How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scaling the perimeter of a disk inclusion
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let , , , and let be open with . Then , its distributional derivative is and
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , and an open with .
For , on smooth compactly supported tests; if is a vector measure, is the supremum of over Borel partitions of , and . (Spatial BV and distributional total variation)
On an epigraph of a locally Lipschitz graph, a smooth vector field supported away from the chart sides has divergence integral ; the sign reverses for a subgraph. For smooth graphs, [F4] identifies this with outward-normal surface flux. (Lipschitz graph area and calculus under Countable Choice)
For a diffeomorphism , the change-of-variables identity holds for every nonnegative Lebesgue-measurable integrand; additivity gives the corresponding identity for an integrable signed integrand by applying it to its positive and negative parts. (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral)
Surface measure on a compact hypersurface is the chart integral; the regular chart density is the square root of the Gram determinant, so a circle parametrization has density equal to its speed. (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, Chart and partition independence of surface measure)
The derivative of a composition is the product of the derivative matrices. (The chain rule for total derivatives: )
Countable Choice is assumed at the graph-calculus, surface-integral, and change-of-variables interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Proof
Given: The data in the statement.
Put and first prove its flux formula directly from [F2]. Cover by finitely many graph neighborhoods, each expressing locally as an epigraph or subgraph of a smooth function, and add an interior open set compactly contained in to cover . Rigid changes of coordinates preserve volume, divergence and normal flux by [F3]–[F5], so the graph identities apply in these coordinates. Choose smooth nonnegative functions compactly supported in those sets and with on : finitely many smaller balls cover this compact set, and ordinary Euclidean smooth bumps positive on those balls supply the functions. Normalize their sum on a neighborhood of , using one additional smooth cutoff equal to one near and supported where that sum is positive. This gives functions subordinate to the same sets with near . For any smooth compactly supported vector field , apply [F2] to in each boundary graph patch. Its divergence integral over is its outward flux over by [F4], because the graph domain and agree on the support. The interior piece has divergence integral zero: its support is compact inside , so choose a horizontal line below that support and apply [F2] on the half-plane above that line. The field vanishes on the line and its half-plane integral equals its whole-space integral, which equals its integral over . Summing the finitely many identities, the derivatives of the partition cancel since its sum is one near . Consequently . This proves the required unit-disk identity without using a B-example or a stronger-choice divergence theorem.
Let and, for arbitrary , put . By [F5], . Applying [F3] to the positive and negative parts of , whose integrals are finite because is smooth and compactly supported, gives By step 1.1 this is . The circle parametrization in [F4] has outward normal and arclength element , so this last expression equals . Thus for every test field; [F1] yields .
By [F4], the circle is parametrized with speed , so . For any Borel partition of , [F1] and give . For the reverse bound, partition the circle into equal arcs and their finitely many endpoints. The endpoints have zero arclength; on each arc, direct integration of gives a vector of norm . Thus the partition sum is , which tends to as . By the partition definition in [F1], . This finite variation proves .
Because , the full derivative measure in step 1.2 is supported inside . Hence .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Spatial BV and distributional total variation
- Lipschitz graph area and calculus under Countable Choice
- Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces
- Chart and partition independence of surface measure
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
- Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- The chain rule for total derivatives: $D(g\circ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))\circ Df(a)$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gláucio Terra, Introduction to Geometric Measure Theory — Lecture Notes, version 1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)