Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A holomorphic extension of a rational map on a product of smooth complex curves is algebraic

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let C1,C2 be smooth complex algebraic curves, and Y a separated complex algebraic variety. Suppose a rational map f:C1×C2⇢Y has an everywhere defined holomorphic extension on the associated complex manifolds. Then that extension is induced by a unique algebraic morphism C1×C2→Y.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A smooth algebraic complex curve has a local holomorphic parameter which can be taken to be an algebraic local coordinate. (Local holomorphic charts on nonsingular complex algebraic curves)

[F2]

A regular local ring with residue field C and cotangent basis t1,…,td has associated graded ring C[T1,…,Td]. Its completion is faithfully flat, and faithful flatness detects zero modules. (associated graded ring of a regular local ring, Jacobson-adic completion is faithfully flat, Descent of vanishing along a faithfully flat morphism)

[F4]

Complex closed points detect nonempty closed subsets of a finite-type complex scheme, and a holomorphic function on a connected several-variable neighbourhood vanishing on an open subset vanishes identically. (Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal, A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically)

[F3]

Holomorphic functions in several variables are smooth; their formal Taylor coefficients respect addition and multiplication by the iterated product rule. (Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic)

Proof

Given: AC, C1,C2,Y,f, and its holomorphic extension h.

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Fix a complex point x of the product, and choose algebraic local parameters t,s of the two curves at its coordinates using [F1]. They are holomorphic manifold coordinates at x and a cotangent basis of the two-dimensional regular local algebraic ring R=OC1×C2,x. By [F2], the map C[ ⁣[T,S] ⁣]→R^ sending T,S to t,s is an isomorphism: its maps on successive homogeneous quotients are the graded isomorphism in [F2], so lifting successively in the complete filtrations proves surjectivity and the first nonzero homogeneous term proves injectivity. Formal Taylor expansion of analytic germs, justified by [F3], agrees with this identification on every element of R. Indeed it sends the parameters to T,S, respects ring operations, and gives the same finite jets on the polynomial representatives of each R/mn supplied by [F2].

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Choose an affine open of Y containing h(x) and finitely many coordinate-ring generators. By holomorphy and continuity their pullbacks under h are holomorphic on a manifold neighbourhood of x. On the nonempty rational domain they are rational functions, so write one as a/b∈Frac⁡R. The identity a=bh∗(z) holds on that domain in the neighbourhood and hence as analytic germs by continuity; the complement of the rational domain has no manifold interior, since a nonzero algebraic defining function gives a nonzero holomorphic germ and cannot vanish on a manifold open. Taking formal Taylor series via step 1.1 gives a∈bR^. Faithful flatness in [F2] forces a∈bR: the nonzero class of a in R/(b) could not become zero after a faithful flat extension. Thus every target coordinate pulls back to an element of R.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1construct∎

The finitely many pulled-back coordinates are regular on an algebraic neighbourhood of x, satisfy the target's algebraic relations by generic agreement, and therefore define an algebraic extension there. They agree analytically with h near x by step 2.1. The same argument applies at every complex point. The complement of the union of these algebraic neighbourhoods is closed and has no complex closed point, hence is empty by the weak Nullstellensatz. Separatedness glues the extensions and makes them unique, since they agree on the dense original rational domain. This constructs the asserted algebraic morphism. AC is inherited from the regularity/completion suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources