Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Proper Cech descent does not require acyclic fibers

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice; it is inherited from the descent lemma and from the field-dual corollary. Let k be a field and let S=P1(C) be the complex projective line, realized as the classical complex algebraic variety obtained by gluing two affine lines along their punctured overlaps by z=1/w, with its analytic topology (equivalently, the Riemann sphere C^=C∪{∞}). Then the unique morphism f:S→pt is proper surjective, the single fiber S satisfies H2(S;k)≅k≠0 and is therefore not cohomologically acyclic, and yet the augmented Cech complex computes the constant sheaf: the unaugmented product total Tot⁡p≥0RΓ(Sp+1,k) has cohomology k in degree 0 and zero in all other degrees. In every internal degree q the augmented row Hq(k)→Hq(S,k)→Hq(S2,k)→⋯ is contracted by inserting one chosen point as first coordinate, even though the q=2 row contains the nonzero group H2(S;k) at p=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the field k, the two-chart classical complex variety S=P1(C) with its analytic topology, the terminal morphism f:S→pt, and the constant coefficient k; the fiber powers Sp+1 are the products of copies of S over the point, the fiber product of the terminal map. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice is assumed as inherited from the descent lemma and the field-dual corollary.

[F1]

Proper surjections have cohomological descent for constructible field sheaves supplies proper Cech descent for a proper surjective morphism of finite-type complex algebraic varieties with bounded constructible field coefficients, including the global form RΓ(X,F)≃Tot⁡pRΓ(Yp,Fp) and the statement that no fiber acyclicity is assumed.

[F2]

Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties supplies the gluing definition of a classical algebraic variety over C, its finite affine-model covers and its regular maps.

[F3]

Analytic topology and finite smooth algebraic stratifications of complex varieties fixes the analytic topology of a classical complex variety and its compatibility with regular maps.

[F5]

Stereographic projection identifies the Riemann sphere with the unit two-sphere gives the explicit homeomorphism Σ:C^→S2.

[F6]

Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology gives that a homotopy equivalence induces isomorphisms on all singular homology groups.

[F7]

Homology of spheres computes H~2(S2;k)≅k.

[F8]

Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field identifies H2(S;k) with Hom⁡k(H2(S;k),k).

[F9]

Projective classical morphisms defines projective classical morphisms by a closed-immersion factorization.

[F10]

Complex algebraic varieties and maps admit compatible finite stratifications carries the clause that a projective algebraic morphism is proper in the analytic topology, used here for S→pt.

[F11]

Under AC, a metric space with a contractible-open neighbourhood basis has actual derived constant-sheaf cohomology equal to singular cohomology (Locally contractible metric spaces have singular constant sheaf cohomology).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2F3F4F5constructalgebra

The space and its two charts. Glue the affine z-line and affine w-line along zw=1. Their regular transition gives a prevariety with a finite affine cover ([F2], [F3]). Its diagonal is closed: on the two same-chart products equality is z=z′ or w=w′, and on either cross-chart product it is zw′=1 or wz′=1. Equalizers of regular maps are inverse images of this diagonal, so S is separated. The formulas of [F5] define a homeomorphism from this glued space to S2: in the w-chart they become (2Re⁡w,−2Im⁡w,1−∣w∣2)/(1+∣w∣2), including the north pole at w=0; the inverse coordinate there is w=(x−iy)/(1+t), continuous near the north pole. In the other chart the formulas and inverse are those of [F5]. Composing with [F5]'s inverse identifies the analytic topology with the one-point compactification of [F4]. In particular S is compact.

1.2F9F10F1given

The map is proper surjective. The unique morphism f:S→pt is surjective because S is nonempty. It is projective in the sense of [F9]: the identity is a closed immersion S↪pt×P1(C) onto a reduced closed subvariety, and the projection to the point is the structure map. By the properness clause of [F10], a projective algebraic morphism is proper in the analytic topology; hence f is a proper surjective morphism of finite-type complex algebraic varieties, and [F1] applies to it.

1.3F5F6F7F8F11algebra

The single fiber is not acyclic. Stereographic projection is a homeomorphism C^→S2 ([F5]); a homeomorphism is a homotopy equivalence, so it induces isomorphisms on singular homology ([F6]) and H2(S;k)≅H2(S2;k)≅k by [F7]. The field-dual corollary [F8] then gives H2(S;k)≅Hom⁡k(H2(S;k),k)≅k≠0, since k is a field. The sphere is metric with a contractible-open neighbourhood basis, and these properties transfer through the homeomorphism, so [F11] identifies this singular cohomology group with the actual derived constant-sheaf group H2(S,kS). Thus the fiber S of f is not cohomologically acyclic.

2.1F1step 1.3algebra

The rows are still contracted. The fiber of f over the unique point is S and the fiber powers are Sp+1. Choose one point y∈S, for instance the point with z=0, and for r≥0 let insr:Sr→Sr+1 insert y as first coordinate, with S0=pt. For the compositions below the deletion maps are di:Sr+2→Sr+1, and they satisfy d0 insr+1=id and di insr+1=insr di−1 for i>0, so with hp+1:=insp+1∗ and δp the alternating sum of deletion pullbacks one gets hp+1δp+δp−1hp=id in every internal degree q, and h0δ−1=id; hence each augmented row is contractible. In the row q=2 the term at p=0 is H2(S;k)≅k≠0, carried injectively into H2(S2;k); the nonzero group is retained and does not obstruct exactness.

3.1F1F8step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1∎

Conclusion. Applying [F1] to f and the constant sheaf k, and using that the fiber powers of f are Sp+1 and that RΓ(pt,k)=k is concentrated in degree 0, the augmented Cech map k→∼Tot⁡p≥0RΓ(Sp+1,k) is a quasi-isomorphism; therefore the unaugmented product total has cohomology k in degree 0 and zero in every other degree. The example shows that proper Cech descent does not require acyclic fibers: the nonvanishing H2 of the fiber is retained throughout the contracted rows. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the descent lemma and the field-dual corollary, and the construction of S, the homeomorphism with S2, the choice of one point and the insertion argument use no further choice.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

92 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources