How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A global fiber basis trivializes Serre monodromy
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a Serre fibration and let be homogeneous classes whose restrictions form an -basis of for every fiber . Then the fiber-cohomology local system is constant, with the displayed restricted classes as its basis.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The fibration, commutative coefficient ring, and supplied finite family in the statement.
Fiber transport is functorial on the base fundamental groupoid gives the cohomological path-transport local system under AC, including naturality for maps of fibers.
Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial gives contravariant restriction and its composition law.
The Axiom of Choice is assumed only for the strict-fiber cohomological comparison used by [F1].
Proof
Let be a path. Fiber transport is represented, up to the equivalence built into [F1], by a map lying over the path. The inclusion maps of the endpoint fibers into are homotopic after composing the first with . Therefore [F2] gives for every , in the variance convention of [F1].
Since the restricted are a basis in both endpoint stalks, step 1.1 says that the transport matrix sends every named basis vector to the corresponding named basis vector. It is therefore the identity matrix. This holds for every path class, so the basis identifies the local system with the constant graded -module .
If , the basis hypothesis says every stalk is the zero module and the conclusion is the constant zero system. The zero ring and zero-degree classes obey the same calculation. A path-connected base is not needed: the argument applies independently on each component on which the same finite list is a basis. No basis or representative is chosen; the list is part of the hypotheses. AC is used exactly through [A1] in [F1].
Depends on
Used by
- Leray–Hirsch fails without a global restricting fiber basis Counterexample
- Leray–Hirsch module isomorphism Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Miller, MIT 18.906 notes, proof of Theorem 33.5 (standard reference, not scraped)