Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed forms for the half-order piecewise-linear product weights

Statement

Use the nodes, hats, and weights wn,j(x)=Sx(ϕn,j) of Piecewise-linear product integration for a half-order diagonal singularity. For x∈[0,1], 0≤α≤β≤1, and u,v∈R, put C:=u+vx and, for r≥0, define Px,u,v(r):=2Cr+23vrr,Qx,u,v(r):=2Cr−23vrr. Write r+:=max⁡(r,0) and set Jx[α,β;u,v]:=Qx,u,v((x−α)+)−Qx,u,v((x−β)+)+Px,u,v((β−x)+)−Px,u,v((α−x)+). Then this is the exact improper Riemann integral Jx[α,β;u,v]=∫αβ∣x−y∣−1/2(u+vy) dy, with the integral split at x if x∈[α,β]. In particular, for h=1/n and yj=jh, wn,0(x)=Jx[0,h;1,−h−1], wn,j(x)=Jx[yj−1,yj;−yj−1/h,h−1]+Jx[yj,yj+1;yj+1/h,−h−1],1≤j<n, and wn,n(x)=Jx[yn−1,1;−yn−1/h,h−1]. The formulas include x at a panel endpoint and the one-panel case n=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: x∈[0,1], 0≤α≤β≤1, u,v∈R, and the hat functions and weights from the product-integration definition.

[F1]

Piecewise-linear product integration for a half-order diagonal singularity: each hat is affine on each adjacent panel, the product weight is wn,j(x)=Sx(ϕn,j), and the hat formulas are specified at both endpoints.

[F2]

The half-order diagonal singularity defines a bounded improper integral: for every continuous g on [0,1], Sx(g) exists as the improper Riemann integral of ∣x−y∣−1/2g(y).

[F3]

Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a: for r≥0, r is the unique nonnegative real whose square is r (the case n=2).

[F5]

The two FTC forms for a Riemann–Stieltjes integral with a C1 integrator: a continuous integrand with an antiderivative on a closed interval has integral equal to the endpoint difference; the identity integrator gives the ordinary Riemann integral.

[F6]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous function on a closed interval has an ordinary Riemann integral.

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement, C=u+vx, and the functions Px,u,v and Qx,u,v.

1.1givenF3F4F8algebra

Fix r>0 and put q:=r, which is positive by [F3] because q2=r>0. For s>0, rationalizing gives ∣s−q∣=∣s−r∣/(s+q)≤∣s−r∣/q, so s→q as s→r. For s≠r the difference quotient is (s−q)/(s−r)=1/(s+q), and ∣1/(s+q)−1/(2q)∣=∣q−s∣/(2q(s+q))≤∣s−r∣/(2q3), so (r)′=1/(2r). By the product rule [F4], Px,u,v′(r)=Cr−1/2+vr=r−1/2(C+vr) and Qx,u,v′(r)=Cr−1/2−vr=r−1/2(C−vr). Since u+vy=C+v(y−x), [F8] makes Px,u,v(y−x) an antiderivative of (y−x)−1/2(u+vy) for y>x. Since u+vy=C−v(x−y), [F8] makes −Qx,u,v(x−y) an antiderivative of (x−y)−1/2(u+vy) for y<x.

2.1givenF2F3F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

By [F3], for every ϵ>0, 0≤δ<ϵ2 implies 0≤δ<ϵ; hence δ→0 and both Px,u,v(δ) and Qx,u,v(δ) tend to zero as δ↓0. If x>α, evaluate the left integral on [α,min⁡(β,x−δ)] for sufficiently small δ>0 using [F6], [F5], and step 1.1. As δ↓0, its value tends to Qx,u,v((x−α)+)−Qx,u,v((x−β)+). If x≤α, the left contribution and this expression are zero. Likewise, if x<β, evaluate the right integral on [max⁡(α,x+δ),β] for sufficiently small δ>0; its limit is Px,u,v((β−x)+)−Px,u,v((α−x)+). If x≥β, the right contribution and this expression are zero. Thus both one-sided integrals exist and have the displayed values. Splitting truncated intervals by [F7] and passing to their finite limits gives exactly Jx[α,β;u,v].

3.1givenF1step 2.1algebra∎

On [0,h], ϕn,0(y)=1−y/h; for an interior index j, its left and right affine pieces are (y−yj−1)/h and (yj+1−y)/h; on [yn−1,1], ϕn,n(y)=(y−yn−1)/h. Substituting these coefficients into the integral formula of step 2.1 gives the three displayed formulas for wn,j. The endpoint cases use positive parts in J, so a singularity at a split point contributes a zero primitive value, and when n=1 the interior-index range is empty while both endpoint formulas remain valid.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources