Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Interval exponential law and quotient homotopies

Statement

For arbitrary topological spaces X,Y, with C0(I,Y) carrying the ordinary compact-open topology, the assignments H(x,t)=h(x)(t) give a bijection between continuous maps X×IY and XC0(I,Y). If q:XQ is an arbitrary quotient map, q×idI is an ordinary quotient map. For CG spaces the correspondence lifts to kified mapping spaces and respects based restrictions and homotopies. For CGWH targets the based mapping subspaces are CGWH.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

Evaluation C0(I,Y)×IY is continuous: at (f,t) with f(t)O open, choose a closed interval neighbourhood J of t contained in f1O. Then W(J,O)×intIJ is a neighbourhood mapping into O. Relative interval neighbourhoods work at 0 and 1.

algebra
2.1

For continuous H:X×IY, the inverse image of W(K,O) under h(x)=H(x,) is open: for any of its points x, the open set H1O contains {x}×K and F1 supplies a tube. Thus h is continuous into C0(I,Y). Conversely compose h×idI with step 1.1. The resulting functions are inverse under evaluation at each (x,t).

F1step 1.1
3.1

If a continuous H:X×IY is constant on each fibre of q×idI, its transpose is constant on q-fibres. By F2 it descends to a continuous QC0(I,Y), which uncurries by step 2.1 to a continuous Q×IY. Apply this to the characteristic function of UQ×I into the Sierpinski space with opens ,{1},{0,1}. Continuity of the characteristic function is exactly openness of U. If (q×id)1U is open, the preceding descent makes U open. The map is surjective and continuous; hence it is quotient.

F2step 2.1
4.1

For CG spaces the kified correspondence is F4; the interval product already has its ordinary topology. Endpoint and basepoint equations are preserved pointwise by transpose and inverse transpose. Continuous maps from CG parameters landing in the corresponding subspace lift to its kification by the CG-source property contained in the conventions of F4. For WH targets these subspaces are closed and CGWH by F5; F3 supplies the closed-track quotient constructions. Applying the same correspondence to a cylinder parameter, or using the quotient-times-I conclusion of step 3.1, carries relative and based homotopies to relative and based homotopies.

F3F4F5step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources