How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuity of finite conditional entropy in the joint law
Statement
For fixed finite nonempty alphabets , the map from a joint probability vector on to its conditional entropy is continuous on the joint probability simplex.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite alphabets and a joint probability vector .
Finite conditional entropy: , with zero-mass conditioning values omitted.
Marginals and positive-mass conditionals of a finite joint law are probability vectors: the marginals of a finite joint law are probability vectors, and each positive-mass conditional vector is a probability vector.
Finite relative entropy is continuous on a simplex with positive reference law: if is a fixed full-support probability vector on a finite alphabet, then is finite and continuous on the full simplex, including its boundary.
Proof
Let be a probability vector on an alphabet of size , and let be the uniform vector. Expanding the finite sum in [F3] gives , including zero coordinates by the stated convention. Since has full support, [F4] shows that is continuous. Therefore finite entropy is continuous on every finite simplex.
For any joint vector , [F1] and [F2] give . The ratio is defined on every positive joint atom because then . The marginal map is linear. By step 1.1, both terms on the right are continuous functions of , so their difference is continuous on the joint simplex.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, author-hosted book draft (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)