Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weak curl-free fields on a contractible polyhedron are gradients

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let Ω⊂R3 be a nonempty bounded connected contractible Lipschitz polyhedron. If u∈H(curl⁡;Ω) has distributional curl zero, then there is p∈H1(Ω) with u=∇p almost everywhere; p is unique up to an additive constant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the domain and the real curl-free field in the Statement. AC is used through the existing analytic suppliers and implies their CC assumptions.

[F1]

A contractible space has trivial fundamental group gives the loop-homotopy hypothesis of Local weak scalar potentials and continuation on a simply connected open set, which supplies a primitive f∈Hloc1(Ω).

[F2]

Scalar H1 and H2 extension across a bounded Lipschitz boundary makes this bounded Lipschitz domain an H1 extension domain, so Poincare-Wirtinger on bounded connected extension domains by Rellich compactness applies to globally H1 functions.

[F3]

Chain rule for globally Lipschitz scalar maps of Sobolev functions applies on each relatively compact open subset and hence supplies the local chain rule. Zero weak gradient gives componentwise constants gives uniqueness.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3construct

By [F1] choose f∈Hloc1(Ω) with ∇f=u. It remains to prove global integrability; local weak exactness alone is insufficient. Fix a ball B⋐Ω. For M>0 let fM=max⁡(−M,min⁡(f,M)). By [F3] locally, fM∈Hloc1, ∣∇fM∣≤∣u∣, and ∣fM∣≤M. Since Ω has finite measure, these local derivative identities give global H1(Ω) membership: the function is globally L2, its locally specified derivatives are globally L2, and every compactly supported test uses only finitely many local identities. Thus [F2] gives ∥fM−(fM)Ω∥L2(Ω)≤CΩ∥u∥2.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra∎

Put aM=(fM)Ω and bM=(fM)B. The preceding estimate gives ∣aM−bM∣≤∣B∣−1/2CΩ∥u∥2. Therefore ∥fM−bM∥L2(Ω)≤CΩ(1+∣Ω∣1/2∣B∣−1/2)∥u∥2. On B, f∈L2 and ∣fM∣≤∣f∣, so dominated convergence gives bM→fB. Along the integers M→∞, fM→f almost everywhere; Fatou's lemma applied to the displayed bound yields f−fB∈L2(Ω). Its weak gradient is u∈L2, hence p=f−fB∈H1(Ω). If two such p exist, their difference has zero weak gradient, and [F3] makes it constant on connected Ω. This proves every original analytic and geometric clause.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources