How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Mod-two cohomology rings of complex projective spaces
Statement
Assume AC. For every integer , where is reduction modulo two of the normalized integral generator. Also All odd cohomology groups vanish. Standard skeletal restrictions preserve the named generators and are isomorphisms in every degree at most twice the complex dimension of the finite target.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard finite skeleta and coefficients .
A CW complex with no cells in adjacent dimensions has zero cellular boundary computes a cellular complex with no adjacent cells, while Cellular homology computes singular homology, Oriented cellular chain group, and Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps compare its oriented cell generators and skeletal maps with singular homology.
Under AC, Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology gives natural evaluation exact sequences for integral and mod-two cohomology, natural also in coefficient homomorphisms.
Long exact sequence of a pair in singular cohomology and Naturality of the singular cohomology pair sequence give exact pair sequences and their natural squares.
Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology applies to the coordinate retractions below, and Excision for singular cohomology removes closed coordinate hyperplanes lying inside the open relative subspaces.
Under AC, Local coordinate cup products generate top relative cohomology says that the two coefficient-one local generators on have nonzero top mod-two relative cup product when .
Relative cup products are natural and connector-compatible transports open relative products. Pullback is a unital ring homomorphism by Cup product is natural, unital and associative.
Singular cochain complex with coefficients, Singular cup product on cochains, and Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial make coefficient reduction valuewise on cochains and make it commute with coboundary, pullback, and the front/back cup formula.
The Axiom of Choice is assumed exactly through [F2] and [F5].
Proof
Proof technique: build the standard even-cell filtration explicitly, compute its additive groups, prove finite products by local relative coordinates, and detect infinite powers on finite skeleta.
The standard filtration gives one oriented cell in each even dimension and no odd cells. [given, construct] Write as nonzero vectors in modulo nonzero complex scaling. Attach a real -disk to by The boundary lands in , while each line outside has a unique unit representative whose last coordinate is positive real, so the open disk maps homeomorphically to the complement. The attachment quotient is compact. Projective space is Hausdorff because a unit vector maps to the rank-one matrix , whose fibres are precisely scalar-phase orbits; the induced continuous bijection from the compact phase quotient to its matrix image is a homeomorphism. Hence the attachment map from its compact quotient to is a homeomorphism. Starting from gives compatible cells in dimensions . Orient the -cell by the ordered real and imaginary coordinates of .
Integral homology is one copy of in each occupied even degree, naturally under skeletal inclusions. [F1, step 1.1] There are no cells in adjacent dimensions, so [F1] makes every cellular differential zero and compares the resulting groups with singular homology. The positive -cell in the standard gives the generator of for . A standard inclusion is the identity on each cell it contains, so [F1] makes its homology map the identity on these generators. The union has the same calculation in every fixed degree: one copy of in nonnegative even degrees and zero in odd degrees.
Integral and mod-two cohomology are additively determined, with natural skeletal restrictions. [F2, A1, step 2.1] In [F2], all Ext terms vanish because the preceding integral homology group in each even degree is zero and the preceding group in each odd degree is free. Evaluation therefore gives and for , with all odd groups zero; the same holds in every degree for . Naturality and step 2.1 make restriction to an isomorphism through degree . Let be the class evaluating as on the positive cell when , and put . Restrictions preserve these normalized classes.
Reduction modulo two of the normalized integral class is the unique finite degree-two generator. [F2, F7, step 3.1] For , choose an integral cocycle representing and reduce its values modulo two. By [F7], this commutes with coboundary and is independent of the cocycle representative; it defines . Coefficient naturality of evaluation in [F2] makes evaluate as on the mod-two reduction of the positive cell, so it is nonzero and hence is the unique class in degree two. The front/back formula in [F7] shows that reduction commutes with cup products. Put . Restriction preserves every because it preserves and commutes with coefficient reduction.
Complementary coordinate projective subspaces admit the required explicit retractions. [F4, step 4.1] Fix with . Let use coordinates , let use , and let . Put and . Scaling to zero retracts and onto the same coordinate ; the first coordinates cannot all vanish on either domain. Symmetrically, and retract onto . Scaling only to zero retracts onto a coordinate . Each formula commutes with complex scaling, never produces the zero vector on its stated domain, fixes the target, and is continuous in affine coordinates, so [F4] applies.
The complementary classes lift uniquely to relative generators and the top local-to-global map is an isomorphism. [F3, F4, step 3.1, step 5.1] Step 5.1 and step 3.1 give . Exactness in [F3] therefore makes an isomorphism. The analogous map for is an isomorphism, and the natural pair square together with the absolute restriction isomorphism of step 3.1 identifies these two relative groups. The same holds for in degree . Finally the punctured-space retraction gives vanishing in degrees and , so is an isomorphism.
The product of the unique classes in complementary positive even degrees is the nonzero top class. [F3, F4, F5, F6, A1, step 6.1] In the affine chart , ordered ratios identify a neighborhood of with . They identify with the two coordinate planes, with , and with . Excision in [F4], followed by contraction of the unused coordinate, identifies the nonzero relative classes from step 6.1 with the coefficient-one local generators. Their relative product is nonzero by [F5]. The open complements satisfy , so [F6] transports the product to the top relative group and then through step 6.1 to a nonzero absolute product. Since that top group is one-dimensional by step 3.1, this is its unique nonzero class.
Every finite projective space has the asserted truncated polynomial ring. [F6, step 3.1, step 4.1, step 7.1] For , only the unit remains and . For , is nonzero and above dimension two. Inductively suppose the claim holds for . Step 4.1 and [F6] make restrict to the nonzero for . Step 7.1 with then makes the nonzero top class. All higher powers vanish above dimension . With the additive calculation of step 3.1, polynomial evaluation is onto and its kernel is exactly .
Finite-skeleton detection gives the infinite polynomial ring. [F2, F6, A1, step 2.1, step 3.1, step 8.1] Let be the unique nonzero element of . Restriction to every with is an isomorphism in degree two, so it sends to . By [F6], restricts to , which is nonzero when by step 8.1. Hence is the unique nonzero class in degree from step 3.1. Polynomial evaluation is onto degreewise and injective because a polynomial has finitely many homogeneous terms of distinct degrees.
Every boundary, degeneracy, and choice case is explicit. [F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, A1, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 3.1, step 4.1, step 5.1, step 6.1, step 7.1, step 8.1, step 9.1] The cases , the unit power , the top power , and the first vanishing power were separated. There is no top degree for , but every fixed power is detected on a finite skeleton. The spaces are nonempty; zero classes and all odd groups are zero. The local product uses , so no zero-dimensional factor is smuggled into [F5]. The homotopies in step 5.1 specify both endpoints and their nonzero domains. The singular cochain definitions in [F7] retain degenerate simplices. Coefficient reduction is a specified map and introduces no choice. AC is used exactly through UCT [F2] and the local product [F5]; the finite coordinate constructions add none. No biconditional or converse is asserted. ∎
Depends on
- A CW complex with no cells in adjacent dimensions has zero cellular boundary
- Cellular homology computes singular homology
- Oriented cellular chain group
- Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps
- Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology
- Long exact sequence of a pair in singular cohomology
- Naturality of the singular cohomology pair sequence
- Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology
- Excision for singular cohomology
- Local coordinate cup products generate top relative cohomology
- Relative cup products are natural and connector-compatible
- Singular cochain complex with coefficients
- Singular cup product on cochains
- Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial
- Cup product is natural, unital and associative
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)