Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pushouts and products preserve the cofibrations used here

Statement

In CGWH, pushouts preserve cofibrations, and k-products with any CGWH space preserve HEP. For two unbased closed cofibration pairs (X,A) and (Y,B), the inclusion X×kBA×kYX×kY is a cofibration. In particular this supplies the finite endpoint and disk-cylinder boundary constructions. The based versions use based data and collapse the fixed basepoint tracks.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

HEP is equivalent to the strip retraction and implies a closed embedding. Cofibrations are characterized by a retraction of the mapping cylinder strip

[F2]

Closed pushouts are CGWH with their ordinary quotient topology. Compact generation preserves the cylinder and closed pushouts

[F3]

CG products preserve quotient maps and satisfy the exponential law. Compact-test exponential law and products of quotient maps

[F4]

Ordinary quotient maps remain quotient after product with I. Interval exponential law and quotient homotopies

Proof

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

For a pushout P=XAB and test data on B, restrict the initial map to X and the B-homotopy along AB. HEP of AX gives an extension on X×I. It agrees on A×I with the given B-homotopy, so the two descend to P×I by F2 and F4. This proves pushout HEP. For a product inclusion, tensor the strip retraction of F1 with the identity of the other factor. F3 identifies its target with the strip for the product inclusion, proving HEP there. These retractions also work for arbitrary test targets by composition.

F1F2F3F4
1.2

For a closed cofibration pair let r=(r1,r2) retract X×I onto X×{0}A×I. Put h(x,t)=r1(x,t) and u(x)=maxtI(tr2(x,t)). The maximum exists by F5 and lies in I, since the t=0 value is zero. It is continuous: at fixed x and ε>0, continuity of tr2(x,t) and a finite cover of the compact interval give a neighbourhood V of x on which its values differ from those at x uniformly by less than ε. Index the cover by all suitable open rectangles and extract finitely many; no infinite selection is required. The same bound holds for the maxima.

F1F5F6
2.1

For a∈A, u(a)=0 and h(a,t)=a. If u(x)=0 then r2(x,t)t>0 for t>0, so h(x,t) lies in A. Since A is closed and h(x,0)=x, this implies x∈A. If u(x)<1, then r2(x,1)>0, so h(x,1)∈A. Thus u vanishes precisely on A and h moves every point with u<1 into A while fixing A.

F1step 1.2
3.1

Obtain (v,j) similarly for (Y,B) and put w(x,y)=min(u(x),v(y)). If vu and v>0 set K(x,y,t)=(h(x,t),j(y,tu/v)); if uv and u>0 set K(x,y,t)=(h(x,tv/u),j(y,t)); if u=v=0 set K=(x,y). The formulas agree at u=v>0. At u=v=0, F6 and the fixed-point identities for h,j show that nearby inputs remain in prescribed neighbourhoods uniformly for every homotopy time; the ratios always belong to I. Thus K is continuous also there. It fixes X×BA×Y, starts at the identity, and at t=1 lands in that union whenever w<1. Its zero set is exactly that union.

F3F6step 1.2step 2.1
4.1

For any data (w,K) just obtained, retract the strip by R(z,t)=(K(z,t/w(z)),0) when 0tw(z) and w(z)>0, and by R(z,t)=(K(z,1),tw(z)) when tw(z), including w=0. The clauses agree at t=w>0. A positive second coordinate implies w<1, so the first coordinate lies in the subspace. It fixes the bottom and the entire subspace strip. At w=t=0, compact-time tube control as in step 3.1 proves continuity; elsewhere the formulas are continuous by pasting. F1 proves the product-pair cofibration.

F1F6step 3.1
5.1

For the disk boundary an explicit primitive retraction is R(x,t)=(λx,2+λ(t2)) with λ=1/max(1t/2,x) on Dm×I. The denominator is at least 1/2; either the height is zero or the spatial norm is one. All outputs lie in the cylinder, and the bottom and side are fixed because λ=1 there. For m=0 the formula sends the point-cylinder to its bottom and the boundary is empty. These give the finite endpoint and cell-boundary instances of the product construction. With based data every common basepoint track is fixed, so F2–F4 descend the extensions and homotopies through its collapse.

F1F2F3F4step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources