How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compactly supported BV cutoffs for finite-variation L² functions
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. If and , there exist smooth cutoffs with , on , support in , and . For every family satisfying these four conditions, belongs to , has support in , converges to in , and
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and with finite .
Countable Choice is the axiom used to obtain the finite Radon derivative from the test-field bound. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Distributional TV as an extended functional on L² and Finite L² distributional variation has a finite Radon derivative: is a finite vector Radon measure and .
A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls: a smooth cutoff exists that equals one on the unit ball and is supported in the ball of radius two; rescaling by bounds its gradient by a fixed constant times .
Proof
By [F2], choose with , on , , and let for integers . This proves existence of a family with . Now fix any family satisfying all four conditions in the statement, write , and put . Then has compact support, hence is in , and in because on and .
For every scalar , local integrability of and the definition of distributional derivative give Thus . The variation of the first term is at most , and the second has variation at most by Cauchy–Schwarz and the annulus area bound . This error tends to zero. Since and its derivative is a finite vector Radon measure, , and [F1] yields . The estimate applies to the arbitrary controlled family fixed in step 1.1 and proves the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- José A. Iglesias, Gwenael Mercier, and Otmar Scherzer, A note on convergence of solutions of total variation regularized linear inverse problems, §1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gláucio Terra, Introduction to Geometric Measure Theory — Lecture Notes, version 1.6, §7.4 (standard reference, not scraped)