Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sharp planar isoperimetric inequality for finite-perimeter sets

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Every Lebesgue-measurable set E⊆R2 with finite area and finite perimeter satisfies 4π∣E∣≤P(E;R2)2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and a measurable E⊆R2 with ∣E∣<∞ and P(E;R2)<∞.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used by strict smooth approximation and the regular-level selections. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Every finite-perimeter L1 function on R2 has compactly supported smooth strict approximants uj: uj→u in L1 and ∫∣∇uj∣→TV(u;R2). (Strict smooth approximation in BV)

[F2]

For u∈C∞(R2)∩L1 with integrable gradient, the integral of its gradient norm equals the sum of the perimeter integrals of its positive-superlevel and negative-sublevel sets; outside a null set of levels the levels are regular and have finite perimeter. (Coarea identity for smooth scalar functions, Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps)

[F3]

The distributional total variation is the supremum over smooth compactly supported vector fields of norm at most one; on a compact smooth planar domain, Stokes gives the boundary flux formula needed to identify the distributional derivative of its indicator. (Test-field formula and L1 lower semicontinuity of spatial TV, General Stokes agrees with both planar Green formulas)

[F4]

The partition variation of a vector Radon measure is a Radon measure; for a unit normal field ν on a compact smooth curve, the variation of ν H1 is H1. (Variation of a finite vector Radon measure is Radon)

[F5]

A nonempty compact connected smooth one-dimensional manifold without boundary is diffeomorphic to a circle. (A nonempty compact connected one-dimensional manifold without boundary is a circle)

[F6]

Parseval's identity holds for Fourier series on the circle: the squared L2 norm is the sum of squared Fourier coefficients. (The Parseval identity for Fourier series)

Proof

1.1F3F4F5givenconstruct

First suppose G⊂R2 is a bounded open set with compact smooth boundary Γ. The boundary is a compact smooth one-dimensional manifold without boundary. Connected coordinate arcs cover Γ; compactness gives a finite subcover, so Γ has finitely many connected components. By [F5] each component is a smooth embedded circle. Parametrize component i by an orientation-compatible unit-speed smooth periodic curve γi:[0,Li]→R2, where Li is its length. The divergence formula in [F3] gives DχG=−ν H1∣Γ with ν the outward normal, and [F4] therefore gives P(G;R2)=H1(Γ)=∑iLi. Applying Stokes in [F3] to ω=(x dy−y dx)/2, whose exterior derivative is dx∧dy, gives ∣G∣=12∑i∫0Li(γi,1γi,2′−γi,2γi,1′) ds. For each i, translating γi by its arclength mean γˉi=Li−1∫0Liγi(s) ds does not change this integral, since each coordinate derivative integrates to zero over a period. Write zi=γi−γˉi.

1.2A1F1givenchoose

Now let E be as in the Statement and put u=χE. By [F1], choose uj∈Cc∞(R2) with ej:=∥uj−χE∥1→0 and aj:=∫∣∇uj∣→P(E;R2). If ∣E∣=0, the result is immediate. If some ej=0, continuity forces uj to take only the values 0 and 1 everywhere; connectedness of R2 and compact support then force uj=0, contradicting ∣E∣>0. Thus ej>0. Let τj=ej and discard finitely many terms so 0<τj<min⁡{1/2,∣E∣/2}. For every t∈Ij:=[τj,1−τj], a point where χE and χ{uj>t} differ contributes at least τj to ∣uj−χE∣; hence ∣{uj>t}△E∣≤ej/τj=τj.

2.1F6step 1.1algebra

For a smooth L-periodic scalar function z of mean zero, set v(θ)=z(Lθ/(2π)). Its zeroth Fourier coefficient vanishes. Integration by parts gives v′^(k)=ikv^(k) for every integer k. Parseval [F6] and k2≥1 for k≠0 imply ∫02π∣v∣2 dθ≤∫02π∣v′∣2 dθ. Changing variables yields ∫0L∣z(s)∣2 ds≤(L2π)2∫0L∣z′(s)∣2 ds. Apply this to both coordinates of zi and add. Since ∣zi′∣=∣γi′∣=1, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality gives ∣12∫0Li(zi,1zi,2′−zi,2zi,1′) ds∣≤12∥zi∥L2∥zi′∥L2≤Li24π. Summing over the finitely many boundary components and using ∑iLi2≤(∑iLi)2 proves 4π∣G∣≤P(G;R2)2.

3.1A1F2step 2.1step 1.2choose

By [F2], the measurable level-perimeter function has integral at most aj on Ij, whose length is 1−2τj. For any ε>0, the set of t∈Ij with P({uj>t};R2)≤aj/(1−2τj)+ε has positive measure; otherwise its integral over Ij would exceed aj. The critical values of uj form a null set by [F2], so take ε=1/(j+1) and choose such a regular value tj. Since tj>0 and uj is compactly supported, Gj:={uj>tj} is bounded and its closure is a compact smooth domain with boundary {uj=tj}. Thus step 2.1 applies to Gj, and ∣Gj△E∣≤τj,P(Gj;R2)≤aj1−2τj+1j+1. The right side has limit P(E;R2), while ∣Gj∣→∣E∣.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Step 2.1 gives 4π∣Gj∣≤P(Gj;R2)2 for every selected j. Taking upper limits, the convergence ∣Gj∣→∣E∣ and the perimeter upper bound from step 3.1 give 4π∣E∣≤P(E;R2)2. This proves the claimed inequality for every finite-measure finite-perimeter set.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources