How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quasi-uniform finite-element mass inverses have summable graph decay
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Fix a degree . The mesh contract has two branches. In dimensions , let be a bounded polyhedral open set and let be finite matching affine simplex meshes as in Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity, with , , , , and for constants and independent of . In dimension , let be a bounded interval or a finite union of bounded intervals with pairwise disjoint closures, and let be finite interval partitions of the component closures meeting only at whole endpoints, with interval lengths between and and .
For each mesh, place the degree- barycentric Lagrange nodes on every simplex, or the equally spaced Lagrange nodes on every interval, identify coincident nodes of matching cells, and impose zero coefficients at every node on . Let be the resulting scalar continuous piecewise- space. If are its interior nodes, the global nodal basis, and
join distinct nodes when they occur in one cell and write for the shortest path length in this graph (with when there is no path, and use ). Whenever , there are and , independent of the mesh, such that For every cell and , if are its local nodal coefficients and on , then At , omit in the function estimate and replace the gradient bound by . Summing gives, for all global nodal coefficients including zero boundary coefficients, with the factor omitted at . The empty interior-node case is interpreted as and has no mass matrix to invert.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; one of the two stated mesh branches; a fixed ; and the scalar continuous degree- nodal space with zero boundary coefficients.
For , a matching affine simplicial mesh consists of finitely many closed nondegenerate simplices with disjoint interiors whose union is and whose pairwise intersections are whole faces (Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity). The interval-partition branch is defined explicitly in this Statement and does not use that definition.
On a fixed reference simplex, polynomial norms, derivative seminorms, facet norms, and every linear nodal functional are controlled by finite-dimensional norm equivalence (Polynomial derivative and face norms are controlled on a reference simplex). The affine maps of a shape-regular simplex scale cell volume like and derivatives like (Shape regularity controls affine simplex geometry).
A real symmetric endomorphism on a finite-dimensional real inner-product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis (Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis).
Axis-parallel boxes with real endpoints have Lebesgue measure equal to the product of their side lengths; measures are additive on finite disjoint families and monotone (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, Measures on sigma-algebras, Measures are monotone).
Countable Choice is used through the Sobolev and finite-dimensional norm interfaces in [F2], and the box-measure result in [F4] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
On a reference simplex with barycentric coordinates , take the nodes for nonnegative integers with . They are unisolvent for . Indeed, use induction on , with the zero-dimensional constant case and the degree-one vertex case as bases. For , restriction to the face vanishes identically by the dimension induction, so the polynomial is with . At nodes with , the affine change and for identifies the remaining nodes with the degree- barycentric lattice. The induction makes vanish at every node of that lattice, hence . The number of barycentric nodes is by placing separators among stars; this equals the number of degree-at-most- monomials in variables, so it is and the unisolvent values define a basis. In , the equally spaced nodes are unisolvent because a nonzero degree- polynomial has at most roots. On a shared face the two cells have the same face nodes; unisolvence of the face restriction makes their polynomial traces agree when the shared nodal values agree. The same face-node unisolvence shows that zero nodal coefficients on a boundary facet give its zero polynomial trace; in the boundary facets are the zero-valued endpoints. Unisolvence also means that local nodal interpolation reproduces every polynomial in , so the local basis sums to one and reproduces affine polynomials. Thus the constructed nodal functions are conforming and have the declared zero boundary values.
If , a path of common-cell links gives . Any cell containing such a node lies in . In , quasi-uniformity and shape regularity give ; each cell therefore contains an axis-parallel open cube of side inside an inscribed ball. These cubes are disjoint and lie in the box . By [F4], each has measure at least and the outer box has measure , so additivity and monotonicity bound the number of such cells by . In , the intervals lie in an interval of length and have lengths at least , giving the same cell bound. Each cell contains a fixed number of nodes, hence The same packing bound shows that the number of cells incident to any fixed node is uniformly bounded, since all such cells lie in .
On each reference cell, [F2] bounds the norm above and below by the norm of the finitely many nodal coefficients; it also bounds the reference gradient norm above by that coefficient norm. Affine scaling then gives, for , For replace the first factor by . The same statements follow on an interval from and the fixed one-dimensional nodal basis. Since , all cell scales are uniform in .
For finite , sum the local equivalence in step 2.1 over all cells. Each cell contains a fixed number of nodes, and each global node is incident to uniformly many cells by the packing bound in step 1.2 (in at most two intervals meet at a node). Thus each global coefficient occurs between one and a uniformly bounded number of times, giving the asserted global lower and upper scaling. Taking maxima of local polynomial norm equivalences gives the scaling.
The interior-node mass matrix is symmetric positive definite because , which is positive for every nonzero coefficient vector by the lower scaling in step 3.1. Taking there shows for positive constants independent of the mesh.
Put and . By step 4.1 and [F3], . The matrix has zero entry unless or occur in a common cell. Consequently for , since a nonzero product of entries would give a graph path of length at most . The norm-convergent Neumann series gives If , every summand is zero and the inverse entry is zero.
Grouping the entry bound of step 5.1 by graph distance and applying the ball count of step 1.2 gives each absolute row sum at most ; the series converges by the ratio test because its term ratio tends to . Symmetry of gives the same column bound. These constants do not depend on the number of cells.
Depends on
- Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity
- Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh
- Polynomial derivative and face norms are controlled on a reference simplex
- Shape regularity controls affine simplex geometry
- Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- Measures on sigma-algebras
- Measures are monotone
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lars Diening, Johannes Storn, and Tabea Tscherpel, On the Sobolev and Lp-Stability of the L2-Projection, arXiv:2008.01801v2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Christian Clason, Introduction to Finite Element Methods, arXiv:1709.08618v2 (standard reference, not scraped)