Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex algebraic varieties and maps admit compatible finite stratifications

Statement

Assume AC. Let f:X→Y be one morphism of reduced quasi-projective complex algebraic varieties, and prescribe finitely many closed or locally closed algebraic subsets in source and target. There exist finite smooth complex algebraic Whitney (a),(b) stratifications with frontier on X and Y respecting all prescribed subsets, such that each source stratum maps surjectively and smoothly onto one target stratum. A further finite algebraic stratification may be prescribed and refined. The analytic strata are smooth complex manifolds and the restrictions are smooth submersions. If f is proper in the analytic topology, in particular if it is a projective algebraic morphism, the whole restriction f−1(T)→T over any target stratum is proper; no restriction of f to a nonclosed individual source stratum is asserted proper.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, reduced quasi-projective complex algebraic varieties X,Y, one morphism f:X→Y, and finite prescribed families of closed or locally closed algebraic subsets of X and of Y.

[F1]

Smooth frontier strata and the Whitney (a),(b) conditions for an incident pair are those of Finite complex algebraic Whitney stratification and control data.

[F2]

Finite smooth frontier partitions respecting finite families of closed subsets exist by the dimension-decreasing construction of Complex algebraic morphisms admit compatible finite smooth stratifications, whose source-partition proof uses the finite component decomposition, the strict dimension drop of proper closed subvarieties and the density of the regular locus (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions, Nonempty opens preserve irreducible dimension, Dense regular loci on every component, Regular equals smooth over a perfect field).

[F3]

Given a smooth irreducible lower stratum and finitely many incident smooth upper strata inside an algebraic variety, a dense open subset of the lower stratum satisfies both Whitney conditions with every one of them (Generic complex algebraic Whitney regularity).

[F4]

A morphism from a smooth irreducible variety to an irreducible target over C is smooth over a dense open subset of the target; if it is dominant, that open may be shrunk to lie in the image (Generic smoothness over a dense target open).

[F5]

Smooth complex algebraic strata carry holomorphic analytic charts, by the locally standard smooth presentation and the holomorphic implicit function theorem, exactly as in the analytic paragraph of Complex algebraic morphisms admit compatible finite smooth stratifications (The holomorphic implicit function theorem).

[F7]

Every smooth irreducible finite-type complex algebraic piece is analytically connected, and its analytic closure agrees with its Zariski closure (Irreducible complex varieties are analytically connected); this is the connectedness and frontier comparison needed by [F1].

[A1]

AC is inherited from the fiber-dimension, Whitney-regularity, connectedness and chart suppliers above and is used only through them (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3A1construct

Replace every prescribed locally closed subset A by the two prescribed closed subsets A‾ and A‾∖A; their difference recovers A, and it suffices to respect the resulting finite list of closed subsets. Refine the smooth-partition construction of [F2] to construct, for a closed residual variety R together with a finite list of prescribed closed subsets and finitely many previously fixed smooth strata outside R whose closures must be respected, a Whitney partition of R compatible with all of them: take the irreducible components Ri of R, remove their nonsmooth loci and their intersections with the other components, and remove every prescribed closed subset not containing Ri, obtaining dense smooth opens Li; then for every previously fixed upper stratum S, remove Ri∩S‾ when Ri⊈S‾, and when Ri⊆S‾ use [F3] to remove the closure in Ri of the exceptional subset of [F3], which is proper because it has dimension smaller than dim⁡Ri. Finitely many upper strata leave nonempty dense smooth opens Ui⊆Ri, and [F3] makes each Ui Whitney-regular with every incident previously fixed upper stratum.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1construct

Emit the Ui as strata, add their closures Ri to the list of closed subsets to be respected, and recurse on the closed complement R∖⋃iUi, whose dimension drops because every component lost a dense open subset. The recursion terminates by induction on dimension, producing a finite partition of R into smooth irreducible locally closed strata. Strata of the same round have no frontier relation, since each Ui misses all other components Rj. Every pair of incident strata has its upper stratum emitted earlier, and when the lower stratum was emitted step 1.1 imposed Whitney (a) and (b) with that upper stratum; boundaries have strictly smaller dimension by [F2]. The respected closures make every stratum closure a union of strata. In a quasi-projective ambient space, cover it by finitely many affine coordinate charts and apply the affine-chart version of [F3]; a sequence in R converging to a point meets only finitely many components of the chart intersections, so passing to a subsequence in one component reduces the conditions to the chart version. Thus Whitney partitions compatible with a finite list of closed sets and with fixed external upper strata exist.

3.1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1construct

Construct the map-compatible partitions by decreasing target residual dimension. Start with target residual R=Y and source residual f−1(R)=X, and at each later round maintain the original closed-set lists together with the closures of all previously emitted source and target strata. Partition the source residual f−1(R) by step 2.1, so that it is Whitney-compatible with all previously emitted source strata. For each irreducible component Ri of R, choose a dense smooth open Li⊆Ri as in step 1.1, respecting the target prescriptions and Whitney-regular with all previously emitted target strata. For every new source stratum Zα compute the closure of its image in R; if that closure is not Ri, remove its intersection with Ri, a proper closed subset; if the closure is Ri, then Zα→Ri is dominant and [F4] supplies a dense open subset of Ri on which the restriction is smooth and onto. Intersecting the finitely many resulting dense opens with Li gives a nonempty dense open Vi⊆Ri.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 3.1algebra

Emit the Vi as target strata and the nonempty pieces Zα∩f−1(Vi) as source strata. Each such piece is open in the smooth irreducible stratum Zα, hence smooth irreducible and locally closed, and it is Whitney-regular with every incident previously fixed upper source stratum, because Whitney conditions are local and were imposed on all of Zα in step 2.1; with the pieces of the same round it has no frontier relation except through closures, which the later rounds make unions of strata because every closure is added to the respected list. Each piece maps smoothly and onto Vi by its selection in step 3.1, and target strata are Whitney-regular with earlier target strata since Vi⊆Li. Source frontier relations inside f−1(⋃iVi) are inherited from the source partition, and a stratum closure over Ri misses every Vj with j≠i.

5.1F1F2F3F7step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1construct

Remove ⋃iVi from R, restrict both residuals and both lists, add all newly emitted stratum closures to the respective lists, and repeat. The target dimension strictly decreases each round, so after finitely many rounds every target point and every source point has been placed: a source point lies over one emitted target stratum and is contained in one emitted piece. Future source partitions are chosen Whitney-compatible with every earlier source stratum by step 2.1, and future target opens are chosen Whitney-compatible with earlier target strata in step 3.1, so every incident pair is covered; the closure-bookkeeping makes all stratum closures unions of strata. Each emitted piece is irreducible and nonempty, so [F7] makes it analytically connected and identifies its analytic closure with the algebraic closure tracked by the construction. This yields finite smooth Whitney frontier stratifications of X and Y, respecting all prescribed subsets (including the strata of any prescribed finite algebraic stratification, which were treated as prescribed sets in step 1.1), with each source stratum mapping smoothly and surjectively onto one target stratum.

6.1F5A1step 5.1given

The analytic clauses follow from [F5] and the same locally standard smooth Jacobian charts: the strata are smooth complex manifolds, and each smooth restriction is, in those charts, a holomorphic map whose differential is onto and whose rank is locally constant, hence a submersion. If f is proper in the analytic topology and T is a target stratum, then for every compact subset C⊆T the inclusion T↪Y is continuous, so C is compact in Y, and f−1(C)⊆f−1(T) is compact by properness of f; hence the restriction f−1(T)→T is proper, although individual source strata inside f−1(T) may fail to be closed. Empty spaces and empty prescribed families add no strata, and no tube control, isotopy or triangulation existence is claimed.

7.1F6step 6.1algebra∎

For the projective case factor f as a closed algebraic embedding i:X↪Y×PN(C) followed by the projection π:Y×PN(C)→Y. Complex projective space is the continuous image of the unit sphere in CN+1 under z↦[z], hence compact by [F6]. A closed algebraic embedding is analytically closed, because in each chart its defining polynomial equations have continuous coefficients and their common zero set is closed. For a compact C⊆Y the set π−1(C)=C×PN(C) is compact by [F6], and f−1(C)=i−1(C×PN(C)) is a closed subset of it, hence compact. Therefore f is analytically proper, and step 6.1 applies; this is the analytic properness used by the consumers.

Remarks

  • The theorem produces Whitney stratifications and map compatibility only. Tube control data, conical neighbourhoods, radial collars and triangulations are separate constructions, and the theorem asserts nothing about them. The restriction of f to a single nonclosed source stratum need not be proper even when f is proper.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

137 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources