How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Iterated cofibers rotate with suspension reflection
Statement
For a based map of well-pointed CGWH spaces, put and let be the next cofiber inclusion. The collapse is a based homotopy equivalence with , where collapses . Under it, the next cofiber map agrees up to based homotopy with . Suspension commutes with cone formation, with the two-coordinate interchange in the quotient map retained.
Facts & Assumptions
Cones attach at height zero, and negative suspension reflects the height. Reduced cone suspension and cofiber sequence
Product pairs and pushouts preserve cofibrations. Pushouts and products preserve the cofibrations used here
Collapsing the cone of a based cofibration is a homotopy equivalence. Cofiber of a based cofibration is equivalent to the quotient
Quotient homotopies descend continuously. Interval exponential law and quotient homotopies
Proof
Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.
The product-pair construction for the well-pointed pair (X,{x0}) and the interval endpoints gives a cofibration of into . Collapse the top and basepoint track: pushout HEP gives the based cone-base cofibration . Its pushout along f makes a cofibration. F3 therefore gives the homotopy equivalence . On the included copy this collapse is literally , so .
In , write a point of the cone portion as (x,s,t), with s the cone coordinate and t the suspension coordinate. Sending it to (x,t,s) in , and [y,t] to [y,t] on the target part, respects every collapsed subset and the attaching relation. The same coordinate interchange is its continuous inverse by F4. The resulting final quotient on interchanges its two suspension coordinates, rather than acting identically.
Identify with . On CX set in , and on CY set . At s=0 the two values agree via f. At the CX tip s=1 the value is [f(x),0]=; at the CY tip it is [y,1]=. The basepoint tracks are constant. F4 descends these continuous formulas. At t=0 the map collapses CX and is the usual quotient of CY; at t=1 it is after ψ on CX and is constant on CY. This proves the claimed reflected next arrow.
To identify the interchange sign explicitly, model by the one-point compactification of using the same increasing coordinate homeomorphism in each variable. Swap is the linear map T(v1,v2)=(v2,v1), and first-coordinate reflection is R(v1,v2)=(-v1,v2). The matrix is a quarter-turn rotation. A path of rotations from it to the identity gives a path of invertible matrices from T to R. These matrices are orthogonal, so they preserve norms uniformly and extend to a homotopy fixing infinity. Keeping X as a parameter and collapsing its basepoint gives interchange homotopic to single-coordinate reflection on . Thus iteration preserves exactly the reflection sign in the cofiber convention.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)