xj∣+d+∑j<i∣aj∣. The same coefficient obtained by applying the tensor differential to the ith input first has exponent E+∑j∣xj∣+∑j<i∣aj∣: the extra scalar crossing signs are ∑j>i∣xj∣, and the tensor differential contributes ∑j<i(∣xj∣+∣aj∣)+∣xi∣. Thus the two expressions differ by (−1)d. For d=1 this proves that D anticommutes with each extended qn. Also D2=0. Thus the full coderivation with unary term q1A squares to zero. This checks the scalar-differential terms as well as the original Jacobi terms.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The same permutation and substitution verification transfers FQ=RF to scalar tensors. Here each fn has degree zero, so the scalar differential commutes with fn; its Leibniz expansion supplies precisely all the terms in which a scalar differential appears on an input. Thus the stated fnA form a filtered morphism. These are finite identities on each algebraic tensor and each fixed arity. They descend to every quotient and hold on the inverse limit by continuity. Any dg algebra map ρ:A→B preserves scalar products, scalar differentials and degrees, so id⁡⊗^ρ commutes with all these operations. Applying [F1] to the extended algebras proves their curvature and composition identities; in particular ρ∗(f∗A(z))=f∗B(ρ∗(z)).

3.2F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For A=Ω, every total-degree-zero element in the positive ideal has a unique expression z=w(t)−a(t)dt with the degrees in the statement. All these functions are polynomials at each quotient and their degrees may grow with N. Differentiation, multiplication and evaluation at any λ∈k are defined quotientwise and respect the transition maps. The scalar differential of w contributes w′(t)dt. The input −a(t)dt appearing once in qn+1Ω contributes −qn+1(w(t)n,a(t))dt: place this input last, so it crosses no later W factor. Because w and −adt both have total degree zero, its n+1 possible positions contribute equally, changing 1/(n+1)! to 1/n!. Two such inputs vanish because (dt)2=0, and the scalar differential of a(t)dt vanishes for the same reason. Hence cqΩ(z)=cq(w(t))+(w′(t)−q1w(t)(a(t)))dt. In particular the equations in the statement are exactly the Maurer–Cartan equation for z.

4.1F1step 3.1step 3.2algebra

Applying the identical one-marked-input computation to f∗Ω gives f∗Ω(z)=u(t)−b(t)dt, where u=f∗w and b=∑n≥0fn+1(wn,a)/n!. Each summand of the latter series lies in filtration n+1; the corresponding statement for u is [F1]. Thus only finitely many terms survive in each quotient, and these terms are polynomials. By curvature transformation over Ω from step 3.1, z Maurer–Cartan implies u−bdt Maurer–Cartan. The curvature decomposition of step 3.2 applied on Z now proves cr(u)=0 and u′=r1u(b).

5.1F1F2F3step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1algebra

Evaluation ev⁡λ:Ω→k, t↦λ, dt↦0, is a dg algebra map. Naturality in step 3.1 yields ev⁡λf∗Ω(z)=f∗(w(λ)). In particular the endpoint values are precisely those in the statement. If the input path is specified as the unique flow supplied by [F3], it satisfies the equations in step 3.2; its image satisfies the corresponding target flow equations and is the target flow for b and initial value f∗(w(0)) by [F3]. This proves the assertion for every such input parameter as well.

6.1F1F2step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

Every generating endpoint pair for the equivalence relation in [F2] maps, by the path and endpoint calculations, to another such pair. Finite chains of generating pairs and their reverses therefore map to chains of the same kind; equality maps to equality. This proves preservation of the generated equivalence relation without claiming that a concatenation itself is polynomial. Composition and identities over Ω follow from step 3.1 and [F1]. Explicitly, for successive g the output parameter is ∑j≥0gj+1(uj,b)/j!=∑n≥0hn+1(wn,a)/n!: in the composite partition formula exactly one f block contains a. Thus the point and parameter components both compose, as do the induced quotient maps. Every equality holds modulo each FN and hence in the separated inverse limit; no globally polynomial bound or analytic integration was invoked.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Maurer–Cartan classes classify fixed-carrier codifferential deformations

Statement

Use Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation, and put g=F1l, d=[D,−]. Then

R⟼D+R

is a bijection between {R∈g1:dR+[R,R]/2=0} and all the stated fixed-carrier codifferential deformations. It identifies their equivalence classes by all allowed coalgebra automorphisms with Maurer–Cartan gauge classes of the shifted filtered L∞-algebra of The precise shifted L-infinity structure of a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra, using Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements.

More explicitly, the full allowed group is exp⁡(g0), with group operation inherited from composition, and its action on Maurer–Cartan elements is

R⟼ead⁡XR−∑j≥0(ad⁡X)j(dX)(j+1)!,X∈g0.

The gauge-path relation, including variable parameters, equals the orbit relation of this action. No assertion that an unspecified deformation problem is governed by an arbitrary L∞-algebra is included.

For the tensor carrier on A[1], this is the fixed-carrier A∞-structure correspondence in the native unsuspended convention, using Unsuspended A∞ identities are tensor codifferentials with explicit suspension signs, including its morphism signs. For the symmetric carrier on V[1], it is the fixed-carrier L∞ correspondence in Shifted coalgebra definition of an L∞-algebra. Both identifications are coefficient-complete and retain every allowed identity-modulo-ideal equivalence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated coefficient-complete deformation data and g=F1l.

[F1]

Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation specifies the fixed carrier, coefficient filtration, coderivations, and allowed coalgebra-automorphism equivalences.

[F2]

Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra proves the complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra of positive-order coderivations and completeness of its ambient endomorphism algebra.

[F3]

Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra proves convergent noncommutative exponential/logarithm identities and conjugation by the exponential of the commutator.

[F4]

Coalgebra automorphisms congruent to the identity are exactly coderivation exponentials identifies every allowed coalgebra automorphism, and not just a subgroup, uniquely with the exponential of a positive-order degree-zero coderivation.

[F5]

The precise shifted L-infinity structure of a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra gives the exact shifted operations q1(sx)=−s(dx), q2(sx,sy)=(−1)∣x∣s[x,y] and identifies their Maurer–Cartan equation.

[F6]

Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements specifies compatible polynomial coefficients, elementary gauge paths, and the equivalence relation generated by their endpoints.

[F7]

Unsuspended A∞ identities are tensor codifferentials with explicit suspension signs proves the exact all-arity tensor suspension identities, including the native A∞ morphisms and coalgebra-map composition.

[F8]

Shifted coalgebra definition of an L∞-algebra fixes the symmetric degree-one square-zero coderivation convention for L∞ structures.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

By Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra, g is a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra. Since D and R have degree one and D2=0, direct expansion gives (D+R)2=DR+RD+R2=dR+[R,R]/2. Thus the displayed assignment is an object bijection, with inverse subtraction of D.

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra

By Coalgebra automorphisms congruent to the identity are exactly coderivation exponentials, every allowed G has the unique form G=exp⁡X with X∈g0. The conjugation identity in Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra gives G(D+R)G−1=ead⁡X(D+R). Since [X,D]=−dX, subtracting D gives precisely the displayed action. Each term has increasing coefficient order. Conjugation preserves coderivations, their square-zero condition, and reduction to D, so this is an action on the object set. The group law is composition, transported through exp and log; no unproved BCH construction is needed.

2.2F5F6step 1.1algebra

Let s:g→g[1] have degree −1. The shift lemma in the statement has q1(sx)=−s(dx) and q2(sx,sy)=(−1)∣x∣s[x,y], with no higher operations. Hence the shifted curvature at sR is −s(dR+[R,R]/2), and its gauge vector with parameter sξ is s(−dξ+[ξ,R]). Therefore the exact path equation of Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements is R′=−dξ+[ξ,R] for compatible polynomial coefficients R(t) and ξ(t), with ξ(t)∈g0[t]∧=lim←⁡n(g0/Fng0)⊗k[t]. The scalar variable has degree zero, and algebraic integration divides tj by j+1 in the usual way.

2.3F2step 1.1construct

Fix any such variable parameter ξ(t) and work in the complete degree-zero algebra and write E0[t]∧=lim←⁡n(E0/(FnE)0)⊗k[t]. Starting at U0=V0=id⁡, iterate Ua+1(t)=id⁡+∫0tξ(u)Ua(u) du and Va+1(t)=id⁡−∫0tVa(u)ξ(u) du. Multiplication by ξ raises coefficient order by one, so successive differences have order at least a+1. Every quotient consequently stabilizes after finitely many iterations as a polynomial. Completeness of E0 gives unique solutions U′=ξU, V′=−Vξ, U(0)=V(0)=id⁡. Uniqueness follows from the same integral equation: a difference in Fa must lie in Fa+1, and the filtration is separated.

3.1step 2.3algebra

Differentiating gives (VU)′=−VξU+VξU=0, and its initial value is the identity, so VU=id⁡. Similarly Z=UV−id⁡ satisfies Z′=ξZ−Zξ and Z(0)=0. Its integral equation is in degree zero, raises coefficient order and forces Z into every Fa, so UV=id⁡. Thus V=U−1 as completed polynomial endomorphisms.

4.1F1step 2.3step 3.1algebra

In the completed tensor target put H=ΔU−(U⊗U)Δ. The coderivation equation for ξ and the product rule give H′=(ξ⊗1+1⊗ξ)H and H(0)=0. Its integral equation forces successive coefficient orders and hence H=0. The same argument applied to U(1C)−1C gives zero, using ξ(1C)=0; and (ϵU)′=ϵξU=0 gives ϵU=ϵ. Together with step 3.1 these prove that U(t), and in particular U(1), is an actual continuous coaugmented counital coalgebra automorphism congruent to the identity modulo I. All equations are quotientwise polynomial equations, not analytic-time claims.

5.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1step 4.1algebra

For an initial degree-one deformation K0=D+R0, set K(t)=U(t)K0V(t). Differentiation gives K′=[ξ,K], and K(0)=K0. Consequently R(t)=K(t)−D satisfies R′=−dξ+[ξ,R], and K(t)2=UK02V=0. Any other completed polynomial solution with the same parameter and initial value differs by Z′=[ξ,Z], Z(0)=0, whose degree-one integral equation raises order and forces Z=0 by separatedness of E1. Every elementary shifted gauge path is therefore this actual conjugation path for its own parameter and initial value. Its endpoints are conjugate by the allowed automorphism U(1), and any finite chain of such paths remains conjugate by composition.

6.1F4step 2.1step 2.2step 5.1construct

Conversely suppose an allowed G carries D+R0 to D+R1. Step 2.1 gives X=log⁡G∈g0. Set U(t)=exp⁡(tX); its series is polynomial modulo each coefficient order, and step 2.1's coalgebra exponential theorem applies coefficientwise in t. The path U(t)(D+R0)U(t)−1−D has parameter ξ(t)=X, is Maurer–Cartan for every t, and joins R0 to R1. Step 2.2 identifies it as an elementary shifted gauge path. Thus every allowed equivalence lies in the gauge relation.

7.1step 1.1step 2.1step 5.1step 6.1

Step 5.1 proves gauge-equivalent elements give equivalent deformations, and step 6.1 proves the converse. Combining this equivalence of relations with the object bijection in step 1.1 proves the claimed bijection on quotient classes, with the full equivalence group and displayed action of step 2.1.

8.1F1F7F8step 7.1algebra∎

For the tensor carrier, work first at each coefficient quotient Kn=B/In, on Mn=A⊗kKn and its tensor coalgebra; its length-r component is Mn⊗Knr≅A⊗kr⊗kKn. The suspension and desuspension maps extend Kn-linearly, and the sign calculations in [F7] use only the grading, tensor Koszul signs, and multilinear composition; they use no division or other field-specific operation. They therefore apply to arbitrary Kn-multilinear Taylor maps, not only scalar extensions of maps over k. The same calculation identifies every positive-arity coderivation with the native unsuspended A∞ operations and every coaugmentation- and counit-preserving coalgebra map with the native A∞ morphism, including its composition signs. A filtration-preserving continuous B-linear map on the coefficient completion induces compatible Kn-linear maps on these quotients; conversely, every compatible family of Kn-linear quotient maps defines a filtration-preserving continuous B-linear map on the inverse limit. Hence the quotientwise correspondences pass to all continuous completed operations and maps. Reduction to the fixed structure and to the identity is unchanged by the invertible suspension signs. For the symmetric carrier, [F8] is exactly the degree-one coderivation definition; adjoining the coaugmentation and extending a coderivation by zero on it preserves its equation. Its finite unshuffle formulas extend through the coefficient quotients, with all integer denominators invertible over the characteristic-zero base. Thus the objects and full equivalences in step 7.1 are precisely the two asserted fixed-carrier homotopy-algebra deformation problems in their stated conventions.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Fixed-unit associative deformations are normalized coderivation Maurer–Cartan classes

Statement

Let (A,μ,e) be any unital associative k-algebra concentrated in degree zero, with no finite-dimensionality hypothesis. Let B,I satisfy Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation, put M=lim←⁡nA⊗kB/In, and take C=Tc(A[1]). Let s:A→A[1] have degree −1. The binary Taylor map

bμ(sa,sb)=sμ(a,b)

extends to a degree-one square-zero coderivation D of CB. Let n⊆l be the coderivations whose Taylor maps vanish whenever one unsuspended argument is e. Then (F1n,[D,−],[−,−]) is a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra.

Its Maurer–Cartan elements are exactly the continuous B-bilinear associative products μ+α on M, reducing to μ modulo I, with the same specified unit e. Its gauge classes are exactly their classes under all continuous B-linear changes of variables g≡id⁡(modI) satisfying g(e)=e, acting by

m′(a,b)=g(m(g−1a,g−1b)).

For a characteristic-zero field k, taking B=k[ ⁣[h] ⁣] and I=(h) includes the formal products a⋆b=ab+∑j≥1hjBj(a,b) with k-bilinear Bj satisfying Bj(e,a)=Bj(a,e)=0. The direct correspondence between these products and associative products, modulo strict unit-preserving changes of variables, also holds over any field; its identification with differential graded Lie Maurer–Cartan and gauge classes here requires characteristic zero. When k=R and (A,μ) is commutative, these are precisely the deformations of Coefficientwise formal associative deformations with the same fixed unit. No commutativity is required of the deformed products in the general theorem.

The exact extension to a graded product of degree zero, with the same cohomological suspension, is bμ(sa,sb)=(−1)∣a∣sμ(a,b). The statement about strict product classes above concerns ordinary degree-zero A; for graded A higher Taylor components can have degree zero and strict changes of variables require the unary subgroup.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unital associative algebra, coefficient-complete carrier, and specified unit in the statement.

[F1]

Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation specifies the coefficient-completed tensor carrier, completed tensor powers, continuous coderivations, and allowed equivalences.

[F2]

Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra proves commutator closure, the differential identities for square-zero D, and completeness of closed filtered coderivation subspaces.

[F3]

Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra proves the inverse convergent noncommutative exponential/logarithm series and conjugation formula.

[F4]

Coalgebra automorphisms congruent to the identity are exactly coderivation exponentials proves that exponentiating a positive-order degree-zero coderivation gives a coalgebra automorphism and that all allowed automorphisms have coderivation logarithms.

[F5]

Maurer–Cartan classes classify fixed-carrier codifferential deformations proves the complete variable-parameter gauge-flow/conjugation correspondence in both directions.

[F6]

Coefficientwise formal associative deformations specifies formal associative products only for a commutative unital real algebra, using real-bilinear coefficient maps and coefficientwise fixed-unit normalization.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

Put VB=lim←⁡n(A[1]⊗kB/In) and VB⊗^r=lim←⁡n((A[1])⊗r⊗kB/In). A continuous homogeneous positive-arity Taylor map f:VB⊗^r→VB of degree u extends by inserting f in every consecutive block of a word, with sign (−1)u(∣v1∣+⋯+∣vi−1∣) for a block starting at i. Each word has only finitely many such blocks. Splitting the output word shows the coderivation equation: the replaced block lies entirely on one side of a coproduct split, and its insertion sign agrees with that side's graded tensor action. Thus these formulas define the coderivation and extend continuously through coefficient completion. Conversely, applying the iterated reduced coproduct and projecting every factor to length one expresses the length-j component of a coderivation as the sum with its length-one projection on one of the j input factors. Its other components are the untouched factors. This follows by iterating the coderivation equation. It determines every length component uniquely, and proves there is no output of length greater than the input length because all j factors must be nonempty. The argument holds at each coefficient quotient and then in the limit. Thus these Taylor maps give every coaugmented counital coderivation uniquely.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

For clarity first allow graded A and a degree-zero product. With ∣sa∣=∣a∣−1, the binary map bμ(sa,sb)=(−1)∣a∣sμ(a,b) has degree one and equals −sμ(s−1⊗s−1), since the tensor-map sign on (sa,sb) is (−1)∣a∣−1. Its insertion extension from step 1.1 is therefore precisely fixed, including signs. Its square is a coderivation because bμ2=[bμ,bμ]/2 and coderivations are closed under graded commutators by Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra. Its only possibly nonzero Taylor projection has arity three and is (−1)∣b∣s(μ(μ(a,b),c)−μ(a,μ(b,c))). Indeed the first association has sign (−1)∣a∣+∣a∣+∣b∣, and the second has sign (−1)∣a∣−1+∣b∣+∣a∣. Thus its square is zero exactly when the product is associative.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Return to degree-zero A, so A[1] has degree −1 and the displayed binary sign is +1. A Taylor map of degree u from arity r to length one can be nonzero only when −r+u=−1, namely u=r−1. Thus every degree-one coderivation is binary and every degree-zero coderivation is unary. Step 2.1 proves that D=bμ is square-zero, and the same computation proves that a degree-one R=bα satisfies (D+R)2=0 exactly when μ+α is associative. A continuous bilinear map is understood on M⊗^BM=lim←⁡n(A⊗2⊗kB/In); the condition R∈F1 says its coefficient image lies in F1M. No naive algebraic tensor of a Hom space with I is used.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1algebra

For an ordinary r-cochain f, denote the Taylor coderivation with projection qf(sa1⊗⋯⊗sar)=sf(a1,…,ar) by qf; it has degree r−1. Call f normalized when any argument e makes it zero. A Taylor insertion contributing to qfqg has the form f(a1,…,g(ai,…,ai+t−1),…,ar+t−1), up to its specified sign. If a unit argument lies inside the inserted block, g vanishes; if outside, a remaining argument of f is the unit and f vanishes. Thus every insertion of normalized cochains is normalized separately, and so are their commutators. Evaluation with any input fixed to e is a closed continuous condition. Hence n is a closed graded Lie subalgebra with the inherited additive filtration bound.

4.2step 1.1step 3.1algebra

A degree-zero coalgebra map G on this carrier is determined by its length-one projection, and that projection can be nonzero only on arity one, since all inputs of arity r have degree −r and B has degree zero. To justify the determination explicitly, apply the iterated coproduct of G and project its j outputs to length one; the resulting length-j component is the j-fold tensor of the length-one projection applied to the iterated coproduct of the input. Coaugmentation and counit fix the length-zero part. Hence G=Tc(g) for the unary map g:M→M; it is an allowed automorphism exactly when g is continuous, invertible, and congruent to the identity modulo I. Conversely that tensor extension is a coalgebra automorphism by deconcatenation, with inverse Tc(g−1).

5.1step 1.1step 4.1algebra

Although bμ is not normalized, its commutator preserves normalization. Write the usual Hochschild differential as (δμf)(a1,…,ar+1)=a1f(a2,…,ar+1)+∑i=1r(−1)if(a1,…,aiai+1,…,ar+1)+(−1)r+1f(a1,…,ar)ar+1. The insertion convention gives exactly π1[bμ,qf](sa1,…,sar+1)=(−1)r−1s(δμf)(a1,…,ar+1). Indeed the left outer product has coefficient (−1)r−1, from moving qf past sa1; the right outer product has coefficient +1; and the i-th adjacent multiplication term in −(−1)r−1qfbμ has coefficient (−1)r+i−1. These are exactly the asserted common sign times the Hochschild coefficients.

5.2F3F4step 4.2algebra

A degree-zero X∈F1n is qξ for a continuous unary ξ with ξ(e)=0. Since ξj(e)=0 for all j≥1, g=exp⁡ξ fixes e. Conversely if g≡id⁡(modI) fixes e, then (g−id⁡)(e)=0 and every positive power does too, so log⁡(g)(e)=0. Both series converge by Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra, applied to the unary complete endomorphism algebra or to length one in CB. Also exp⁡(qξ)=Tc(exp⁡ξ): the left side is a coalgebra map by Coalgebra automorphisms congruent to the identity are exactly coderivation exponentials, has unary projection exp⁡ξ, and is determined by that projection by step 4.2. Applying the inverse logarithm proves log⁡(Tc(g))=qlog⁡(g). Consequently exponentials of F1n0 give exactly all the required unit-preserving changes of variables, including the reverse implication that exp⁡ξ(e)=e forces ξ(e)=0.

6.1F2step 4.1step 5.1algebra

If the unit occurs at an interior position 2≤j≤r, the adjacent multiplication terms i=j−1 and i=j in δμf have identical remaining arguments and opposite signs; every other term retains the unit inside f and vanishes. If j=1, the first outer product term cancels the i=1 multiplication term, using ef=f. If j=r+1, the i=r multiplication term cancels the last outer product term, using fe=f. In both endpoint cases all remaining terms vanish by normalization. These arguments also include r=1, where only the endpoint cases occur. Thus δμ preserves normalization and [D,n]⊆n. Closedness in step 4.1 and Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra now give a degreewise complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra F1n.

7.1step 2.1step 3.1step 5.1step 6.1algebra

By the direct identity (D+R)2=[D,R]+[R,R]/2 and the preceding binary degree and associativity computations, its Maurer–Cartan elements are exactly associative products μ+α with the specified reduction and with α normalized. Since μ(e,a)=a=μ(a,e), normalization is equivalent to (μ+α)(e,a)=a=(μ+α)(a,e). Conversely any continuous fixed-unit product with this reduction has such a normalized difference α. Hence the claimed object correspondence holds in both directions. In particular at arity two the differential sign is π1[D,bα]=−sδμα, while π1[bα,bα]/2=s(α(α(a,b),c)−α(a,α(b,c))), so its suspended Maurer–Cartan equation is exactly the expanded associator, with no implicit sign convention.

8.1step 7.1step 4.2step 5.2algebra

On binary Taylor projections, conjugation by G=Tc(g) gives bm′ with m′(a,b)=g(m(g−1a,g−1b)). If m has unit e and g(e)=e, then m′(e,a)=a=m′(a,e); reduction modulo I remains μ. Thus the full subgroup just identified acts on exactly the fixed-unit products in step 7.1, by the stated ordinary transport formula.

9.1F5step 6.1step 5.2step 8.1algebra

The gauge and conjugation proof in Maurer–Cartan classes classify fixed-carrier codifferential deformations restricts to this normalized subalgebra. In detail its variable unary parameter ξ(t) satisfies ξ(t)e=0, and its solution g′=ξ(t)g, g(0)=id⁡ has (g(e)−e)′=ξ(t)(g(e)−e) with zero initial value. The same coefficient-order integral induction proves g(e)=e. Hence every normalized gauge path has an actual unit-preserving endpoint automorphism. Conversely any allowed unit-preserving g has normalized log⁡(g) by step 5.2, and exp⁡(tlog⁡(g)) fixes e and gives a normalized gauge path. Therefore normalized gauge equivalence is precisely the entire fixed-unit change-of-variables equivalence, rather than merely the unrestricted codifferential equivalence.

10.1F1F6step 2.1step 3.1step 4.2step 7.1step 8.1step 9.1constructalgebra∎

Finally for B=k[ ⁣[h] ⁣], a continuous coefficient-complete bilinear map is uniquely its sequence of coefficient maps Bj:A⊗A→A: apply it to constant inputs and expand each output in A[ ⁣[h] ⁣], then use k[ ⁣[h] ⁣]-linearity and continuity. Every sequence conversely defines such a map because only finitely many coefficients contribute modulo hn. Reduction fixes the zero coefficient to μ, and normalization is coefficientwise Bj(e,a)=Bj(a,e)=0. In characteristic zero, step 7.1's object bijection and step 9.1's full equivalence correspondence therefore apply to these formal products. When k=R and A is commutative, the coefficients are exactly the real-bilinear maps in [F6], the coefficientwise Cauchy sums are finite at every ℏ-order, and the fixed-unit normalization agrees. This is the stated supplier specialization; no additional condition on the general theorem is imported. The any-field assertion about formal products and strict coordinate changes also has a direct argument independent of the characteristic-zero exponential and logarithm: expanding the consecutive-insertion square of the binary suspended product bm cancels the disjoint insertions in pairs, leaving exactly the signed associator. Thus bm2=0 is equivalent to associativity over every field, including characteristic two, without dividing by 2. The degree argument in step 3.1 and deconcatenation in step 4.2 identify strict degree-zero coalgebra changes with Tc(g), and step 8.1 computes their transport action without integer denominators. These product and strict-coordinate-change assertions therefore extend to any field. Their identification with differential graded Lie Maurer–Cartan and exponential gauge classes retains the characteristic-zero hypothesis of [F1], under which the required halves, factorials and logarithmic denominators are defined.

RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

The general Maurer–Cartan deformation correspondence needs a proved gauge construction

Remarks

The Maurer–Cartan equation defines a solution set. A deformation-class correspondence additionally needs a specified deformation object, its independently defined equivalences, and a proof identifying those equivalences with a gauge construction. The complete filtration proves convergence; it is one part of that correspondence.

This page now supplies filtered L∞ Taylor morphisms and completed polynomial gauge paths, proves that Taylor maps preserve solutions and gauge equivalence, and proves the correspondence for a specified deformation problem: square-zero codifferentials on a fixed coefficient-completed tensor or symmetric coalgebra, modulo continuous coalgebra automorphisms equal to the identity modulo the coefficient ideal. The equivalence is genuine coalgebra conjugacy, defined independently of Maurer–Cartan gauge paths. The noncommutative exponential/logarithm and variable-parameter flow proofs identify all such conjugacies with gauge equivalence. Tensor and symmetric coalgebras give the fixed-carrier A∞ and L∞ versions, respectively.

The strict associative specialization identifies all fixed-unit formal associative products with normalized coderivation Maurer–Cartan elements and all unit-preserving formal changes of variables with the corresponding gauge equivalences. These results specify the deformation objects; they do not attach an unspecified geometric deformation problem to every L∞-algebra. A∞ morphisms remain separately defined in the unsuspended convention, while the L∞ Taylor and gauge constructions use the shifted convention fixed on this page.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources