How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A first parameter lowers local dimension by exactly one
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a Noetherian local ring of positive dimension , and let be a system of parameters. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian local ring with , and a system of parameters .
Since is a system of parameters, its ideal is -primary. Hence the images of generate an -primary ideal in ; no dimension of the quotient is assumed here (Systems of parameters and parameter ideals, Parameter ideals are exactly the m-primary d-generated ideals).
Under the Axiom of Choice, a prime minimal over an ideal generated by elements has height at most , and conversely a prime of finite height is locally minimal over generators (Krull's height theorem, Converse to Krull's height theorem in localised form).
Prime ideals of correspond to prime ideals of that contain (Prime ideals of a quotient ring are exactly the prime ideals containing the ideal).
Proof
By [L1], the maximal ideal of is minimal over an ideal generated by elements. If , that ideal is zero, so the maximal ideal is a minimal prime and the quotient has dimension zero. If , apply the height theorem to its generators. In either case .
Suppose instead that . The quotient is a nonzero local ring, so this is impossible when . For , [L2] applied in the local ring provides an ideal generated by at most elements whose radical is the maximal ideal . Lifting those generators to and adjoining , we obtain an ideal of generated by at most elements with radical . Applying the height theorem to the maximal ideal of would then give , contradiction.
Therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.60: Dimension (standard reference, not scraped)
- Melvin Hochster, Dimension theory and systems of parameters (standard reference, not scraped)