How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Proper Cech descent does not require acyclic fibers
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice; it is inherited from the descent lemma and from the field-dual corollary. Let be a field and let be the complex projective line, realized as the classical complex algebraic variety obtained by gluing two affine lines along their punctured overlaps by , with its analytic topology (equivalently, the Riemann sphere ). Then the unique morphism is proper surjective, the single fiber satisfies and is therefore not cohomologically acyclic, and yet the augmented Cech complex computes the constant sheaf: the unaugmented product total has cohomology in degree and zero in all other degrees. In every internal degree the augmented row is contracted by inserting one chosen point as first coordinate, even though the row contains the nonzero group at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the field , the two-chart classical complex variety with its analytic topology, the terminal morphism , and the constant coefficient ; the fiber powers are the products of copies of over the point, the fiber product of the terminal map. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice is assumed as inherited from the descent lemma and the field-dual corollary.
Proper surjections have cohomological descent for constructible field sheaves supplies proper Cech descent for a proper surjective morphism of finite-type complex algebraic varieties with bounded constructible field coefficients, including the global form and the statement that no fiber acyclicity is assumed.
Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties supplies the gluing definition of a classical algebraic variety over , its finite affine-model covers and its regular maps.
Analytic topology and finite smooth algebraic stratifications of complex varieties fixes the analytic topology of a classical complex variety and its compatibility with regular maps.
The one-point (Alexandroff) compactification , whose open sets are the open sets of together with the complements in of the closed compact subsets of and is compact and contains as an open subspace; is dense in exactly when is not compact; and is Hausdorff exactly when is locally compact and Hausdorff supply the Riemann sphere with its topology and the compactness of for every space .
Stereographic projection identifies the Riemann sphere with the unit two-sphere gives the explicit homeomorphism .
Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology gives that a homotopy equivalence induces isomorphisms on all singular homology groups.
Homology of spheres computes .
Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field identifies with .
Projective classical morphisms defines projective classical morphisms by a closed-immersion factorization.
Complex algebraic varieties and maps admit compatible finite stratifications carries the clause that a projective algebraic morphism is proper in the analytic topology, used here for .
Under AC, a metric space with a contractible-open neighbourhood basis has actual derived constant-sheaf cohomology equal to singular cohomology (Locally contractible metric spaces have singular constant sheaf cohomology).
Verification
The space and its two charts. Glue the affine -line and affine -line along . Their regular transition gives a prevariety with a finite affine cover ([F2], [F3]). Its diagonal is closed: on the two same-chart products equality is or , and on either cross-chart product it is or . Equalizers of regular maps are inverse images of this diagonal, so is separated. The formulas of [F5] define a homeomorphism from this glued space to : in the -chart they become , including the north pole at ; the inverse coordinate there is , continuous near the north pole. In the other chart the formulas and inverse are those of [F5]. Composing with [F5]'s inverse identifies the analytic topology with the one-point compactification of [F4]. In particular is compact.
The map is proper surjective. The unique morphism is surjective because is nonempty. It is projective in the sense of [F9]: the identity is a closed immersion onto a reduced closed subvariety, and the projection to the point is the structure map. By the properness clause of [F10], a projective algebraic morphism is proper in the analytic topology; hence is a proper surjective morphism of finite-type complex algebraic varieties, and [F1] applies to it.
The single fiber is not acyclic. Stereographic projection is a homeomorphism ([F5]); a homeomorphism is a homotopy equivalence, so it induces isomorphisms on singular homology ([F6]) and by [F7]. The field-dual corollary [F8] then gives , since is a field. The sphere is metric with a contractible-open neighbourhood basis, and these properties transfer through the homeomorphism, so [F11] identifies this singular cohomology group with the actual derived constant-sheaf group . Thus the fiber of is not cohomologically acyclic.
The rows are still contracted. The fiber of over the unique point is and the fiber powers are . Choose one point , for instance the point with , and for let insert as first coordinate, with . For the compositions below the deletion maps are , and they satisfy and for , so with and the alternating sum of deletion pullbacks one gets in every internal degree , and ; hence each augmented row is contractible. In the row the term at is , carried injectively into ; the nonzero group is retained and does not obstruct exactness.
Conclusion. Applying [F1] to and the constant sheaf , and using that the fiber powers of are and that is concentrated in degree , the augmented Cech map is a quasi-isomorphism; therefore the unaugmented product total has cohomology in degree and zero in every other degree. The example shows that proper Cech descent does not require acyclic fibers: the nonvanishing of the fiber is retained throughout the contracted rows. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the descent lemma and the field-dual corollary, and the construction of , the homeomorphism with , the choice of one point and the insertion argument use no further choice.
Depends on
- Proper surjections have cohomological descent for constructible field sheaves
- Homology of spheres
- Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field
- The Axiom of Choice
- Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties
- Analytic topology and finite smooth algebraic stratifications of complex varieties
- The one-point (Alexandroff) compactification $X^{*} = X \cup \{\infty\}$, whose open sets are the open sets of $X$ together with the complements in $X^{*}$ of the closed compact subsets of $X$
- $X^{*}$ is compact and contains $X$ as an open subspace; $X$ is dense in $X^{*}$ exactly when $X$ is not compact; and $X^{*}$ is Hausdorff exactly when $X$ is locally compact and Hausdorff
- Stereographic projection identifies the Riemann sphere with the unit two-sphere
- Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology
- Projective classical morphisms
- Complex algebraic varieties and maps admit compatible finite stratifications
- Locally contractible metric spaces have singular constant sheaf cohomology
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
92 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- D. Dugger, S. Hollander, D. C. Isaksen, Hypercovers and simplicial presheaves, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 136 (2004), complete arXiv full text; Appendix A read at the cited pages. (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Hypercoverings (Chapter 0DEG), complete PDF; the homological-descent lemmas are read at the cited tags and pages. (standard reference, not scraped)