Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Generic complex algebraic Whitney regularity

Statement

Assume AC. Let S,Y⊆Cn be disjoint irreducible smooth locally closed complex algebraic varieties with Y⊆S‾ and dim⁡Y<dim⁡S. There is a proper closed algebraic subset E⊊Y such that (S,Y) satisfies Whitney (a) and (b) at every point of Y∖E. Finite prescribed incident upper strata can be treated with one common exceptional subset by taking a finite union. The same result holds in the affine charts of a quasi-projective algebraic ambient manifold.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, smooth irreducible disjoint locally closed S,Y⊆Cn with Y⊆S‾ and dim⁡Y<dim⁡S.

[F1]

Whitney (a) and (b) for an incident pair are the conditions of Finite complex algebraic Whitney stratification and control data: limits of tangent planes and of real secant lines through points of the lower stratum are compared inside a complex tangent plane, and both conditions are required.

[F2]

A dominant morphism between irreducible classical varieties has nonempty fibres of pure dimension dim⁡X−dim⁡Y over a dense open subset of the target (Fibres have pure expected dimension over a dense open).

[F3]

A point of a positive-dimensional irreducible complex variety can be reached by a normalized holomorphic arc whose punctured part lies in any prescribed nonempty Zariski open subset (Complex algebraic boundary points admit normalized curve arcs).

[F4]

Closed algebraic subsets of a classical variety have finitely many irreducible components, and every proper closed subvariety of an irreducible variety has strictly smaller dimension; a finite union of closed subsets has dimension the maximum of the dimensions of its components (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions, Nonempty opens preserve irreducible dimension).

[F5]

For X=Spec⁡(C[t1,…,tm]/I) the tangent space at a C-point is the kernel of the Jacobian of any finite generating list of I (The Jacobian kernel computes the tangent space); Grassmannian matrix charts and their transition maps are algebraic regular maps (Standard affine charts on the Grassmannian). A smooth complex algebraic variety is locally standard smooth, so it admits near each point a standard smooth presentation with n≥c≥0 whose defining equations have an invertible Jacobian minor and the holomorphic implicit function theorem exhibits the variety as a holomorphic graph over its tangent coordinates (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps, The holomorphic implicit function theorem, Regular equals smooth over a perfect field); consequently the algebraic tangent plane of that graph is also the analytic tangent space, and the derivative of any holomorphic arc lying in the variety lies in it.

[F6]

Products of irreducible classical varieties over C are irreducible. For affine factors A,B, let D(f),D(g) be two nonempty principal opens of A×B. Choose (af,bf) where f is nonzero and (ag,bg) where g is nonzero. The nonempty opens D(f(−,bf)) and D(g(−,bg)) of A meet at some a. Then D(f(a,−)) and D(g(a,−)) meet in B, giving a point of D(f)∩D(g). Principal opens form a basis on the affine product, so it is irreducible. Product affine charts cover the general product; their overlaps are nonempty opens, hence dense in each chart, and the same intersection argument proves irreducibility globally. Also Gr⁡(d,n) and Pn−1 are irreducible: their standard affine charts are irreducible affine spaces with nonempty open overlaps, so any two nonempty opens meet by passing through an overlap (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties, Standard affine charts on the Grassmannian).

[A1]

AC is inherited from the fiber-dimension, curve-arc and Jacobian suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F4F5F6A1construct

Put d=dim⁡S and let G be the graph of the map (x,y)↦(TxS,[x−y]) from S×Y to Gr⁡(d,n)×Pn−1; it is algebraic by [F5], because on chart domains the tangent plane is the kernel of the Jacobian matrix of local equations, whose basis entries are regular ratios on each fixed nonzero-minor chart and the secant coordinates are regular since x≠y. Let Z be the reduced closure of G in S‾×Y×Gr⁡(d,n)×Pn−1. The graph G is isomorphic to S×Y, hence irreducible by [F6], and S‾, Y, Gr⁡(d,n) and Pn−1 are irreducible; the ambient product is therefore irreducible by [F6], and its closed subset Z, the closure of the irreducible G, is irreducible as well. Let B=Z∖G, a proper closed subset, and let g:Z→Y be the projection; it is dominant because it is onto on G.

2.1F2F4A1step 1.1algebra

Apply [F2] to g to obtain a dense open subset of Y over which the fibres Zy are nonempty and pure of dimension r=dim⁡Z−dim⁡Y. This number is positive, because each fibre contains Gy={(x,y,TxS,[x−y]):x∈S}≅S of dimension dim⁡S≥1. Each irreducible component Bi of the proper closed subset B has dim⁡Bi<dim⁡Z by [F4]; if Bi→Y is dominant, [F2] gives a further dense open of Y over which its fibres have pure dimension dim⁡Bi−dim⁡Y≤r−1, and if it is not dominant we remove its image closure. Intersecting the finitely many dense opens leaves a dense open Y0⊆Y on which Zy is pure r-dimensional while By has dimension at most r−1; hence no irreducible component of Zy is contained in By, and for every component V of Zy the set V∩Gy=V∖By is a nonempty dense open subset of the irreducible V.

3.1F3A1step 2.1construct

Fix y∈Y0 and an incidence point z0=(y,y,T,[u])∈Zy with u≠0. Let V be an irreducible component of Zy containing z0 and let γ be the holomorphic arc supplied by [F3] for the variety V, the nonempty Zariski open V∖By and the point z0. Since γ maps into Zy and Zy⊆g−1(y), its second coordinate is the constant y; write γ(s)=(x(s),y,T(s),[u(s)]) with γ(0)=z0 and γ(s)∈G for s≠0. Then T(s)=Tx(s)S and [u(s)]=[x(s)−y] for s≠0, so x(s)≠y for s≠0. Choosing a projective chart containing [u], the normalized representative of the arc is holomorphic, and since x(s)−y is not identically zero some coordinate has finite positive vanishing order; with m≥1 the minimum of these orders, x(s)−y=smv(s) with v holomorphic and v(0)≠0, and [v(0)]=[u].

4.1F5A1step 3.1algebra

Let p0 be a complex covector annihilating the complex plane T. In a Grassmannian matrix chart around T write T(s) as the graph of a holomorphic matrix A(s) with A(0)=A0, possible for small s because T(s)→T; every annihilator of the graph of A(s) has the form q(s)=(−A(s)tb,b) for b∈(Cn−d)∗, and b can be chosen with (−A0tb,b)=p0 because p0 annihilates T. The resulting q(s) is holomorphic and annihilates each T(s). Since x(s)∈S for s≠0, its derivative lies in Tx(s)S=T(s) by [F5], so q(s)(x′(s))=0 for s≠0. Differentiating x(s)−y=smv(s) gives x′(s)=sm−1(mv(s)+sv′(s)), and dividing by sm−1 and letting s→0 yields p0(mv(0))=0, hence p0(v(0))=0. Every annihilator of T therefore kills v(0), so v(0)∈T and the limiting complex secant line [u] lies in T.

5.1F1step 3.1step 4.1

Now let xj∈S and yj∈Y be sequences converging to the same point y∈Y0, with tangent planes TxjS converging to a plane T and real secant lines through xj,yj converging to a real line ℓ. After choosing their signs, the secant directions normalized to unit vectors converge to a unit vector w spanning ℓ, and the complex projective points [xj−yj]=[wj] converge to [w], the complex line spanned by ℓ; moreover (xj,yj,TxjS,[xj−yj])∈G⊆Z converges to (y,y,T,[w])∈Zy because Z is closed. Applying steps 3.1 and 4.1 to this incidence point shows that its limiting complex secant line lies in T, so w∈T and ℓ=Rw⊆T. This is Whitney (b) at y in the full moving-point form.

6.1F1step 5.1construct

For Whitney (a) at y, let xj∈S converge to y with tangent planes converging to T, and let w∈TyY be a nonzero real tangent vector (the zero vector already belongs to T). In a holomorphic chart of the smooth manifold Y near y choose points yj∈Y of the form y+ϵjw+o(ϵj) with ϵj>0, ϵj→0 and ∥xj−y∥/ϵj→0, for instance ϵj=∥xj−y∥ and a straight segment in the chart. Then ∥xj−yj∥≥ϵj∥w∥/2 for large j, and the secant directions from yj to xj converge to the real line spanned by w. Since the tangent planes TxjS→T, Whitney (b) from step 5.1 places that real line in T, so w∈T. Every real tangent vector of TyY arises in this way, so TyY⊆T, proving Whitney (a).

7.1F4step 2.1step 5.1step 6.1∎

Set E=Y∖Y0; it is a proper closed algebraic subset by step 2.1, and steps 5.1 and 6.1 show that (S,Y) satisfies (a) and (b) at every point of Y∖E. For finitely many prescribed incident upper strata S1,…,Sm over the same irreducible Y, apply the construction to each and take the union of the finitely many proper closed exceptional sets; since Y is irreducible, that finite union is still proper, by [F4]. For a quasi-projective ambient manifold, use the finitely many affine ambient charts Uα that meet Y; their intersections with the irreducible Y are nonempty opens. Inside each chart apply the affine result to every pair of irreducible components (Si,Yj) of (S∩Uα,Y∩Uα) with Yj⊆Si‾ and dim⁡Yj<dim⁡Si, and for each point of an irreducible component of Y∩Uα one of these pairs accounts for every sequence in S converging to it after passing to a subsequence in a component. Each chart exceptional set is closed in Y∩Uα and has smaller dimension than Y, so its closure in Y is proper by [F4]. The union of these finitely many closures and the proper closed complements Y∖Uα is still proper because Y is irreducible. Outside this union every chart argument applies, giving the required closed E⊊Y.

Remarks

  • The decisive passage is step 4.1: differentiability of an arbitrary radial curve alone does not prove Whitney (b), because the limiting tangent plane must be recovered from generic fibre purity of the full moving-secant incidence closure. The cited Whitney article identifies the established theorem; the proof above is the local algebraic construction, and the fixed-lower-point arc is supplied by Complex algebraic boundary points admit normalized curve arcs.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources