Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The lowest weight space is the nilradical-invariant line

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let g be a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra with Cartan subalgebra h, fixed positive system, negative nilradical n− and Weyl vector ρ, and let μ be a dominant integral weight. Then the space of n−-invariants of the finite-dimensional irreducible module L(μ) is one-dimensional and equals its lowest weight space: dim⁡L(μ)n−=1,L(μ)n−=L(μ)w0μ, the lowest weight being w0μ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, such g,h,n−, a dominant integral weight μ, the finite-dimensional irreducible module L(μ) and the longest Weyl element w0.

[F1]

If a representation V is generated by a highest weight vector v of weight λ, then V=U(n−)v, every weight of V is of the form λ−∑iniαi with ni≥0 and hence lies below λ in the root order, and Vλ=Cv (Highest weight modules lie below the top weight).

[F2]

A finite-dimensional irreducible highest weight module V of highest weight λ has one-dimensional λ-weight space, dim⁡Vλ=1 (The highest-weight space is one-dimensional).

[F3]

For λ dominant integral, the dual module V(λ)∗ is irreducible of highest weight −w0(λ); the dual action is (xf)(v)=−f(xv) (Highest weight of the dual representation, Direct-sum, dual, Hom, and tensor representations).

[F4]

By the classification of finite-dimensional irreducible representations, L(μ) is the unique such module of highest weight μ up to isomorphism; it is a highest weight module in the sense of Highest-weight vectors and modules, so it contains a nonzero highest weight vector vμ of weight μ with n+vμ=0, and it is generated by vμ because a finite-dimensional irreducible representation is generated by any of its highest weight vectors (Highest-weight classification, Highest-weight vectors and modules, An irreducible module is generated by its highest-weight vector).

[F5]

The negative nilradical is n−=⨁α∈Φ+g−α, a sum of weight spaces for the weights −α with α∈Φ+, so every element of n− is a sum of weight vectors of weights −γ with γ a nonnegative integer combination of positive roots, nonzero unless the element is zero (Positive and negative nilpotent subalgebras and the Borel, Weight and weight space).

[F6]

The evaluation pairing V×V∗→C, (v,f)↦f(v), is nondegenerate and g-invariant for the dual action of [F3], and the weight spaces of V and V∗ satisfy dim⁡(V∗)−ν=dim⁡Vν for every weight ν of V (Direct-sum, dual, Hom, and tensor representations, Weight and weight space).

Proof

1.1F1F3F4given

Let vμ be a highest weight vector of the finite-dimensional irreducible module V=L(μ), which exists and generates V by [F4]. Apply [F1] with λ=μ: V=U(n−)vμ, all weights of V lie below μ, and Vμ=Cvμ. Applying [F3] and [F4] to V, its dual V∗ is finite-dimensional irreducible of highest weight −w0μ with a highest weight vector v∗ generating V∗, and its weights lie below −w0μ by [F1].

2.1F1F5step 1.1algebra

Write V=Cvμ+n−V: every y∈U(n−) is a sum of a scalar and of nonempty products of elements of n−, and a nonempty product x1⋯xkvμ=x1(x2⋯xkvμ) lies in n−V; by step 1.1 this covers all of V. The sum is direct: an element of n−V is a sum of vectors xv with x∈n− a weight vector of weight −γ, γ≠0, by [F5], so its weight components are of weights ν−γ where ν is a weight of V; if such a component had weight μ, then ν=μ+γ would be a weight of V strictly above μ, contradicting step 1.1. Hence n−V∩Cvμ=0 and V/n−V≅Vμ=Cvμ is one-dimensional.

2.2F1F2F5step 1.1algebra

The same computation with V replaced by V∗, using its highest weight −w0μ and its generating highest weight vector from step 1.1, gives V∗=Cv∗⊕n−V∗ and V∗/n−V∗≅(V∗)−w0μ, which is one-dimensional by [F2].

3.1F3F6step 2.2algebra

Identify V with the double dual (V∗)∗ by v↦(v↦f(v)), using nondegeneracy of the evaluation pairing [F6]. For u∈V and x∈n−, f∈V∗ one has (xf)(u)=−f(xu) by [F3], so the functional attached to u vanishes on n−V∗ exactly when xu=0 for all x∈n−, that is exactly when u∈Vn−. Therefore Vn− is identified with the annihilator of n−V∗ in (V∗)∗, which is the dual space of V∗/n−V∗; this identification is h-equivariant, since it is given by the canonical evaluations. By step 2.2 it follows that dim⁡Vn−=1 and that the single weight of this line is −(−w0μ)=w0μ, the negative of the weight of V∗/n−V∗.

4.1F1F2F6step 3.1algebra∎

By [F6] the pairing pairs the weight space Vw0μ nondegenerately with (V∗)−w0μ, so dim⁡Vw0μ=dim⁡(V∗)−w0μ=1 by [F2] applied to the irreducible module V∗ of highest weight −w0μ. Every weight ν of V satisfies ν≥w0μ: the pairing is nondegenerate, so −ν is a weight of V∗, and by [F1] applied to V∗ one has −ν below −w0μ, that is ν−w0μ∈Q+; hence w0μ is the lowest weight of V and Vw0μ is its lowest weight space. Step 3.1 produces a one-dimensional h-stable line of weight w0μ inside Vn−, hence inside the one-dimensional space Vw0μ; therefore Vn−=Vw0μ and both are one-dimensional.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources