How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A continuous bijection is a homeomorphism iff it is open iff it is closed, and homeomorphy is an equivalence relation on spaces
Statement
Let and be topological spaces.
- Let be a continuous bijection
(Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological). The
following are equivalent:
- (a) is a homeomorphism;
- (b) is an open map;
- (c) is a closed map.
- Homeomorphy is an equivalence relation: ; if then ; and if and then .
Continuity is a genuine hypothesis in claim 1: a bijection that is open and closed but not continuous exists as soon as two comparable topologies differ, for instance the identity from the coarser to the finer of two distinct topologies on one set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Topological spaces , , and a continuous bijection with two-sided inverse . For a bijection and any one has , and .
is a homeomorphism when it is a continuous bijection and is continuous; is an open map when images of open sets are open, and a closed map when images of closed sets are closed (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).
A bijection has a unique two-sided inverse, which is itself a bijection, and the inverse of is (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of open sets are open, and exactly when preimages of closed sets are closed (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and , clauses (b) and (c)).
A composite of continuous maps is continuous (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous, claim 1).
Proof
Since is a bijection with inverse , for every the image coincides with the preimage : means , and applying gives , while the converse substitution is the same computation read backwards.
Since is a bijection, for every : surjectivity gives and injectivity gives .
The identity map of a space is a continuous bijection whose inverse is itself, hence a homeomorphism.
If is a homeomorphism then so is : it is a bijection, it is continuous by hypothesis, and its own inverse is , which is continuous.
(a) is equivalent to (b): by step 1.1, is continuous exactly when is open for every open , that is exactly when is an open map.
(b) is equivalent to (c): by step 1.2, carries the complement of to the complement of , so images of open sets are open exactly when images of closed sets are closed, the two families being exchanged by complementation.
If and are homeomorphisms then is a homeomorphism: it is a bijection with inverse , and both and are continuous as composites of continuous maps.
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove claim 1, and steps 1.3, 1.4 and 2.3 give reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity of , which is claim 2.
Remarks
-
The lemma is how homeomorphy is verified in practice. Producing a continuous inverse directly usually means writing a formula and checking continuity a second time; checking instead that the map carries open sets to open sets, or closed sets to closed sets, uses only the map itself.
-
A continuous bijection that is not a homeomorphism. Take any set carrying two distinct comparable topologies and let be the identity from the finer to the coarser: it is a continuous bijection, and it is not open, because an open set of the finer topology that is not open in the coarser one is its own image. Both an explicit two-point instance and an instance on appear on this page and on the companion page.
-
What claim 2 licenses. Because is an equivalence relation, "a topological property" is well defined as a property constant on -classes (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological), and statements of the form " is not homeomorphic to " can be proved by exhibiting one topological property on which they differ.
Depends on
- Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological
- For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and $f(\overline{A}) \subseteq \overline{f(A)}$
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
- Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous
Used by
- The identity from the discrete topology on ℝ to the usual topology is a continuous bijection that is not a homeomorphism Counterexample
- The Cantor set is homeomorphic to {0,1}^ℕ with the product of discrete topologies, the ternary digits being the coordinates Example
- FALSE: every continuous bijection of topological spaces is a homeomorphism False statement
- A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism Theorem
- A map out of a disjoint union is continuous iff each of its restrictions is; the canonical injections are open and closed embeddings; and each summand is clopen in the union Theorem
- A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology Theorem
- Every quotient map q : X → Y induces a homeomorphism from X modulo the relation "q agrees" onto Y, so up to homeomorphism the quotient maps out of X are exactly the canonical projections Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 24 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Homeomorphism (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Open and closed maps (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Munkres, Topology, 2nd ed., §18 (standard reference, not scraped)