Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A continuous bijection is a homeomorphism iff it is open iff it is closed, and homeomorphy is an equivalence relation on spaces

Statement

Let XX and YY be topological spaces.

  1. Let f:XYf : X \to Y be a continuous bijection (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological). The following are equivalent:
    • (a) ff is a homeomorphism;
    • (b) ff is an open map;
    • (c) ff is a closed map.
  2. Homeomorphy is an equivalence relation: XXX \cong X; if XYX \cong Y then YXY \cong X; and if XYX \cong Y and YZY \cong Z then XZX \cong Z.

Continuity is a genuine hypothesis in claim 1: a bijection that is open and closed but not continuous exists as soon as two comparable topologies differ, for instance the identity from the coarser to the finer of two distinct topologies on one set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Topological spaces XX, YY, ZZ and a continuous bijection f:XYf : X \to Y with two-sided inverse g:=f1:YXg := f^{-1} : Y \to X. For a bijection ff and any AXA \subseteq X one has f[A]=g1[A]f[A] = g^{-1}[A], and f[XA]=Yf[A]f[X \setminus A] = Y \setminus f[A].

[A1]

ff is a homeomorphism when it is a continuous bijection and f1f^{-1} is continuous; ff is an open map when images of open sets are open, and a closed map when images of closed sets are closed (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).

[A2]

A bijection has a unique two-sided inverse, which is itself a bijection, and the inverse of f1f^{-1} is ff (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since ff is a bijection with inverse gg, for every AXA \subseteq X the image f[A]f[A] coincides with the preimage g1[A]g^{-1}[A]: yg1[A]y \in g^{-1}[A] means g(y)Ag(y) \in A, and applying ff gives yf[A]y \in f[A], while the converse substitution is the same computation read backwards.

givenA2
1.2

Since ff is a bijection, f[XA]=Yf[A]f[X \setminus A] = Y \setminus f[A] for every AXA \subseteq X: surjectivity gives \supseteq and injectivity gives \subseteq.

given
1.3

The identity map of a space is a continuous bijection whose inverse is itself, hence a homeomorphism.

A1L1
1.4

If h:XYh : X \to Y is a homeomorphism then so is h1:YXh^{-1} : Y \to X: it is a bijection, it is continuous by hypothesis, and its own inverse is hh, which is continuous.

A1A2
2.1

(a) is equivalent to (b): by step 1.1, gg is continuous exactly when g1[U]=f[U]g^{-1}[U] = f[U] is open for every open UXU \subseteq X, that is exactly when ff is an open map.

step 1.1A1L1
2.2

(b) is equivalent to (c): by step 1.2, ff carries the complement of AA to the complement of f[A]f[A], so images of open sets are open exactly when images of closed sets are closed, the two families being exchanged by complementation.

step 1.2A1L1
2.3

If h:XYh : X \to Y and k:YZk : Y \to Z are homeomorphisms then khk \circ h is a homeomorphism: it is a bijection with inverse h1k1h^{-1} \circ k^{-1}, and both khk \circ h and h1k1h^{-1} \circ k^{-1} are continuous as composites of continuous maps.

step 1.4A1A2L2
3.1

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove claim 1, and steps 1.3, 1.4 and 2.3 give reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity of \cong, which is claim 2.

step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3

Remarks

  • The lemma is how homeomorphy is verified in practice. Producing a continuous inverse directly usually means writing a formula and checking continuity a second time; checking instead that the map carries open sets to open sets, or closed sets to closed sets, uses only the map itself.

  • A continuous bijection that is not a homeomorphism. Take any set carrying two distinct comparable topologies and let ff be the identity from the finer to the coarser: it is a continuous bijection, and it is not open, because an open set of the finer topology that is not open in the coarser one is its own image. Both an explicit two-point instance and an instance on R\mathbb{R} appear on this page and on the companion page.

  • What claim 2 licenses. Because \cong is an equivalence relation, "a topological property" is well defined as a property constant on \cong-classes (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological), and statements of the form "XX is not homeomorphic to YY" can be proved by exhibiting one topological property on which they differ.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 24 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources