Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Maurer–Cartan classes classify fixed-carrier codifferential deformations

Statement

Use Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation, and put g=F1l, d=[D,−]. Then

R⟼D+R

is a bijection between {R∈g1:dR+[R,R]/2=0} and all the stated fixed-carrier codifferential deformations. It identifies their equivalence classes by all allowed coalgebra automorphisms with Maurer–Cartan gauge classes of the shifted filtered L∞-algebra of The precise shifted L-infinity structure of a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra, using Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements.

More explicitly, the full allowed group is exp⁡(g0), with group operation inherited from composition, and its action on Maurer–Cartan elements is

R⟼ead⁡XR−∑j≥0(ad⁡X)j(dX)(j+1)!,X∈g0.

The gauge-path relation, including variable parameters, equals the orbit relation of this action. No assertion that an unspecified deformation problem is governed by an arbitrary L∞-algebra is included.

For the tensor carrier on A[1], this is the fixed-carrier A∞-structure correspondence in the native unsuspended convention, using Unsuspended A∞ identities are tensor codifferentials with explicit suspension signs, including its morphism signs. For the symmetric carrier on V[1], it is the fixed-carrier L∞ correspondence in Shifted coalgebra definition of an L∞-algebra. Both identifications are coefficient-complete and retain every allowed identity-modulo-ideal equivalence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated coefficient-complete deformation data and g=F1l.

[F1]

Coefficient-complete fixed-carrier codifferential deformation specifies the fixed carrier, coefficient filtration, coderivations, and allowed coalgebra-automorphism equivalences.

[F2]

Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra proves the complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra of positive-order coderivations and completeness of its ambient endomorphism algebra.

[F3]

Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra proves convergent noncommutative exponential/logarithm identities and conjugation by the exponential of the commutator.

[F4]

Coalgebra automorphisms congruent to the identity are exactly coderivation exponentials identifies every allowed coalgebra automorphism, and not just a subgroup, uniquely with the exponential of a positive-order degree-zero coderivation.

[F5]

The precise shifted L-infinity structure of a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra gives the exact shifted operations q1(sx)=−s(dx), q2(sx,sy)=(−1)∣x∣s[x,y] and identifies their Maurer–Cartan equation.

[F6]

Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements specifies compatible polynomial coefficients, elementary gauge paths, and the equivalence relation generated by their endpoints.

[F7]

Unsuspended A∞ identities are tensor codifferentials with explicit suspension signs proves the exact all-arity tensor suspension identities, including the native A∞ morphisms and coalgebra-map composition.

[F8]

Shifted coalgebra definition of an L∞-algebra fixes the symmetric degree-one square-zero coderivation convention for L∞ structures.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

By Complete coderivations form a filtered differential graded Lie algebra, g is a complete filtered differential graded Lie algebra. Since D and R have degree one and D2=0, direct expansion gives (D+R)2=DR+RD+R2=dR+[R,R]/2. Thus the displayed assignment is an object bijection, with inverse subtraction of D.

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra

By Coalgebra automorphisms congruent to the identity are exactly coderivation exponentials, every allowed G has the unique form G=exp⁡X with X∈g0. The conjugation identity in Exponential and logarithm in a noncommutative complete filtered algebra gives G(D+R)G−1=ead⁡X(D+R). Since [X,D]=−dX, subtracting D gives precisely the displayed action. Each term has increasing coefficient order. Conjugation preserves coderivations, their square-zero condition, and reduction to D, so this is an action on the object set. The group law is composition, transported through exp and log; no unproved BCH construction is needed.

2.2F5F6step 1.1algebra

Let s:g→g[1] have degree −1. The shift lemma in the statement has q1(sx)=−s(dx) and q2(sx,sy)=(−1)∣x∣s[x,y], with no higher operations. Hence the shifted curvature at sR is −s(dR+[R,R]/2), and its gauge vector with parameter sξ is s(−dξ+[ξ,R]). Therefore the exact path equation of Completed polynomial gauge paths for filtered Maurer–Cartan elements is R′=−dξ+[ξ,R] for compatible polynomial coefficients R(t) and ξ(t), with ξ(t)∈g0[t]∧=lim←⁡n(g0/Fng0)⊗k[t]. The scalar variable has degree zero, and algebraic integration divides tj by j+1 in the usual way.

2.3F2step 1.1construct

Fix any such variable parameter ξ(t) and work in the complete degree-zero algebra and write E0[t]∧=lim←⁡n(E0/(FnE)0)⊗k[t]. Starting at U0=V0=id⁡, iterate Ua+1(t)=id⁡+∫0tξ(u)Ua(u) du and Va+1(t)=id⁡−∫0tVa(u)ξ(u) du. Multiplication by ξ raises coefficient order by one, so successive differences have order at least a+1. Every quotient consequently stabilizes after finitely many iterations as a polynomial. Completeness of E0 gives unique solutions U′=ξU, V′=−Vξ, U(0)=V(0)=id⁡. Uniqueness follows from the same integral equation: a difference in Fa must lie in Fa+1, and the filtration is separated.

3.1step 2.3algebra

Differentiating gives (VU)′=−VξU+VξU=0, and its initial value is the identity, so VU=id⁡. Similarly Z=UV−id⁡ satisfies Z′=ξZ−Zξ and Z(0)=0. Its integral equation is in degree zero, raises coefficient order and forces Z into every Fa, so UV=id⁡. Thus V=U−1 as completed polynomial endomorphisms.

4.1F1step 2.3step 3.1algebra

In the completed tensor target put H=ΔU−(U⊗U)Δ. The coderivation equation for ξ and the product rule give H′=(ξ⊗1+1⊗ξ)H and H(0)=0. Its integral equation forces successive coefficient orders and hence H=0. The same argument applied to U(1C)−1C gives zero, using ξ(1C)=0; and (ϵU)′=ϵξU=0 gives ϵU=ϵ. Together with step 3.1 these prove that U(t), and in particular U(1), is an actual continuous coaugmented counital coalgebra automorphism congruent to the identity modulo I. All equations are quotientwise polynomial equations, not analytic-time claims.

5.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1step 4.1algebra

For an initial degree-one deformation K0=D+R0, set K(t)=U(t)K0V(t). Differentiation gives K′=[ξ,K], and K(0)=K0. Consequently R(t)=K(t)−D satisfies R′=−dξ+[ξ,R], and K(t)2=UK02V=0. Any other completed polynomial solution with the same parameter and initial value differs by Z′=[ξ,Z], Z(0)=0, whose degree-one integral equation raises order and forces Z=0 by separatedness of E1. Every elementary shifted gauge path is therefore this actual conjugation path for its own parameter and initial value. Its endpoints are conjugate by the allowed automorphism U(1), and any finite chain of such paths remains conjugate by composition.

6.1F4step 2.1step 2.2step 5.1construct

Conversely suppose an allowed G carries D+R0 to D+R1. Step 2.1 gives X=log⁡G∈g0. Set U(t)=exp⁡(tX); its series is polynomial modulo each coefficient order, and step 2.1's coalgebra exponential theorem applies coefficientwise in t. The path U(t)(D+R0)U(t)−1−D has parameter ξ(t)=X, is Maurer–Cartan for every t, and joins R0 to R1. Step 2.2 identifies it as an elementary shifted gauge path. Thus every allowed equivalence lies in the gauge relation.

7.1step 1.1step 2.1step 5.1step 6.1

Step 5.1 proves gauge-equivalent elements give equivalent deformations, and step 6.1 proves the converse. Combining this equivalence of relations with the object bijection in step 1.1 proves the claimed bijection on quotient classes, with the full equivalence group and displayed action of step 2.1.

8.1F1F7F8step 7.1algebra∎

For the tensor carrier, work first at each coefficient quotient Kn=B/In, on Mn=A⊗kKn and its tensor coalgebra; its length-r component is Mn⊗Knr≅A⊗kr⊗kKn. The suspension and desuspension maps extend Kn-linearly, and the sign calculations in [F7] use only the grading, tensor Koszul signs, and multilinear composition; they use no division or other field-specific operation. They therefore apply to arbitrary Kn-multilinear Taylor maps, not only scalar extensions of maps over k. The same calculation identifies every positive-arity coderivation with the native unsuspended A∞ operations and every coaugmentation- and counit-preserving coalgebra map with the native A∞ morphism, including its composition signs. A filtration-preserving continuous B-linear map on the coefficient completion induces compatible Kn-linear maps on these quotients; conversely, every compatible family of Kn-linear quotient maps defines a filtration-preserving continuous B-linear map on the inverse limit. Hence the quotientwise correspondences pass to all continuous completed operations and maps. Reduction to the fixed structure and to the identity is unchanged by the invertible suspension signs. For the symmetric carrier, [F8] is exactly the degree-one coderivation definition; adjoining the coaugmentation and extending a coderivation by zero on it preserves its equation. Its finite unshuffle formulas extend through the coefficient quotients, with all integer denominators invertible over the characteristic-zero base. Thus the objects and full equivalences in step 7.1 are precisely the two asserted fixed-carrier homotopy-algebra deformation problems in their stated conventions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources