Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fresnel series geometric tail bounds

Statement

For the terms ck of C and sk of S in Fresnel, error, and Gauss hypergeometric series,

∣ck+1∣∣ck∣≤π2∣z∣4/4(2k+1)(2k+2),∣sk+1∣∣sk∣≤π2∣z∣4/4(2k+2)(2k+3).

Each displayed quotient is asserted only when its denominator is nonzero. At z=0, every ck=sk=0, so both series and every tail are zero. The corresponding division-free inequalities obtained by multiplying by ∣ck∣ or ∣sk∣ hold for every z.

Once the applicable bound is at most q<1 for all terms after a first omitted term, the absolute tail is bounded by that term divided by 1−q. Both series converge locally uniformly on C. For every piecewise-C1 path γ:[0,1]→C with γ(0)=0 and γ(1)=z, they equal C(z)=∫γcos⁡(πt2/2) dt,S(z)=∫γsin⁡(πt2/2) dt, where the complex line integral is defined by The complex line integral over a rectifiable path as a componentwise Riemann–Stieltjes integral. In particular, these integrals are path-independent and agree with the straight-segment integrals.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The series definitions of C,S in Fresnel, error, and Gauss hypergeometric series.

[F1]

Fresnel, error, and Gauss hypergeometric series: ck=(−1)k(π/2)2kz4k+1/((2k)!(4k+1)) and sk=(−1)k(π/2)2k+1z4k+3/((2k+1)!(4k+3)).

[F5]

The complex line integral over a rectifiable path as a componentwise Riemann–Stieltjes integral: for a continuous integrand on a rectifiable path, the complex line integral is defined by its four componentwise real Riemann--Stieltjes integrals.

[F6]

For piecewise-C1 contours the Riemann–Stieltjes integral agrees with the parametric complex integral and the published real line integrals: on a piecewise-C1 path, the line integral equals the sum of the parameter integrals of f(γ(s))γ′(s) over its smooth pieces.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

If z=0, all terms in [F1] vanish, and their division-free bounds and zero tails hold directly. For z≠0, every term is nonzero, and taking ratios in [F1] gives ∣ck+1∣∣ck∣=π2∣z∣444k+1(2k+1)(2k+2)(4k+5),∣sk+1∣∣sk∣=π2∣z∣444k+3(2k+2)(2k+3)(4k+7). The omitted factors are each less than 1, yielding the displayed bounds.

2.1step 1.1algebra

The denominators in the bounds grow quadratically in k, so the ratios tend to zero; summing the resulting geometric majorant gives the stated tail bound and uniform convergence on every disk.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1algebra

The infinite-radius power series in [F1] may be differentiated termwise by [F3]. The resulting derivatives are C′(z)=∑k=0∞(−1)k(π/2)2kz4k(2k)!=cos⁡(πz2/2),S′(z)=∑k=0∞(−1)k(π/2)2k+1z4k+2(2k+1)!=sin⁡(πz2/2), where the last equalities use [F2].

4.1F4F5F6step 3.1algebra∎

Both C and S are entire primitives of their displayed integrands. For any piecewise-C1 path γ:[0,1]→C from 0 to z, put ηh=γ(s+h)−γ(s) on each smooth piece. Complex differentiability gives C(γ(s)+ηh)−C(γ(s))=C′(γ(s))ηh+ηhϵC(ηh) with ϵC(η)→0 as η→0; set ϵC(0)=0. Since ηh/h→γ′(s), division by h makes the remainder tend to zero and proves (C∘γ)′(s)=C′(γ(s))γ′(s). The same argument gives (S∘γ)′(s)=S′(γ(s))γ′(s). At each piece endpoint the same limit with one-sided increments gives the relative derivatives; they extend continuously to the closed piece. By [F4], the real and imaginary parts integrate to endpoint differences. By [F6], the parameter integrals sum to the complex line integrals defined in [F5]. Since C(0)=S(0)=0, the line integrals equal C(z) and S(z). Hence they are path-independent and agree with the straight-segment integrals.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Fresnel, error, and Gauss hypergeometric series.

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources