How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Well-definedness and best approximation of the Maxwell Ritz map
Statement
In the Countable Choice branch of Maxwell curl-energy Ritz projection, the equation defining has a unique solution for each . Moreover, with ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite-dimensional real edge space and symmetric form from Maxwell curl-energy Ritz projection, with uniformly positive definite and .
Countable Choice is inherited from the H(div) and affine Piola definitions that supply the FE spaces; the local linear-algebra argument below uses only the given finite space. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), Maxwell curl-energy Ritz projection)
The mass form and curl form are symmetric, and their sum satisfies for some . (Maxwell curl-energy Ritz projection)
Proof
By [F1], the Gram matrix of in any basis of the finite-dimensional is symmetric positive definite. Hence its kernel is zero and it is invertible, so the linear system defining has exactly one solution.
Subtracting the defining equation from itself gives for every .
For arbitrary , write . The second summand lies in , so [step 1.2] makes the cross term zero in the inner product. Thus . Taking the infimum proves the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Maxwell curl-energy Ritz projection.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Long Chen, Finite Element Methods for Maxwell Equations, complete lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)